Re: Eotvos: Une questionne pour le Oncle du Al
From: Ken S. Tucker (dynamics_at_vianet.on.ca)
Date: 09/09/04
- Next message: Mike: "Re: GPS versus source dependency / ballistic theory"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Russia Getting Set To Pull An Uncle Al? (was: Al-Qaeda nukes real threat to USA...)"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Eotvos: Une questionne pour le Oncle du Al"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Eotvos: Une questionne pour le Oncle du Al"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Eotvos: Une questionne pour le Oncle du Al"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Sep 2004 12:19:23 -0700
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<41407035.2D2EC5C3@hate.spam.net>...
Pardon interruption...
> The real world math works as pure math theory predicts. By
> mid-October there will be at least 25,000 points in the least squares
> fit, with a chance at up to 50,000. It will require a very creative
> gainsayer to find any criticism at all - to six decimal places. Then
> the empirical results begin to arrive.
>
> We will know, we will have theoretical basis for the answer either
> way, and we will have explicit calculation to enable a galaxy of
> funded further testing if there is net output. The vote was cast 14.7
> billion years ago. The ballot box will be opened within nine months.
If a positive result is returned in your favor,
would the covariant derivative (or absolute) of
the metric tensor still vanish? Would
g_uv;w = 0 ?
TIA
Ken S. Tucker
- Next message: Mike: "Re: GPS versus source dependency / ballistic theory"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Russia Getting Set To Pull An Uncle Al? (was: Al-Qaeda nukes real threat to USA...)"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Eotvos: Une questionne pour le Oncle du Al"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Eotvos: Une questionne pour le Oncle du Al"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Eotvos: Une questionne pour le Oncle du Al"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
