Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)
beliavsky_at_aol.com
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Previous message: Maleki: "Re: If humans became extinct tomorrow..."
- In reply to: nessuno: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Next in thread: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Sep 2004 15:39:22 -0700
nessuno@wigner.berkeley.edu (nessuno) wrote in message news:<f76c1166.0409201050.1d7bd2b@posting.google.com>...
<SNIP>
> Here is a question: Is there anything a general purpose programming
> language (like C) needs that a scientific programming language doesn't
> need? I don't think so, especially if you want to write large
> programs. The converse is not true, of course, there are special
> needs for scientific programs, like complex variables, and efficiency
> is paramount. So in an ideal world, we'd have just one language for
> both scientific programming and everything else.
I wonder if an applications programming language (as opposed to a
systems language like C) needs C-like pointers. Fortran 90 does have
something called POINTER, but it is more high-level than that of C. Do
any of Ada, (Visual) Basic, Java, Perl, Python etc. have C-like
pointers? The heavy use of pointers in C and C++ is associated with
many bugs and security problems and can make optimization more
difficult.
- Next message: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Previous message: Maleki: "Re: If humans became extinct tomorrow..."
- In reply to: nessuno: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Next in thread: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|