Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon

From: Homeland_Insecurity (insecurity_at_homeland.net)
Date: 09/07/04 

Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 11:00:27 GMT

"lensman1955" <lensman1955@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:633b063b.0409070159.17562c3b@posting.google.com...
> "C-Fresh" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
news:<Xns955C853C34E69spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> > Phil Miller <philmil@REMOVEoptusnet.com.au> wrote in
> > news:lfgoj0ttd9to7vgsl2bvhiea36j5p9f9ck@4ax.com:
> >
> > > On 6 Sep 2004 03:18:41 -0700, lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >>"Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> > >>news:<fcL_c.24440$lv3.7932542@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> >
> > >>> I ask again, where is the text that explains this? Post this magic
> > >>> text, its location, section and paragraph etc. Please, lets put this
> > >>> behind us. Do it for your country, kook.
> > >>
> > >>He just did. According to the report, the columns were cracked and
> > >>spalled (whatever the Hell "spalling" is.) How does that equate with
> > >>"don't even show any cosmetic damage"?)
> > >
> > > http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=spalling
> > >
> > > spall (spôl)
> > > n.
> > > A chip, fragment, or flake from a piece of stone or ore.
> > >
> > > v. spalled, spall·ing, spalls
> > > v. tr.
> > > To break up into chips or fragments.
> > >
> > > v. intr.
> > > To chip or crumble.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Phil
> > > --
> > > Pfft...English! Who needs that? I'm never going to England.
> > > Homer J. Simpson
> >
> > The column in front of the punch-out shows NO DAMAGE:
>
> I see. So now we're going from "8 colums" and "some columns show no
> damage" to "_The_ column in front of the punch-out shows NO DAMAGE:"
> That's a major change.

No, not quite. There are some eight columns in between the AC and (pretty
much directly in front of ) the punchout with no significant impairment. I
simply want the fucks to show the ASCE text that details how this happened,
as they have repeatedly claimed although they can't show the text. I say the
ASCE report doesn't detail how these columns were left with no significant
impairment and yet ther was enough force for the punchout which was also
reinforced with rebar.

http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/pages-en/dam-inside.html
"As a matter of fact, as mentionned in the ASCE report, the debris traveling
on the second half of the path from entry point to "punch out" hole must be
considered as a "flow" of aircraft debris, fuel, and other material (bricks,
furniture, ...) collected all along the path. It seems impossible that such
a flow of debris, sliding mainly at ground level on the slab of the first
floor, could have made the nearly perfectly oval shaped "punch out" hole in
the wall of ring C, the center of this hole being approximately at 5 feet
(1.5 m) above ground level. There is also no reason for this flow to
concentrate on the centerline of the trajectory, on the contrary it should
have scattered and bounced all over the building's interior like a shotgun
blast due to shocks against columns. The "punch out" hole has been made by a
heavy object which impacted on it's center. Some fractions of a second
later, a part of the flow of objects arrived to this hole position and
exited through it to be found in AE drive, like for example a wheel rim."