Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon

From: 1aircraftQAguy (glennab1_at_aol.com)
Date: 09/12/04 

Date: 12 Sep 2004 15:44:05 -0700

"Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message news:<iI01d.31304$bE1.16119500@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> "1aircraftQAguy" <glennab1@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:a83bb3a1.0409120844.6aac4c31@posting.google.com...
> > MC Bob <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> news:<Xns9562136719413spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17>...
> > > lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) wrote in
> > > news:633b063b.0409111934.65ad1409@posting.google.com:
> > >
> > > > aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com (running with scissors) wrote
> > > > in message news:<d0fe9d08.0409111152.59d4e820@posting.google.com>...
> > > >> lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) wrote in message
> > > >> news:<633b063b.0409110636.742d1ff1@posting.google.com>...
> > > >> > aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com (running with scissors)
> > > >> > wrote in message
> > > >> > news:<d0fe9d08.0409091403.3d4b7b5b@posting.google.com>...
> > > >> > > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in message
> > > >> > > news:<YjZ%c.9085$bE1.4639698@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> > > >> > > > "running with scissors"
> > > >> > > > <aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > >> > > > news:d0fe9d08.0409082310.611bde34@posting.google.com...
> > > >> > > > > "Homeland_Insecurity" <insecurity@homeland.net> wrote in
> > > >> > > > > message
> news:<pQO%c.7231$bE1.3017365@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> > > >> > > > > > "AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in
> message
> > > >> > > > > > news:chntoq$9nt$0@pita.alt.net...
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > "Anarch Peak" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> > > >> > > > > > > news:Xns955EA7028F829spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
> > > >> > > > > > > > egusenet@verizon.net (Eric) wrote in
> > > >> > > > > > > > news:1gjst3k.151aazr1mcy8f1N% egusenet@verizon.net:
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Anarch Peak <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> egusenet@verizon.net (Eric) wrote in
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> news:1gjsmne.eqsm0m1fnx4heN% egusenet@verizon.net:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > C-Fresh <master@mason.snuh> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> >> Were is your investigative data?
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > I've already directed you to where you can do
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > some genuine investigation.
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> Have you done any yourself?
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Since any investigation I have done makes no
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > difference to you,
> your
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > question is quite pointless.
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > >> That's a good cop-out.
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Only if it wasn't true.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Well, since I am one of the leading researchers in
> these
> > > >> > > > > > > > groups, it
> is
> > > >> > > > > > > > obviously, patently not true.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > You're a known crackhead and "Usenet Jester." During
> which
> > > >> > > > > > > psychotic episode did you decide that you were a "leading
> > > >> > > > > > > researcher", Jason?
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > From the idiot who stated passengers were still strapped in
> > > >> > > > > > their seats
> yet
> > > >> > > > > > aren't mapped out in the biblical ASCE report?
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > hmm well, seeing as you continually point to the ASCE report,
> > > >> > > > > you either havnt read it, or you missed page 21 which even
> > > >> > > > > provides a graphical layout of the passenger remains
> locations
> > > >> > > > > over both floors.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Strapped in their seats? Really, take your meds, kook.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > <snicker> ...just exposing your kooky foolishness.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > hmmm now where in that sentance did i use the words "Strapped in
> > > >> > > their seats". in fact belive it or not i used the words
> "passenger
> > > >> > > remains"
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > lets take a look at it shall we.. lets do it together... line by
> > > >> > > line
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > hmm well, seeing as you continually point to the ASCE report,
> > > >> > > > > you
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > nope "strapped in their seats" not there !!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > either havnt read it, or you missed page 21 which even
> provides
> > > >> > > > > a
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > nope "strapped in their seats" not their either!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > graphical layout of the passenger remains locations over both
> > > >> > > > > floors.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > hmm not looking good is it ! damn ! dont you know it.. "strapped
> > > >> > > in their seats" not their either !
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > pathetic ! you even make Nixon look like a veritable
> intellectual.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Well, some of them MIGHT have still been in their seats! But it's
> > > >> > true you didn't claim it. Not that that's going to stop him from
> > > >> > claiming you did for the next few weeks!
> > > >>
> > > >> see directly previous post regarding body remains. but no, he will
> > > >> claim white is black and black is white if it suits his argument
> > > >
> > > > ...and get killed at the next zebra crossing! - Thank you Douglas
> Adams.
> > > >
> > >
> > > There were no seats. Or do we just have to take the government's word
> for
> > > everything?
> > >
> > > The ASCE report certainly contains no locations of bodies strapped in
> seats,
> > > as has been claimed. They were not even on the scene that day.
> >
> > The ASCE report shows where aircraft occupant bodies were found. It
> > doesn't note if they were in their seat or not. It was a building
> > performance report. The fact that the report contains some info about
> > the aircraft, occupants, and other irrelevant data to the building
> > performance doesn't mean it should have contained everything
> > imaginable to satisfy kooky conspiracy theorists.
> > It was a building performance report.
>
> Tell that to your fellow traveler.

It's irrelevant to the fact that a 757 hit the Pentagon.

Quantcast