Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: The history of windows."
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- In reply to: nessuno: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Next in thread: Linønut: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:29:15 -0300
begin In <f76c1166.0409201050.1d7bd2b@posting.google.com>, on
09/20/2004
at 11:50 AM, nessuno@wigner.berkeley.edu (nessuno) said:
>Sounds like from what you have above that Fortran 95 passes length
>arguments along with array pointers. Sort of like what PL/I used to
>do with strings (they were called "dope vectors", i.e., the
>structures containing the length and pointer to the actual
>string).
Dope vectors were PL/I (F) technology; later PL/I compilers used
separate locators and descriptors, so that arrays with the same shape
could share the descriptor.
>So in an ideal world, we'd have just one language for
>both scientific programming and everything else.
That was the intent with PL/I. I'm hoping that the PL/I front end to
gcc flies.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: The history of windows."
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- In reply to: nessuno: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Next in thread: Linønut: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
