sci.physics
By Thread

8276 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 09/30/04
Ending: 10/31/04

• Is (are) there any particle(s) that`s emitted in all directions? Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (10/31/04)
  • Re: Is (are) there any particle(s) that`s emitted in all directions? Uncle Al (10/31/04)
    • Re: Is (are) there any particle(s) that`s emitted in all directions? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/31/04)
  • Re: Is (are) there any particle(s) that`s emitted in all directions? Gen Gerhard Back (10/31/04)
• NASA Scientist Rips Bush on Global Warming Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/30/04)
• NASA scientist says Bush stifles global warming evidence Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/30/04)
• THE WAR ON SCIENCE Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/30/04)
  • Re: THE WAR ON SCIENCE Uncle Al (10/30/04)
• Methane Hydrates/ Clathrates melting enthalpy heiko ackermann (10/30/04)
  • Re: Methane Hydrates/ Clathrates melting enthalpy Uncle Al (10/30/04)
• Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true? Louis Nielsen (10/30/04)
  • Re: Is Einstein's Principle of Equivalence true? Uncle Al (10/30/04)
• I need man love Erissa (10/30/04)
  • Re: I need man love Buddy Matlosz (10/31/04)
    • Re: I need man love mark (10/31/04)
      • Re: I need man love Gen Gerhard Back (10/31/04)
  • Re: I need man love moT (10/31/04)
  • Re: I need man love Uncle Al (10/31/04)
    • Re: I need man love AAvK (10/31/04)
    • Re: I need man love robert j. kolker (10/31/04)
• F.B.I.'s Most Wanted *BACKS* John Kerry!! Nomen Nescio (10/30/04)
• FBI's Most Wanted *BACKS* John Kerry! Nomen Nescio (10/30/04)
• Anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Snis Pilbor (10/30/04)
  • Re: Anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Philip Holman (10/30/04)
  • Re: Anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Professor Gauss (10/30/04)
• superstable voltage or current generation Popescu Nicolae (10/30/04)
  • Re: superstable voltage or current generation jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/30/04)
  • Re: superstable voltage or current generation Uncle Al (10/30/04)
• How to built a universal clock Ken Seto (10/30/04)
  • Re: How to built a universal clock Sam Wormley (10/30/04)
  • Re: How to built a universal clock Eugene Shubert (10/30/04)
    • Re: How to built a universal clock robert j. kolker (10/30/04)
      • Re: How to built a universal clock Androcles (10/30/04)
      • Re: How to built a universal clock G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/30/04)
      • Re: How to built a universal clock Sam Wormley (10/31/04)
  • Re: How to built a universal clock Uncle Al (10/30/04)
• General Relativity Examined Omemrq (10/30/04)
  • Re: General Relativity Examined Sam Wormley (10/30/04)
  • Re: General Relativity Examined Uncle Al (10/30/04)
  • Re: General Relativity Examined robert j. kolker (10/30/04)
• Optical trap dates Egyptian water Sam Wormley (10/30/04)
• UHTREX reactor Baby Elian (10/30/04)
  • Re: UHTREX reactor Uncle Al (10/30/04)
    • Re: UHTREX reactor Baby Elian (10/30/04)
      • Re: UHTREX reactor Morituri-Max (10/30/04)
      • Re: UHTREX reactor tj Frazir (10/31/04)
• Q&A with Professor Didier Sornette Jacob Bettany (10/30/04)
• Micro Energy physico (10/30/04)
  • Re: Micro Energy Sam Wormley (10/30/04)
  • Re: Micro Energy Uncle Al (10/30/04)
  • Re: Micro Energy physico (10/30/04)
    • Re: Micro Energy Old Man (10/30/04)
    • Re: Micro Energy Sam Wormley (10/31/04)
  • Re: Micro Energy mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/30/04)
  • Re: Micro Energy Old Man (10/30/04)
• New Battery (2000 Wh/kg) with polymer -[C2(NO)2]n- electrode Karimi (10/30/04)
  • Re: New Battery (2000 Wh/kg) with polymer -[C2(NO)2]n- electrode Uncle Al (10/30/04)
• Squaring Circles Sam Wormley (10/30/04)
  • Re: Squaring Circles Uncle Al (10/30/04)
    • Re: Squaring Circles The Ghost In The Machine (10/30/04)
      • Re: Squaring Circles tj Frazir (10/31/04)
    • Re: Squaring Circles Edward Green (10/30/04)
• Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns ! Chris Torek (10/30/04)
  • Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns ! Patrick Powers (10/30/04)
  • Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns ! Patrick Powers (10/30/04)
    • Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns ! habshi (10/30/04)
      • Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns ! ZZBunker (10/30/04)
  • Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns ! Rene Tschaggelar (10/30/04)
  • Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns ! habshi (10/30/04)
• OT: A Better Keyboard Asetnil (10/30/04)
  • Re: OT: A Better Keyboard Mark Fergerson (10/30/04)
    • Re: OT: A Better Keyboard Asetnil (10/31/04)
  • Re: OT: A Better Keyboard jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/30/04)
    • Re: OT: A Better Keyboard Asetnil (10/30/04)
      • Re: OT: A Better Keyboard jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/30/04)
  • Re: OT: A Better Keyboard Uncle Al (10/30/04)
• ***THREE DAYS*** & Counting ! . . . Nomen Nescio (10/30/04)
  • Re: ***THREE DAYS*** & Counting ! . . . Jim Gerrie (10/30/04)
• Military Voters Disinfranchized Mitchell (10/30/04)
  • Re: Military Voters Disinfranchized Uncle Al (10/30/04)
    • Re: Military Voters Disinfranchized Morituri-Max (10/30/04)
      • Re: Military Voters Disinfranchized mitch perkins (10/31/04)
      • Re: Military Voters Disinfranchized Mitchell (10/31/04)
• What do ye think of this article? Tom (10/29/04)
  • Re: What do ye think of this article? Uncle Al (10/29/04)
  • re:What do ye think of this article? Tom (10/30/04)
    • Re: What do ye think of this article? Uncle Al (10/30/04)
• The Potential for Confusion Edward Green (10/29/04)
  • Re: The Potential for Confusion Old Man (10/30/04)
  • Re: The Potential for Confusion Old Man (10/30/04)
• USAF Black Programs in Weird Physics Jack Sarfatti (10/29/04)
• Sci Am index Maleki (10/29/04)
  • Re: Sci Am index mitch perkins (10/31/04)
• What's New -- Friday, October 29, 2004 Sam Wormley (10/29/04)
• USAF Funds Bad Physics? Jack Sarfatti (10/29/04)
  • Re: USAF Funds Bad Physics? Pedantus (10/29/04)
    • Re: USAF Funds Bad Physics? John Vreeland (10/29/04)
    • Re: USAF Funds Bad Physics? Jim Gerrie (10/30/04)
• Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." Robert Clark (10/29/04)
  • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." Uncle Al (10/29/04)
  • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." 'Hobbit's' skull (10/29/04)
    • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." Jim Gerrie (10/30/04)
  • Re: Further on "Rockets not carrying fuel." ZZBunker (10/30/04)
• Heisenberg's matrix mechanics David Macmanus (10/29/04)
• Liquids can exist in more than two different states simultaneously Sam Wormley (10/29/04)
• Is There a Force of Gravity? Senohpq (10/29/04)
  • Re: Is There a Force of Gravity? Sam Wormley (10/29/04)
  • Re: Is There a Force of Gravity? Uncle Al (10/29/04)
  • Re: Is There a Force of Gravity? Eddie Neutron (10/30/04)
• UK: Save £20+ on Feynman's lectures Malcolm (10/29/04)
• violation of microscopic reversibility Go_fly_a_kike (10/29/04)
• Why Scientists don't believe in one universe Mitchell (10/29/04)
  • Re: Why Scientists don't believe in one universe Bob Cain (10/29/04)
  • re:Why Scientists don't believe in one universe DAH (10/29/04)
  • Re: Why Scientists don't believe in one universe Uncle Al (10/29/04)
  • Re: Why Scientists don't believe in one universe mitch perkins (10/31/04)
• Can the universe spin? Rushtown (10/29/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Morituri-Max (10/29/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Sam Wormley (10/29/04)
    • Re: Can the universe spin? Morituri-Max (10/29/04)
    • Re: Can the universe spin? G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/29/04)
    • Re: Can the universe spin? Gregory L. Hansen (10/29/04)
      • Re: Can the universe spin? Old Man (10/30/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Old Man (10/29/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Old Man (10/29/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? George Jones (10/29/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Rich Lowe (10/29/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
    • Re: Can the universe spin? George Jones (10/29/04)
      • Re: Can the universe spin? Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
      • Re: Can the universe spin? tj Frazir (10/30/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Sam Wormley (10/29/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Uncle Al (10/29/04)
    • Re: Can the universe spin? George Jones (10/29/04)
      • Re: Can the universe spin? Uncle Al (10/29/04)
      • Re: Can the universe spin? Edward Green (10/30/04)
  • Re: Can the universe spin? Professor Gauss (10/30/04)
• *FOUR DAYS* Until Tuesday November 2nd 2004... Nomen Nescio (10/29/04)
• *FOUR* Days AND Counting!!! Nomen Nescio (10/29/04)
  • Re: *FOUR* Days AND Counting!!! Uncle Al (10/29/04)
• Kerry anti-war was really the communist's peace plan Mitchell (10/29/04)
  • Re: Kerry anti-war was really the communist's peace plan ato (10/29/04)
    • Re: Kerry anti-war was really the communist's peace plan Marcus Wellpoth (10/31/04)
  • Re: Kerry anti-war was really the communist's peace plan eleaticus (10/29/04)
• quick question vreyes_at_sdsc.edu (10/29/04)
  • Re: quick question Sam Wormley (10/29/04)
    • Re: quick question Ruud Lubbers (10/29/04)
      • Re: quick question Peter (10/29/04)
      • Re: quick question FrediFizzx (10/29/04)
      • Re: quick question mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/29/04)
      • Re: quick question Edward Green (10/30/04)
