Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon

From: lensman1955 (lensman1955_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/07/04


Date: 7 Sep 2004 02:59:15 -0700


"C-Fresh" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message news:<Xns955C853C34E69spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> Phil Miller <philmil@REMOVEoptusnet.com.au> wrote in
> news:lfgoj0ttd9to7vgsl2bvhiea36j5p9f9ck@4ax.com:
>
> > On 6 Sep 2004 03:18:41 -0700, lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955)
> > wrote:
> >
> >>"Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> >>news:<fcL_c.24440$lv3.7932542@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
>
> >>> I ask again, where is the text that explains this? Post this magic
> >>> text, its location, section and paragraph etc. Please, lets put this
> >>> behind us. Do it for your country, kook.
> >>
> >>He just did. According to the report, the columns were cracked and
> >>spalled (whatever the Hell "spalling" is.) How does that equate with
> >>"don't even show any cosmetic damage"?)
> >
> > http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=spalling
> >
> > spall (spôl)
> > n.
> > A chip, fragment, or flake from a piece of stone or ore.
> >
> > v. spalled, spall·ing, spalls
> > v. tr.
> > To break up into chips or fragments.
> >
> > v. intr.
> > To chip or crumble.
> >
> >
> >
> > Phil
> > --
> > Pfft...English! Who needs that? I'm never going to England.
> > Homer J. Simpson
>
> The column in front of the punch-out shows NO DAMAGE:

I see. So now we're going from "8 colums" and "some columns show no
damage" to "_The_ column in front of the punch-out shows NO DAMAGE:"
That's a major change.



Relevant Pages


Quantcast