Re: Cold Fusion Bombs?
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 09/12/04
- Next message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Oops! The building just collapsed!"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Article: A Century of Einstein"
- In reply to: Jack Sarfatti: "Cold Fusion Bombs?"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Cold Fusion Bombs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:05:59 -0700
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
[snip]
> Jack: Yes, that is precisely my point. The key words are "THE CHANGE in
> the zero point energy due to the presence of the two atoms. There are NO
> ATOMS in my EXACT CALCULATION using ONLY THE FREE EM FIELD with boundary
> conditions. It is not however any effect of FREE EM FIELDS WITHOUT THAT
> INTERACTION! That's the point you keep missing!
[snip]
Idiot.
H.B.G. Casimir, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. B51 793 (1948)
Contemporary Physics 33(5) 313 (1992)
Sov. Phys.-Dokl. 12(11) 1040 (1968)
Proc. Royal Soc. A 312 435 (1969)
Ann. Phys. (NY) 56 474 (1970)
Phys. Rev. E 48(2) 1562 (1993)
Edward G. Harris, "A Pedestrian Approach to Quantum Field Theory,"
Wiley-Interscience, NY 1972, pp. 108-9
Measured to within 5% of theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 5 (1996)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4549 (1998)
Measured to within 1% of theory, Phys. Rev. A 59(5) R3149 (1999)
Imperfect mirrors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3815 (1998)
Temperature above 0 K, Phys. Rev. A 57 1870 (1998)
Curved mirrors, Amer. J. Physics 65 381 (1997))
Spherical dielectrics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 535 (1999)
Idiot.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Oops! The building just collapsed!"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Article: A Century of Einstein"
- In reply to: Jack Sarfatti: "Cold Fusion Bombs?"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Cold Fusion Bombs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
