Re: God=G_uv Proof of 'Intelligent Design'

From: TMG (TMG_at_Nowhere.org)
Date: 09/13/04 

Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:42:36 -0400

George Hammond wrote:

> "TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
> news:IYidneoN_7SGBN7cRVn-jg@comcast.com...
>
>>>Russell E. Rierson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>bv_schornak wrote:
>>
>>>>Now it appears that the "past" moments are cumulative and are
>>>>increasing in information density = Shannon entropy as a cumulative
>>>>overlapping Lorentz invariant circular cross sections on the two
>>>>dimensional separation plane.
>>>>
>>>>The future does not yet exist.
>>>>
>>>>the past is encoded on the present.
>>>>
>>>>Information density is increasing in the universe via the
>>>>overlap/intersection of "event boundaries"
>>>>
>>
>>As I recall, there is an inverse relationship between the density of
>>information and its value.
>
>
> [Hammond]
> OK... if I may make a comment on the "big picture" briefly.
> What you are discussing here comes under the heading
> of the "Quantum Explanation of God".

If it's over your head, we can type slower.

> How do I know that? The proof is simple.
> I have discovered the "classical, or 'semiclassical'
> explanation of God" (Hammond 2003). This actual
> existing proof shows that "classical God" is explained
> by "classical Gravity" (Einsteinian Gravity).
> This de facto means, that when they finally discovery
> the theory of "Quantum Gravity" that we are going
> to get a Quantum Gravity explanation of God.

You don't know what "de facto" means.

> In
> fact my classical proof indicates that Penrose's
> "quantum brain gravity" is the source for the

Totally made up. Google "quantum brain gravity" and you'll see you are
the only entity with a keyboard to ever burp that out into the ether.

> "classical gravitational curvature" that explains the
> "classical God" (note: classical God=invisible man God).

I say the curve proves the classical Jackalope.

> However, since the discovery of quantum gravity is at
> least 50 years away (if not 100), discussions of the
> quantum theory of God are strictly CONJECTURAL,
> and endlessly speculative...

Again, we'll type slower.

> and to IGNORE the
> fact that the classical proof has been DISCOVERED
> is to me simply diversionary.

We're not ignoring it, we're mocking it. HUGE difference.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: God=G_uv Proof of Intelligent Design
    ... > to get a Quantum Gravity explanation of God. ... Google "quantum brain gravity" and you'll see you are ... > quantum theory of God are strictly CONJECTURAL, ... > fact that the classical proof has been DISCOVERED ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
    ... > existence of a Creator God. ... > truly exists, we will see evidence of God in quantum physics, which is ... > where h is Planck's constant, m.e is the mass of the electron, w.C is ... is the mass associated with the Aether. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation
    ... > SPoG is a "classical proof of God", not a "quantum proof of God". ... > and an AMATEUR in theology in the first place. ... >> detail in my book The Physics of Immortality, but a main reason for my ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation
    ... SPoG shows that the "classical invisible person God" of the ... Tipler's theory is a "quantum speculation" about God.... ... and an AMATEUR in theology in the first place. ... Deutsch was awarded the Dirac Medal ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God --> Retroactive Teleogical Causation
    ... SPoG shows that the "classical invisible person God" of the ... Tipler's theory is a "quantum speculation" about God.... ... and an AMATEUR in theology in the first place. ... Deutsch was awarded the Dirac Medal ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast