Re: low em wave shield
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 09/03/04
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: Phil Holman: "Re: need help with basic motion problem"
- In reply to: Paul: "Re: low em wave shield"
- Next in thread: Edward Green: "Re: low em wave shield"
- Reply: Edward Green: "Re: low em wave shield"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 06:32:12 GMT
Paul wrote:
>
> Some say, the cage will radiate whatever em wave that's inside the
> cage and block what's outside? Can someone verify?
> Since our world has lot of em waves and humans also radiate em waves,
> does that mean, a human inside a cage will not receive em waves from
> outside and outside world can receive some em waves from the cage?
> Does the cage blocks all frequencies?
> Does the cage have to be grounded?
>
> Thanks
Faraday Cage
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/FaradayCage.html
A conducting cage used to shield electronic equipment. Amazingly,
the law of electrostatics conspire so that electric fields outside
are completely canceled out in the interior, as well as vice versa.
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation"
- Previous message: Phil Holman: "Re: need help with basic motion problem"
- In reply to: Paul: "Re: low em wave shield"
- Next in thread: Edward Green: "Re: low em wave shield"
- Reply: Edward Green: "Re: low em wave shield"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
