Re: wave and light
From: Harry Conover (hhc314_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/20/04
- Next message: Old Man: "Re: Relativity is a nonmathematical nontheory"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Is a Crystal-clear Theory Preferable to Dogmatic Riddles?"
- In reply to: Andr? Michaud: "Re: wave and light"
- Next in thread: Andr? Michaud: "Re: wave and light"
- Reply: Andr? Michaud: "Re: wave and light"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Sep 2004 17:52:47 -0700
srp@microtec.net (Andr? Michaud) wrote in message news:<562f286c.0409191050.617349e6@posting.google.com>...
> zigoteau@yahoo.com (zigoteau) wrote in message news:<a836cacf.0409190500.6a7f8d83@posting.google.com>...
> > srp@microtec.net (Andr? Michaud) wrote in message news:<562f286c.0409181148.44b6bce2@posting.google.com>...
> >
> > Hi, André
> >
> > > > Of course EM waves exist. Light is an EM wave.
> > >
> > > To my knowledge, since Wien and Planck, we know that this is no so.
> >
> > I think you're arguing about definitions here and not about reality.
> > There is enough evidence out there to indicate that light involves
> > electric and magnetic fields, whatever the underlying physical basis
> > of such fields is.
>
> I would rather formulate this as
>
> There is enough evidence out there to indicate that light involves
> discrete particles having both electric and magnetic aspects, whatever
> the underlying physical basis of such aspects may be.
Then too, as a working physicist I would prefer to describe the
situation as light having a well defined electromagnetic wave
characteristic which in some specific instances display particle
(photon) like properties in those rare situations where they exhibit
particle like properties. (Example: The photo-electric effect.)
I had thought that this matter had been put to bed back around 1910 or
1920, but then I may have been mistaken.
Einstein himself believed that a study of the dual properties of light
could well occupy someone for a lifetime, so we'll be very receptive
to your illumination of this subject for us.
Harry C.
- Next message: Old Man: "Re: Relativity is a nonmathematical nontheory"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Is a Crystal-clear Theory Preferable to Dogmatic Riddles?"
- In reply to: Andr? Michaud: "Re: wave and light"
- Next in thread: Andr? Michaud: "Re: wave and light"
- Reply: Andr? Michaud: "Re: wave and light"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|