Re: The electron shell model is in challenge
From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 09/07/04
- Next message: Karl Johanson: "Re: Al-Qaeda nukes real threat to USA"
- Previous message: tj Frazir: "Re: Television signals 2400 inches"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: The electron shell model is in challenge"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: The electron shell model is in challenge"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: The electron shell model is in challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 6 Sep 2004 22:15:41 -0700
Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<chi2pd$24g$5@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
> Y
>
> >
> >
> > -------------
> > Hi Fertz inventor
> > anyone can judge what is your real worth as a scincist
>
> Yes. Hint: you are *still* the only one here who thinks that the idea
> is ridiculous. You are *still* the only one here who says that the
> idea is not worth of a scientist.
----------
ok get the Nobel for it
2 why dont you ask even some real seniour scintists in your
University about it ?
sorry
i forgot i will never get a frank admittance from you
--------------
>
>
>
> >>>>>2 i am not interested t go on with that discussion publicly
> >>>>>if you like and if you will behve decently
> >>>>>we can go on it privately
> >>>>
> >>>>Why? You don't like other people seeing how heavily you got beaten, right?
> >>>>-------------------------
> >>>
> >>>Hi Fertz inventor (Fertzman)
> >>
> >>That you continue harping on this shows only time and time again that
> >>you don't understand science.
> >
> > -------------
> > incurable imbecil
> > some seniour scintists told you mildly in that thread
> > that you are a shamless ibbecil
>
> No one said anything like that.
>
> People pointed out that such a wave would be quickly damped. That
> does in no way mean that it can not *exist*. A damped wave is *still*
> a wave.
------------------
not only the damping is an issue
a mathematical idiot like you cant understand that
*the creation of such a wave is an absurd(in reality world !!)
(it is not aseries of waves it is just one(steady) cycle got it idiot??
--------------
> > ------------------
> > anyone who folowed those last articles
> > including my suggestion to discuss soeme issues privately
> > and your animal response to it
>
> What was "animal" about the response
> "Why? You don't like other people seeing how heavily you got beaten, right?"
> ----------------
i explained to you idiot that there are some issues
that should not fall into hostile hands in some geographyic places in this
world got it idiot??
you are not interested in scince
you are interested in personal victories!!(and revange
and political iprovement of your personal status- thats all that is in your mind!!)
a good sighn of a disturbed man and a zero persionality and scintist
that is unable for pioneering scince
(now will come you 'Huoo' as an answer)
---------------
got it idiot?
--------------
>
>
> > realise that you are a little piece of human shitt
> > and not worth to deal with moreover a harmful personality.
> > (probably menthaly disturbed as well)
>
> Well, then why do you keep replying to me, with posts filled with
> insults? Man, you *really* must hate me!
i amnot sure if to hate you or pitty you(as a psychotic case)
sometimes you are useful in suplying information
and raising arguments for thinking
sometimes you becom by a miraculous switch to an animal
may be a split personality.may be some bad advisors -i cant know.
because youi dont get of my back
and i will not let you to make the impression of being right
and having the last word whiloe you are just a little nasty pompous zero
i will not let agression win not any kind of scintific terorism
the way you are sitting on my back nonstop is a sort of terrorism
(i didnt invite you to take place in that thread
if i am nothing for you than just ignore me at the first place!!
thats the usual normal human behaviour!!!
othererwise is *disturbed behaviour*
-----------------
Y.Porat
----------------------
- Next message: Karl Johanson: "Re: Al-Qaeda nukes real threat to USA"
- Previous message: tj Frazir: "Re: Television signals 2400 inches"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: The electron shell model is in challenge"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: The electron shell model is in challenge"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: The electron shell model is in challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]