Re: Never have so many been so wrong about so much!

From: ZZBunker (zzbunker_at_netscape.net)
Date: 09/10/04 

Date: 10 Sep 2004 02:42:43 -0700

Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:<T960d.18203$qA1.8341@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com>...
> You see these wrong ideas all over the place especially in the media and
> the pop books.
> Never have so many been so wrong about so much! On the other hand,
> better wrong, than "not even wrong" (W. Pauli).
>
> Here is what is taught at Cal Tech from John Pea***'s book
> "Cosmological Physics" where I start this whole thing from. BTW
> Pea***'s theorem neglects vacuum coherence entirely and leads to the
> cosmological constant problem. But Pea*** ties together totally random
> micro-quantum zero point virtual quanta and Einstein's gravity theory in
> the correct way. Hal Puthoff & Co do not do so, but ignore the
> constraints of Einstein's gravity theory completely. Also Mike Turner
> does not have the idea of vacuum coherence either. All The Pundits who
> think dark energy and dark matter are fundamentally different are
> barking up the wrong tree. Both have w = -1 but large dark matter globs
> look like w = 0 CDM in their gravity lensing!

  But having w=anything, has the singular property
  that it proves nothing about dark matter or dark energy.

  Since the existence of dark *matter* is only
  posulated for Astronomers to hold a temporary
  job before being replaced by advanced non-lensing,
  non-QM Astronomy, and to hold a theory of *Galaxies*,
  not Black Holes together.

  And "dark" energy is merely a postulate to hold QM's
  virtual "photons" together.

  So neither has even the slightest relation of
  Einstein, gravity, E=MC^2, and the new-fangled physical
  concept of velocity-energy. Since both
  only concern the truly infinitely irrelevent
  Newtonian "momentum" of COSMO-TIME.