Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 09/12/04
- Next message: Brian Quincy Hutchings: "Re: Natural Numbers are the adics Re: disproof of FLT and the alleged Wiles"
- Previous message: AbsolutelyCertain: "Re: Oops! The building just collapsed!"
- In reply to: Eugene Shubert: "Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Next in thread: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Tom Roberts: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:30:14 -0000
Eugene Shubert:
The point of relativity is that there is no such thing as
absolute objectivity in a measurement. Measurements are
coordinate dependent.
- Next message: Brian Quincy Hutchings: "Re: Natural Numbers are the adics Re: disproof of FLT and the alleged Wiles"
- Previous message: AbsolutelyCertain: "Re: Oops! The building just collapsed!"
- In reply to: Eugene Shubert: "Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Next in thread: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Tom Roberts: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|