Re: arXiv endorsement request
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 09/10/04
- Next message: Old Man: "Re: Curvature is time distortion"
- Previous message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Exposed - ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ aka 'Uncle Al' <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>"
- In reply to: Eugene Shubert: "Re: arXiv endorsement request"
- Next in thread: YBM: "Re: arXiv endorsement request"
- Reply: YBM: "Re: arXiv endorsement request"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:02:10 -0000
Eugene Shubert:
>"J.J. Simplicio" <abc@nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:%SP%c.2771$MQ5.811@attbi_s52...>
>> "Eugene Shubert" <http://www.everythingimportant.org> wrote in
>> message
>> news:413f829c@sys13.hou.wt.net...
>>
>>> I searched and found. "As explained, T=-x'/u and T'=x/u are
>>> perfectly good definitions of clock times for L and L'
>>> respectfully."
>>
>> Just to check something. If you did adopt this definition,
>
>What do you mean by "if"? Don't you think it's time for relativists
>to understand SR in arbitrary coordinate systems?
Why is that a big deal? The metric is still flat or else it isn't
special relativity.
- Next message: Old Man: "Re: Curvature is time distortion"
- Previous message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Exposed - ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ aka 'Uncle Al' <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>"
- In reply to: Eugene Shubert: "Re: arXiv endorsement request"
- Next in thread: YBM: "Re: arXiv endorsement request"
- Reply: YBM: "Re: arXiv endorsement request"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
