Re: Speculative, but at least interesting
From: Alfred Einstead (whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu)
Date: 09/08/04
- Next message: jem: "Re: arXiv endorsement request"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Magic clusters double up"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Speculative, but at least interesting"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Speculative, but at least interesting"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Speculative, but at least interesting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Sep 2004 05:42:05 -0700
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:
> Assume the Riemann hypothesis is true, then crack every code. A valid
> proof would alter nothing here. NSA can brute force crack any
> Officially sanctioned encryption right now.
Steganography, however, is like Quantum Physics. You can't crack it
until you see it.
- Next message: jem: "Re: arXiv endorsement request"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Magic clusters double up"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Speculative, but at least interesting"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Speculative, but at least interesting"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Speculative, but at least interesting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
