Re: Help for Atomic Simulation - Smart1234 Shows This And More..

From: S. Enterprize Company (smart1234_at_aol.com)
Date: 09/23/04


Date: 23 Sep 2004 02:17:15 GMT


>First, hi. This is my first post, and after careful perusing of the
>forum I *think* this post is in the correct place. Feel free to move
>it around if not, apologies.
>
>The meat of my questions. I'm a High School student that would like to
>simulate atoms on the computer. I've been getting help from alot of
>various sources, and therefore have a real hodgepodge of information.
>I'm not quite sure how it all fits together. And to top it off, I
>think there may be some math needed that I don't know yet (calculus,
>which I have next trimester). But I'm willing to learn :)
>
>I have been corresponding with a few chemistry professors. They have
>told me to start off small using the Lennard Jones potential. I
>understand the theory behind the potential quite well now (at medium
>distance, the two atoms in question are mildly attractive, and at
>short distances they are extremely repulsive. As the distance
>increases, the attraction rapidly drops off to about nothing). The LJ
>potential is as follows:
>
>http://www.fisica.uniud.it/~ercolessi/md/md/img20.gif
>
>Where E is the energy in joules/mol, epsilon is the depth of the well
>in joules/mol, sigma is the distance in angstroms for the interaction
>to occur. R is distance in angstroms between the two atoms. Both and
>are constants
>
>With that in mind, I was told this:
>
>>
>> The basic way to use the L-J potential, any potential really, is to
>take the derivative of it with respect to the distance between the
>atoms to get the force between the atoms. Since you know the mass of
>the atoms, you can then determine the acceleration acting on them.
>>From the acceleration and current velocity you can get their new
>velocity and ultimately the new position of the atoms some amount of
>time later.
>>
>
>And from here my questions start. Do I need to differentiate that
>equation? I don't know calculus, so I'm not sure if that is needed.
>Or does that merely mean plug in the distance to get the energy.
>
>>From there, I know the mass, as the quote says. Finding the
>acceleration is trivial (F=ma). The next part of my questions has to
>deal with the "ultimately finding the new positions" part. I have
>been told by a few people I will need to "integrate with respect to
>time". I've also been told by someone else that I don't need
>classical calculus, but instead need to use Euler's Integration, as
>that is the only way to do such a thing on the computer (I believe I
>understand this. Calculus is continuous, while the Euler integration
>assumes a constant value in between timesteps. If I were to use
>classical calc, I would have to reduce my timestep infintely to
>achive the results). But again, I have no idea, and could be talking
>out of my rear.
>
>Thanks, any help would be greatly appreciated. I am swimming in a sea
>of knowledge, but no real way to piece it together.
>
>BTW, this LaTex math function stuff is extremely cool :)
>
>
>EDIT: I forgot to mention, I've also heard of using the Verlet
>Algorithm for integratin instead of the others. Again, no idea if
>this is what I should aim for or not. Thanks again.

The QM Model is incorrect and the Standard Model is a poor excuse for a job.

 Here is the correct model 3d simulation of an atom at my Website. Here is a
Hydrogen atom. It is made of intelligent logical Helix Spiral Field interacting
structures, internally and externally.

   The world has rejected me and the Smart Model because they are to far behind
and primitive in science. The Smart Model is like an intelligently designed
computer. It has internal and external structures. The Standard Model is like
blowing up or colliding computers to see what flies out of it. If a IC chip
flies out after the collision then it is called a Quark or another particle.
The Smart Model is the only atomic and sub-atomic model with structure inside
and out. It is original and helped in the creation of this universe. Without
this model this universe and others don't exist, only choas and stupidity QM
Bull Crap exists. The QM model has contributed to the chaotic state of this
universe. The Smart Model tries to make corrections as much as it can. At least
the world after this one has a logical eternal structure without death. It is
worlds ( humans) with free will choice that help in making their own world. I
have already visited some other worlds, and just recently I visited one that
finally has a logical time flow of space and time. it can be observed in a
dream state or astral projections.

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Hydrogen1q.gif

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Deuterium3D.gif

   I am one of the Co-Creators of this universe. I helped establish the
universal fields that establish Free Will Choice Worlds. Even in the Holy Bible
and other religious books like the Quran etc..., show that Free Will Choice is
fundamental to a life existing being. Many have misunderstood what this has
meant in the fields, anti-fields and neutral zones fields of atomic and
universal structures.
    I am here to help enlighten people to the TRUTH. The Truth is that YOU can
also have your own world without limits ( you can do anything in your world,
WITH OR WHILE RESPECTING the free worlds of other beings. This particular world
( EARTH) has problems because there is lack of respect for the other
individual free worlds of each being and species. A corruption state occurs
when a person is invaded and things are taken from his/her world ( or home)
here on Earth. In the next world which was also Co-Created with the Smart
Model, YOU CAN FINALLY BE FREE and live and prosper. Some call the place
paradise. It is YOUR paradise. You can make your world Heaven or Hell.
Universes will remain parallel so that each individual universe with not
collide and disturb the others. This is the Truth. Many Prophets have talked
about the Truth. I show the Creation that THEY speak about. I am a Co-Creator.
Where is God? Well, He isn't some BIG ruling dictator that everyone expects. He
is a simple person like you and me that sets an example for others as a servant
so that space, energy matter and time isn't invaded by Him, so others can have
they own free space and time and world with other beings. So you can be free in
your own world.
    There is no Judgement Day, only a CHOICE Day. It doesn't matter what you
have done in the past because many problems were put on you against your will
to start with before you even had a choice. THEN you reacted in a counter
inappropriate way. ALL sins ARE forgiven because there IS NO SIN. Why? Because
most of the time people ask, why do people suffer and die? Well since they
don't understand or know why, they can't be guilty. So they have no sin. No
blood sacrifices are needed. Only enlightenment to the Truth is needed. This
Truth can be observed by you when you search for it.

 

Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: ghosts
    ... 100 % of all the energy that ever was is inside the universe. ... distance is perportional to space between. ... No 2 atoms can be 10 billion light years apart if BB laws are true. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
    ... about segments, and that there is no distance between segments? ... each consisting of 2 atoms. ... we are talking at the universe scale, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
    ... about segments, and that there is no distance between segments? ... each consisting of 2 atoms. ... we are talking at the universe scale, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Prove that hydrogen atoms exist in the universe
    ... proof of atoms. ... Fact building by consensus and arbitration. ... >> The epistemology of physics has to come to terms with the vagueness of ... Does the universe give special names to all ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: "Intelligent design"
    ... Go back to ancient Greek atoms. ... anything and then looks for evidence for it. ... Perhaps "Intelligent Design" ... >> find the universe and ourselves so complex, ...
    (alt.usage.english)