Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)
From: Linønut (linønut_at_bone.com)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Linønut: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Physicists are firmly entrenched in the sensational promotion of archaic methodologies"
- Maybe in reply to: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Next in thread: Linønut: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 06:22:02 -0500
jmfbahciv@aol.com poked his little head through the XP firewall and said:
>>All I get on Google or Visimo is humbug <grin> or Booz*Allen.
>
> I don't believe that; if so, data garnering isn't working well.
How about you stop beating around the bush and give me a URL?
-- The only entities that care about Linux market share are commercial entities, and they represent only the tip of the iceberg. Penguins love icebergs.
- Next message: Linønut: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Physicists are firmly entrenched in the sensational promotion of archaic methodologies"
- Maybe in reply to: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Next in thread: Linønut: "Re: Fortran vs. C (was Re: Ken & Klaus.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
