Re: Following the U.S.'s lead.
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 09/20/04
- Next message: jahn: "Re: are gravitons needed?"
- Previous message: Rick: "Re: People f_cking around."
- In reply to: Jeff Relf: "Following the U.S.'s lead."
- Next in thread: Jeff Relf: "Dirt-poor computer nerds."
- Reply: Jeff Relf: "Dirt-poor computer nerds."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:51:17 -0400
What don't you understand about the conversion and conservation of
energy ?
You act like its just my idia and just ignore the fact that the
bonding energy is the interactions of gravity pushing in and motion and
wave interactions pushing out .
The energy releaced from nurton ejection was converted from friction
now that the push in and push out dont equal .
A photon electron nutron protron and all parts
can be converted to motion thats a gain in mass//energy.
In electric ...orbits overlap each other so a electron can orbit on
atom or the next atom with the less change in direction.
If the orbits dont overlap its insulation .
If the obits overlap but heres a bit of change in direction then its
resistance.
The change in direction will release some heat . A change in direction
of a nutron 2 million times bigger will release 2 million times more
heat than an electron . The electron is 1 millon times bigger than the
photon.
The electron s the ntence wave made by nurtons and protrons orbiting
the low they are falling into.
Light changes directions in the low of the atom so it wount slow down
,,and is ejected because it cant speed up.
Energy reacts with energy at C.
Light conducted threw space is a rize and fall in energy that cant
speed up so more energy will change directions more and still be
cohearant and at C ,,,a change in direction as it cant speed up and
must wait on time ,,the rate energy reacts with energy.
I burn a joint once in awile ..99,99 % of time Im strait .
I have 5400 tons of nickel pelets .
target tony gave up 150 tons fuel.
Target Paco Pac copper is next 21000 tons of copper . 5 weeks ahead
month 2 and 1/2
into a 6 month omegaventure 2.
7 wrecks relieved of their oil and cargo .
The 21000 tons of copper will take just 30 hours to load after 4 hours
running cables from its port side to our starboard side then putting our
water tank off the port side as counterweight and running all the crains
off the starord strait
into thier holds with rubber topped grabs .
100 ton bytes 200 bytes 50 each crane.
10 minutes a byte. it just dont take long.
for 2 mil you can get a tanker 800 feet long 120 feet wide that dont
run and dry dock it and put wenches on deck and put the cables thew
pipes threw the bottom ...pick 50 ton each and install 1000 of them .
I have a welder that will weld evry one to the side of a ship in a day.
50 ton wench with 20,000 feet cable $ $ 50,000
$ 50,000,000 bucks.
Thats insane but it picks 100,000 tons and from 10,000 feet. The
target is worth 400 million. With no one aboard it its just amps even
remote till its under the tanker.
3 to 5 knots is fine
we tow its ass to shore.
The drydock may take 2 months to rig and a tug pulls it out 14 mile
..yank...pulls it back.
We just go weld it to the wreck then pick that sucker up .
We might use the rig elsewhere .
The tanker has scrap tanks and barrels and the holds welded shut. Its
ready for the scrap yard when we get done playing with it.
It can pick up a 55000 ton panamax loaded bulker ,,stainless steel
coiled *** roles.
Thats a 440,000,000 million pick.
Its greased coil brand new stainless.
went down 5 years ago.
Ill weld staps down the sides of the wreck 10 feet long with the cable
conected.
- Next message: jahn: "Re: are gravitons needed?"
- Previous message: Rick: "Re: People f_cking around."
- In reply to: Jeff Relf: "Following the U.S.'s lead."
- Next in thread: Jeff Relf: "Dirt-poor computer nerds."
- Reply: Jeff Relf: "Dirt-poor computer nerds."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]