Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?
From: Eugene Shubert (http://www.everythingimportant.org)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: MC Bob: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Previous message: AbsolutelyCertain: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: YBM: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:31:18 -0500
"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
news:slrnck9p0f.89.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
> Eugene Shubert:
>
> The point of relativity is that there is no such thing as
> absolute objectivity in a measurement. Measurements
> are coordinate dependent.
In relativity, there are plenty of statements and gedanken
measurements that are coordinate independent. Such things
are objectively real.
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
Lorentz contraction is coordinate dependent. It is subjective,
misleading and not objectively real.
Away with such nonsense!
Eugene Shubert
http://www.everythingimportant.org
- Next message: MC Bob: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- Previous message: AbsolutelyCertain: "Re: Final Evidence: No 757 Hit The Pentagon"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: YBM: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Is Lorentz contraction objectively real?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
