Re: Physics discussion irrelevant to sci.physics
From: running with scissors (aabbcc_running_with_scissors_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/10/04
- Next message: Richard Henry: "Re: These are the folks from the...."
- Previous message: running with scissors: "Re: Pulp Fiction: The Pentagon"
- In reply to: Anarch Peak: "Physics discussion irrelevant to sci.physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Sep 2004 23:57:04 -0700
Anarch Peak <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message news:<Xns955F7F0CC6CADspamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> Eric Gisse <fsegg@!SPAMuaf.edu> wrote in
> news:h1f0k05fcplo1a090oliavivf3fi5edq54@4ax.com:
>
> > On 9 Sep 2004 01:12:10 -0700, aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com
> > (running with scissors) wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > YET ANOTHER INSANE STUPID THREAD INTO THE KILLFILE.
> >
> > Christ, this takes up WAY too much of sci.physics.....
> >
> > How many threads am I going to have to put into the killfile for being
> > irrelevant to sci.physics?
>
> It's too bad you physics people can't contribute, eh?
>
> Cowards.
>
the physics people are most likley too amazed at your attempts fit a
4" square peg into a 1" round hole
- Next message: Richard Henry: "Re: These are the folks from the...."
- Previous message: running with scissors: "Re: Pulp Fiction: The Pentagon"
- In reply to: Anarch Peak: "Physics discussion irrelevant to sci.physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
