Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon
From: 1aircraftQAguy (glennab1_at_aol.com)
Date: 09/12/04
- Next message: 1aircraftQAguy: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Previous message: DrPostman: "Re: 49 Days & Counting ........."
- In reply to: MC Bob: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Next in thread: MC Bob: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Reply: MC Bob: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Sep 2004 15:40:45 -0700
MC Bob <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message news:<Xns95627F17DD37Aspamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> glennab1@aol.com (1aircraftQAguy) wrote in
> news:a83bb3a1.0409120844.6aac4c31@posting.google.com:
>
> > MC Bob <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> > news:<Xns9562136719413spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> >> lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) wrote in
> >> news:633b063b.0409111934.65ad1409@posting.google.com:
> >>
> >> > aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com (running with scissors)
> >> > wrote in message
> >> > news:<d0fe9d08.0409111152.59d4e820@posting.google.com>...
> >> >> lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) wrote in message
> >> >> news:<633b063b.0409110636.742d1ff1@posting.google.com>...
> >> >> > aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com (running with scissors)
> >> >> > wrote in message
> >> >> > news:<d0fe9d08.0409091403.3d4b7b5b@posting.google.com>...
> >> >> > > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> >> >> > > news:<YjZ%c.9085$bE1.4639698@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> >> >> > > > "running with scissors"
> >> >> > > > <aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> > > > news:d0fe9d08.0409082310.611bde34@posting.google.com...
> >> >> > > > > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in
> >> >> > > > > message
> news:<pQO%c.7231$bE1.3017365@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> >> >> > > > > > "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in
> >> >> > > > > > message news:chntoq$9nt$0@pita.alt.net...
> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > "Anarch Peak" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> >> >> > > > > > > news:Xns955EA7028F829spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
> >> >> > > > > > > > egusenet@verizon.net (Eric) wrote in
> >> >> > > > > > > > news:1gjst3k.151aazr1mcy8f1N% egusenet@verizon.net:
> >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > > Anarch Peak <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> egusenet@verizon.net (Eric) wrote in
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> news:1gjsmne.eqsm0m1fnx4heN% egusenet@verizon.net:
> >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> > C-Fresh <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> >> Were is your investigative data?
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> >
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > I've already directed you to where you can do
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > some genuine investigation.
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >>
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> Have you done any yourself?
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> > Since any investigation I have done makes no
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> > difference to you,
> your
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> > question is quite pointless.
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> >> > > > > > > > >> That's a good cop-out.
> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > > Only if it wasn't true.
> >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > Well, since I am one of the leading researchers in
> >> >> > > > > > > > these groups, it
> is
> >> >> > > > > > > > obviously, patently not true.
> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > You're a known crackhead and "Usenet Jester." During
> >> >> > > > > > > which psychotic episode did you decide that you were a
> >> >> > > > > > > "leading researcher", Jason?
> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > From the idiot who stated passengers were still strapped
> >> >> > > > > > in their seats
> yet
> >> >> > > > > > aren't mapped out in the biblical ASCE report?
> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > hmm well, seeing as you continually point to the ASCE
> >> >> > > > > report, you either havnt read it, or you missed page 21
> >> >> > > > > which even provides a graphical layout of the passenger
> >> >> > > > > remains locations over both floors.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Strapped in their seats? Really, take your meds, kook.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > <snicker> ...just exposing your kooky foolishness.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > hmmm now where in that sentance did i use the words "Strapped in
> >> >> > > their seats". in fact belive it or not i used the words
> >> >> > > "passenger remains"
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > lets take a look at it shall we.. lets do it together... line by
> >> >> > > line
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > > hmm well, seeing as you continually point to the ASCE
> >> >> > > > > report, you
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > nope "strapped in their seats" not there !!
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > > either havnt read it, or you missed page 21 which even
> >> >> > > > > provides a
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > nope "strapped in their seats" not their either!
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > > graphical layout of the passenger remains locations over
> >> >> > > > > both floors.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > hmm not looking good is it ! damn ! dont you know it..
> >> >> > > "strapped in their seats" not their either !
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > pathetic ! you even make Nixon look like a veritable
> >> >> > > intellectual.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Well, some of them MIGHT have still been in their seats! But it's
> >> >> > true you didn't claim it. Not that that's going to stop him from
> >> >> > claiming you did for the next few weeks!
> >> >>
> >> >> see directly previous post regarding body remains. but no, he will
> >> >> claim white is black and black is white if it suits his argument
> >> >
> >> > ...and get killed at the next zebra crossing! - Thank you Douglas
> >> > Adams.
> >> >
> >>
> >> There were no seats. Or do we just have to take the government's word
> >> for everything?
> >>
> >> The ASCE report certainly contains no locations of bodies strapped in
> >> seats, as has been claimed. They were not even on the scene that day.
> >
> > The ASCE report shows where aircraft occupant bodies were found. It
> > doesn't note if they were in their seat or not.
>
> Then why did one of you 757 theorists make the claim?
757 theorists? LOL
Sorry, you nuts (little ones at that) are a tiny minority.
You're the theorists.
> > It was a building
> > performance report. The fact that the report contains some info about
> > the aircraft, occupants, and other irrelevant data to the building
> > performance doesn't mean it should have contained everything
> > imaginable to satisfy kooky conspiracy theorists.
> > It was a building performance report.
>
> Two months ago, it was waved about as proof a 757 hit the Pentagon.
>
> ; )
It still is, it just doesn't contain everything imaginable to satisfy
kooky conspiracy theorists.
- Next message: 1aircraftQAguy: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Previous message: DrPostman: "Re: 49 Days & Counting ........."
- In reply to: MC Bob: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Next in thread: MC Bob: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Reply: MC Bob: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
