Re: Space, time, the works.
From: Constantine (Konstantinos.Kyritsis_at_durham.ac.uk)
Date: 09/22/04
- Next message: Randy Poe: "Re: Transverse speed in EM waves?"
- Previous message: Ken Muldrew: "Re: X-ray crystallography question"
- In reply to: Alex: "Space, time, the works."
- Next in thread: Paul Cardinale: "Re: Space, time, the works."
- Reply: Paul Cardinale: "Re: Space, time, the works."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:10:05 +0100
"Alex" <alex@fortworks.com> wrote in message
news:b71d3208.0409220559.1524fb27@posting.google.com...
> There's been something that's been bugging me, and I hope someone one
> here can point me in the right direction. First of all, time doesn't
> really exist. It's something that humans created to explain their
> world. If it doesn't exist, why is it that physics people are
> developing theorys about it, when it's something purely theoretical,
> that we invented? There's no proof that time really exists, or that
> there are "dimensions" or whatever you want to call them. Am I wrong
> in my assumtions here? Is there really time? Or is "special
> relativity" something we invented to account for the discrepencies in
> the system we have?
>
I can't resist to answer that... If you really believe that time does not
exist, try to explain that to your boss when he sucks you for being late.
Friendly, Kostas.
- Next message: Randy Poe: "Re: Transverse speed in EM waves?"
- Previous message: Ken Muldrew: "Re: X-ray crystallography question"
- In reply to: Alex: "Space, time, the works."
- Next in thread: Paul Cardinale: "Re: Space, time, the works."
- Reply: Paul Cardinale: "Re: Space, time, the works."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|