Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)
From: Linønut (linønut_at_bone.com)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: Mike Helland: "Re: Space, time, the works."
- Previous message: tadchem: "Re: Space, time, the works."
- Maybe in reply to: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Next in thread: Linønut: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:38:20 -0500
Error BR-549: MS DRM 1.0 rejects the following post from jmfbahciv@aol.com:
>>I used FORTRAN for quite awhile. When I found out about C, I felt
>>liberated.
>
> And whose math library did you use? Fortran's?
C's. For complex numbers, I wrote my own little library. Not very nice
notationally, of course. For FFT's, converted the code from IEEE. For
surface plotting, converted the code from Cosmic.
I see your point, but it was not much of an issue in the application domain
in which I worked at that time.
>>What is the most suitable language for developing and OS, and what OS
>>is developed using it?
>
> That all depends on what the OS is supposed to do. Choosing
> the implementation language is one piece of designing an operating
> system.
A helpful answer.
>>Ada? Ugh. To reminiscent of >chokes heaves pukes< Pascal.
>
> Some people think that way naturally. I call it programming
> style. Mr. Metz thinks very, very strangely from my POV ;-). You
> can guess what each guy's language of choice is by observing
> how they think.
I've been wondering about the thought processes of people who use
C# and Java.
> /BAH
Booz*Allen & Hamilton?
-- [X] Check here to always trust content from Linønut
- Next message: Mike Helland: "Re: Space, time, the works."
- Previous message: tadchem: "Re: Space, time, the works."
- Maybe in reply to: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Next in thread: Linønut: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]