Re: Extra Low Frequencies

From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 09/25/04 

Date: 25 Sep 2004 03:23:20 -0700

Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<4153785F.8CF0D768@hate.spam.net>...
> Angelo wrote:
> >
> > hi all
> >
> > I have to admit that this post of mine was in part
> > stimulated by reading the recent long debates between
> > Y.Porat and Bjoern Feuerbacher.
>
> Porat is an imbecile.
-----------
sorry i didnt notice that thread so i didnt respond
so
Hi old farter Schwartzy or whaever is your fucken real name"

welcome to the Fretz club!!!
your place there is now established

and if you can add some prove for that imbecilic notion
of the fertz - welcome!!
ie may be you can tell us what is the lowest em frequency
that was ever detected?
i mean not a series of em wave
but asingle one iow
what is the biggest wave length ever detected
if you didnt get it
i Fertz has the wave lenght of *one light year*
got it old disturbed- imbecil??
did you take your pills today ??
---------
a wave of one hertz for another instance
has the length of 300000 km !
---------------
btw how are you advancing with something else than mumbling
like a parrot
for instance
how many kilograms of diamonds have you conributed
to our civilization??

>
> > OTOH, even if I'm a
> > chemist, I've always been attracted by some branches
> > of physics and astronomy (both in an amateurish way,
> > though). For example, I was much interested in
> > constructing electric oscillators (at home, with
> > basical tools as single transistors, inductances,
> > and resistances) and possibly reaching the
> > _lowest frequencies_ attainable with such now outdated
> > and poor means (it was in mid-80s). It was basically a
> > two stage amplifier circuit in order to exploit a
> > positive feed-back, which was made frequency selective
> > by inserting an L and a C in the feed-back line (from
> > output to input). Well, I succeded in reaching (relalively)
> > stable oscillations whose period was as big as ca. 100
> > seconds IIRC, i.e. f = 10^-2 Hz. I monitored that period
> > by adding a third amplifying stage which would allow
> > lighten small lamps. So when Porat claims, IIRC, that
> > is impossible to go down '1 cycle per second' and keeps
> > ironically repeating about the Fertz, I wonder if he is
> > really convinced, or is cheating: the frequency has no
> > discontinuity at 1 Hz, and the 'second' is in no way a
> > special time interval, just a conventional one.
> > Anyway, if I misinterpreted Porat's ideas, though I think
> > it's highly improbable, I apologize in advance with him.
>
> ----------
to the previous poster:
the experimental facts are that there is no much lower than
i hertz
that is a bit far from one FERTZ!!!
--------------
now young genious from hedelberg -
 Feuerbacher the inventor of the FERTZ
saty away fo r awhile
schwartzy is a big boy
he can suply us with proves and suppoert for your Fertz
for which you are going to get the NObel together with
schwartz
schwartzy is going to get another one
for fooding us with huge diamons
the CO- Inor is ging to be worht nothing!!
------------
Y.Porat
-----------

Loading