Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon

From: 1aircraftQAguy (glennab1_at_aol.com)
Date: 09/03/04 

Date: 3 Sep 2004 02:16:05 -0700

"C-Fresh" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message news:<Xns955890DD3B316spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> glennab1@aol.com (1aircraftQAguy) wrote in
> news:a83bb3a1.0409020822.2b82e24b@posting.google.com:
>
> > lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) wrote in message
> > news:<633b063b.0409020213.279dc58b@posting.google.com>...
> >> "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in message
> >> news:<ch5t4c$bs3$0@pita.alt.net>...
> >> > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:bDuZc.38817$Es2.17115355@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> >> > >
> >> > > "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in message
> >> > > news:ch3a8u$gu8$0@pita.alt.net...
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> >> > > > news:fL9Zc.33379$Es2.13665564@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > "Bango Skank" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> >> > > > > news:Xns9556C4FC0F435spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
> >> > > > > > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in
> news:h_6Zc.32762
> >> > > > > > $Es2.13130332@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in
> >> > > > > > > message news:ch2p3r$5sa$0@pita.alt.net...
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in
> >> > > > > > >> message
> >> > > > > > >> news:5C5Zc.32102$Es2.12878616@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > I know, I know. I am seriously considering getting
> >> > > > > > >> > absolved.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Still answering your own posts?
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > So you admit not having ever posted the words in the ASCE
> >> > > > > > > report
> that
> >> > > > > > > specifically detail how the columns between the AC and the
> >> > > > > > > AE
> >> > Drive
> >> > Punch
> >> > > > > > > Out were not significantly damaged after all. It would be
> >> > > > > > > to much
> typing.
> >> > > > > > > That makes you a kooky liar.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > He could view it as HTML, and then copy and paste it. The
> >> > > > > > problem
> >> > is,
> >> > no
> >> > > > > > such explanation is given.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Umm, yes you are correct.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > You mean, "I are correct", don't you?
> >> > >
> >> > > Are you not taking medication for your ailments?
> >> > >
> >> > > Post the words from the ASCE report that specifically detail how
> >> > > the
> columns
> >> > > between the AC and the AE Drive Punch Out were not significantly
> >> > > damaged.
> >> >
> >> > Already asked and answered. Stop repeating yourself.
> >>
> >>
> >> OK, to play devil's advocate, this thread is so mired down in
> >> nonsense, it's almost impossible to wade through. If the question has
> >> been asked and answered would it be possible to give a link to the
> >> answer? Also, I believe a 757 hit the Pentagon. I think angles and
> >> security camera distortion could explain why the plane in the now
> >> famous picture (sorry, no link, but that's an easy one to find) looks
> >> too short. But I would like to know what the "non-missile" answer is
> >> to the smoke trail below the fuselage.
> >
> > With two big vacuum cleaners running at high power just above the
> > ground...... there had to have been serious FOD. (That's Engines, and
> > Foreign Object Damage.)
> >
>
> What a wonderfully empty response. Nice use of jargon in an attempt to
> appear authoritative, though. Did you ever find that American Airlines logo
> you claimed to have seen, by the way? Or the 757 you say you saw?

Empty Response? Attempt to Appear Authoritative? LOL That would be you, BOY!
Why do you keep changing the doper site around?
How many user ID's do you have? 4 or 5?