entanglement question
From: Paul Kelly (P.F.Kelly_at_lboro.ac.uk)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: Richard Herring: "Re: GPS ques"
- Previous message: zigoteau: "Re: Hal Puthoff's Greatest Blunder on Zero Point Energy"
- Next in thread: Dave Langers: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: Dave Langers: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: Mike Hanson: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: John Denker: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: DAH: "re:entanglement question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:19:24 +0100
from a humble chemist; as I understand it, if you have two entangled
particles (a) and (b) and measure a property of particle (a) this
instantaneously, and "spookily", determines the property of particle (b), no
matter how far away it is. Measurement of (b)'s property would confirm
this.
But what if the two measurements - of particle (a) and particle(b) - were
done instantaneously? (a) and (b) would both try to exert a spooky action at
once...
- Next message: Richard Herring: "Re: GPS ques"
- Previous message: zigoteau: "Re: Hal Puthoff's Greatest Blunder on Zero Point Energy"
- Next in thread: Dave Langers: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: Dave Langers: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: Mike Hanson: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: John Denker: "Re: entanglement question"
- Reply: DAH: "re:entanglement question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|