Re: are gravitons needed?
From: Old Man (nomail_at_nomail.net)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Harry Conover: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Re: India launches educational satellite"
- In reply to: DAH: "are gravitons needed?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: are gravitons needed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:49:36 -0500
"DAH" <dharder@bnl-dot-gov.no-spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:414f3f59_1@127.0.0.1...
> Uncle Al---"Gravitation is spacetime geometry."
>
> Old Man---"Gravitation puts tensor stresses on space and alters the
> space-time metric"
>
> If GR defines gravitation as an alteration in the geometry of
> spacetime, then why would exchange particles be required to
> produce the force of gravity at the quantum level?
Who says that gravitons are required ? Not Old Man
nor Uncle Al, and not GTR. So far, GTR is empirically
sufficient to all aspects of gravitation.
> Based upon the precepts
> of GR, wouldn't it be more logical to imagine that the gravitational
> field has its quantisation in a fundamental unit of spacetime
> alteration?
Cryogenic neutrons have been observed to fall in Earth's
surface gravity as predicted by non-relativistic QM.
There's no empirical justification for Quantization of the
gravitational field.
[Old Man]
> DAH 9/20/04
- Next message: Harry Conover: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Re: India launches educational satellite"
- In reply to: DAH: "are gravitons needed?"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: are gravitons needed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|