Physics discussion irrelevant to sci.physics
From: Anarch Peak (master_at_mason.snuh)
Date: 09/09/04
- Next message: Anarch Peak: "Re: Oops! The building just collapsed!"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Physics without energy"
- Next in thread: running with scissors: "Re: Physics discussion irrelevant to sci.physics"
- Reply: running with scissors: "Re: Physics discussion irrelevant to sci.physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Sep 2004 17:30:18 GMT
Eric Gisse <fsegg@!SPAMuaf.edu> wrote in
news:h1f0k05fcplo1a090oliavivf3fi5edq54@4ax.com:
> On 9 Sep 2004 01:12:10 -0700, aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com
> (running with scissors) wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> YET ANOTHER INSANE STUPID THREAD INTO THE KILLFILE.
>
> Christ, this takes up WAY too much of sci.physics.....
>
> How many threads am I going to have to put into the killfile for being
> irrelevant to sci.physics?
It's too bad you physics people can't contribute, eh?
Cowards.
-- http://BeDoper.com - BeOS and a hell of a lot more Virgin Message Board http://bedoper.com/cgi-bin/plugins/BBS/bedoper_ubb/Ultimate.cgi? action=intro Gortician's Not Dead, Punk http://www.metal-archives.com/release.php?id=15537
- Next message: Anarch Peak: "Re: Oops! The building just collapsed!"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Physics without energy"
- Next in thread: running with scissors: "Re: Physics discussion irrelevant to sci.physics"
- Reply: running with scissors: "Re: Physics discussion irrelevant to sci.physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]