Re: Google.

From: mitch perkins (mitchsperkins_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/06/04 

Date: 6 Sep 2004 07:49:31 -0700

Jeff Relf <Usenet@JeffRelf.Cotse.NET> wrote in message news:<_Jeff_Relf_2004_Sep_5_CcEJ@Cotse.NET>...
> Hi Mitch Perkins,
>
> You wrote: <<
>
> Your method of " ranking of people ",
> complete with error(s)... >>
>
> Note that I labeled it _ a _ ranking, not _ the _ ranking.

  Your arrogance is obscene.
>
> It's just a method, take it or leave it.

  Consider it left.
>
> I like it because it ranks people by direct replies.

  You like it because you are a *silly fucker*.
>
> As for errors... What errors ?

  At the time of your stupid post, my thread had only one reply and
was therefore not to be included, according to your own meaningless
"rules".
>
> I divided the whole thing into two groups,
> which I should've labeled more clearly as:

  <slap>

  Shut up, Relf!
 
> And that's your unspoken complaint isn't it Mitch ?

  My complaint wrt you was typed clearly: "idiot".
 
> Your stuck using a broken newsreader: Google.

  The word is "you're".
  Google is fine.
  If I got the kind of responses here that you get, I would stop
posting.
  Your arrogance is obscene.

  Mitch

Quantcast