      • Re: quick question mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/30/04)
      • Re: quick question Old Man (10/30/04)
    • Re: quick question mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/29/04)
      • Re: quick question Sam Wormley (10/29/04)
• Re: quick question Jon Bell (10/29/04)
  • Re: quick question John T Lowry (10/29/04)
• Re: quick question Dr. Zarkov (10/29/04)
• Re: quick question Uncle Al (10/29/04)
• Re: quick question Old Man (10/29/04)
• Re: quick question Andr? Michaud (10/30/04)
  • Re: quick question tj Frazir (10/30/04)
  • Re: quick question Old Man (10/30/04)
• Photons Under Control Neutron (10/28/04)
  • Re: Photons Under Control Ian Stirling (10/28/04)
    • Re: Photons Under Control Ken S. Tucker (10/29/04)
      • Re: Photons Under Control Gregory L. Hansen (10/29/04)
• U.S. Consumers Get Cold Feet as Energy Costs Soar Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/28/04)
  • Re: U.S. Consumers Get Cold Feet as Energy Costs Soar Rene Tschaggelar (10/28/04)
    • Re: U.S. Consumers Get Cold Feet as Energy Costs Soar ato (10/29/04)
  • Re: U.S. Consumers Get Cold Feet as Energy Costs Soar tj Frazir (10/30/04)
• Re: animal poison on plants; Plant Kingdom the dual of Animal Kingdom Re: eating one Eounymus seed Archimedes Plutonium (10/28/04)
• AS OIL RISES, CLEANER ENERGY SURGES Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/28/04)
  • Re: AS OIL RISES, CLEANER ENERGY SURGES DESMODUS (10/29/04)
    • Re: AS OIL RISES, CLEANER ENERGY SURGES Morituri-Max (10/30/04)
    • Re: AS OIL RISES, CLEANER ENERGY SURGES tj Frazir (10/31/04)
• GREEN ENERGY GETS MORE ATTENTION Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/28/04)
  • Re: GREEN ENERGY GETS MORE ATTENTION Uncle Al (10/28/04)
• Stress-Energy Tensor for Zero Point Energy Jack Sarfatti (10/28/04)
• The Error in Relativistic Physics Desu23 (10/28/04)
• The Error in Relativistic Physics Desu23 (10/28/04)
  • Re: The Error in Relativistic Physics Uncle Al (10/28/04)
  • Re: The Error in Relativistic Physics Sam Wormley (10/28/04)
  • Re: The Error in Relativistic Physics robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
• sci.physics spam explained puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/28/04)
• capacitor: information alejo2083 (10/28/04)
  • Re: capacitor: information John Popelish (10/28/04)
• spectral lines for metals? JB (10/28/04)
  • Re: spectral lines for metals? Uncle Al (10/28/04)
• ScienceSpace - Chaos Neil Finlayson (10/28/04)
  • Re: ScienceSpace - Chaos Morituri-Max (10/28/04)
• Is it possible to make materials with high-temperature ionic superconductivity? Valery Ioffe (10/28/04)
  • Re: Is it possible to make materials with high-temperature ionic superconductivity? Uncle Al (10/28/04)
    • Re: Is it possible to make materials with high-temperature ionic ... tj Frazir (10/29/04)
    • Re: Is it possible to make materials with high-temperature ionic superconductivity? Valery Ioffe (10/30/04)
• Infrared Specific Reflection? apowers (10/28/04)
  • Re: Infrared Specific Reflection? Ian Stirling (10/28/04)
    • Re: Infrared Specific Reflection? Rene Tschaggelar (10/28/04)
  • Re: Infrared Specific Reflection? Rene Tschaggelar (10/28/04)
  • re:Infrared Specific Reflection? DAH (10/28/04)
  • Re: Infrared Specific Reflection? Uncle Al (10/28/04)
  • Re: Infrared Specific Reflection? Randy Poe (10/28/04)
    • Re: Infrared Specific Reflection? Teamwork Techniek (10/29/04)
  • re:Infrared Specific Reflection? DAH (10/29/04)
• Gravity NEUTRALIZING Air / Spacecraft or ZERO / REDUCED Gravity Chamber REM460 (10/28/04)
  • Re: Gravity NEUTRALIZING Air / Spacecraft or ZERO / REDUCED Gravity Chamber Sam Wormley (10/28/04)
  • Re: Gravity NEUTRALIZING Air / Spacecraft or ZERO / REDUCED Gravity Chamber Uncle Al (10/28/04)
• Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom then what about bacteria? Archimedes Plutonium (10/28/04)
  • Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom then what about bacteria? mountain man (10/28/04)
  • Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom then what about bacteria? Archimedes Plutonium (10/28/04)
    • Re: Plant kingdom the Quantum Dual Compliment of the Animal kingdom then what about bacteria? r norman (10/28/04)
• Question Deborah (10/28/04)
  • Re: Question Dave Baker (10/28/04)
    • Re: Question Deborah (10/28/04)
      • Re: Question Gregory L. Hansen (10/28/04)
      • Re: Question Paul Draper (10/28/04)
      • Re: Question Andy Resnick (10/28/04)
  • Energy and motion Miguel (10/28/04)
  • Re: Question Sam Wormley (10/28/04)
  • Re: Question Uncle Al (10/28/04)
  • Re: Question Old Man (10/28/04)
    • Re: Question Deborah (10/30/04)
• Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (10/28/04)
  • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Paul Murray (10/28/04)
    • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
    • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Morituri-Max (10/28/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Uncle Al (10/28/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Ken Muldrew (10/28/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Maleki (10/29/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' robert j. kolker (10/29/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Stephen Oakes (10/29/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' robert j. kolker (10/29/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Stephen Oakes (10/29/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Bob Ehrlich (10/29/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Maleki (10/29/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Joe Cummings (10/30/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Morituri-Max (10/30/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Bob Ehrlich (10/30/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Aidan Karley (10/30/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' robert j. kolker (10/30/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Aidan Karley (10/31/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Floyd L. Davidson (10/30/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' robert j. kolker (10/31/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Floyd L. Davidson (10/31/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Uncle Al (10/31/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Floyd L. Davidson (10/31/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' robert j. kolker (10/31/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Floyd L. Davidson (10/31/04)
  • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' stan the man (10/29/04)
    • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (10/29/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' Aidan Karley (10/29/04)
      • Re: Arafat 'in critical condition' stan the man (10/30/04)
• Q: properties of covariance matrices KY (10/28/04)
  • Re: Q: properties of covariance matrices Robert Israel (10/28/04)
    • Re: Q: properties of covariance matrices KY (10/28/04)
      • Re: Q: properties of covariance matrices zigoteau (10/29/04)
      • Re: Q: properties of covariance matrices KY (10/30/04)
    • Re: Q: properties of covariance matrices Ken S. Tucker (10/29/04)
• energy of wave interference tsmith (10/28/04)
  • Re: energy of wave interference Sam Wormley (10/28/04)
    • Re: energy of wave interference tsmith (10/28/04)
      • Re: energy of wave interference ZZBunker (10/28/04)
    • Re: energy of wave interference mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/28/04)
  • Re: energy of wave interference Jon Bell (10/28/04)
  • Re: energy of wave interference RP (10/28/04)
  • Re: energy of wave interference Uncle Al (10/28/04)
    • Re: energy of wave interference RP (10/29/04)
• Top scientists speak out against Bush policies Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/28/04)
• Sunspots hit new highs Sam Wormley (10/28/04)
  • Re: Sunspots hit new highs jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/28/04)
    • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Uncle Bob (10/28/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs RichA (10/28/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs OG (10/28/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs RichA (10/29/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs OG (10/29/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs OG (10/29/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Albert Nurick (10/29/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs John R. Copeland (10/29/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs OG (10/29/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Martin Frey (10/30/04)
    • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/30/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/30/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/30/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Pieter Litchfield (10/30/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Tom H. (10/30/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Martin Frey (10/30/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs starburst (10/30/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/31/04)
      • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/30/04)
  • Re: Sunspots hit new highs RichA (10/28/04)
  • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Tom Warner (10/28/04)
    • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Brian Tung (10/28/04)
  • re:Sunspots hit new highs DAH (10/28/04)
  • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Brian Tung (10/28/04)
  • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Pablo (10/28/04)
  • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Albert Nurick (10/29/04)
  • Re: Sunspots hit new highs moT (10/30/04)
  • Re: Sunspots hit new highs Boris Mohar (10/30/04)
• Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
  • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/28/04)
    • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
      • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Jacques Chirac (10/28/04)
    • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
  • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
    • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/29/04)
      • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/29/04)
      • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/29/04)
      • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/30/04)
      • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Sam Wormley (10/30/04)
      • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Bilge (10/30/04)
      • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/30/04)
    • Re: Respectable Physicist Pontificates in the Dark Eugene Shubert (10/29/04)
• Help with problem about friction Igor Y (10/28/04)
  • Re: Help with problem about friction Paul Draper (10/28/04)
  • Re: Help with problem about friction Mel Lep (10/28/04)
    • Re: Help with problem about friction Igor Y (10/29/04)
• Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/27/04)
  • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Old Man (10/28/04)
    • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR ad (10/28/04)
    • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/28/04)
      • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Old Man (10/28/04)
      • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/29/04)
      • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (10/29/04)
      • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/29/04)
      • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Androcles (10/29/04)
  • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (10/28/04)
    • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR greywolf42 (10/29/04)
      • Re: Long-Period Eclipsing Binary Stars and GR Myxococcus xanthus (10/31/04)
  • Re: What happened to Hammond? Uncle Al (10/28/04)
    • Re: What happened to Hammond? The Ghost In The Machine (10/28/04)
      • Re: What happened to Hammond? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/28/04)
      • Re: What happened to Hammond? Sam Wormley (10/28/04)
      • Re: What happened to Hammond? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/28/04)
    • Re: What happened to Hammond? Maleki (10/29/04)
  • Re: What happened to Hammond? Jim (10/28/04)
• What if the higgs don't exist.... James Landle (10/27/04)
  • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Uncle Al (10/28/04)
    • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Creighton Hogg (10/28/04)
    • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Richard Schultz (10/28/04)
  • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Jack Martinelli (10/28/04)
  • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... FrediFizzx (10/28/04)
  • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... RP (10/28/04)
  • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... ZZBunker (10/28/04)
  • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Michael Moroney (10/28/04)
    • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/28/04)
      • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Michael Moroney (10/29/04)
      • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... FrediFizzx (10/30/04)
  • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Ken Seto (10/28/04)
    • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/28/04)
      • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Ken Seto (10/29/04)
      • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/29/04)
      • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Ken Seto (10/30/04)
      • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Bruce Pew (10/30/04)
  • re:What if the higgs don't exist.... DAH (10/28/04)
  • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Mike Helland (10/28/04)
    • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
    • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Jack Martinelli (10/29/04)
      • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Mike Helland (10/29/04)
    • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Y.Porat (10/29/04)
      • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... James Landle (10/29/04)
      • Re: What if the higgs don't exist.... Y.Porat (10/30/04)
• FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Horace Heffner (10/27/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Uncle Al (10/27/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) CSharpner (10/28/04)
    • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Horace Heffner (10/28/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) CSharpner (10/29/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Horace Heffner (10/29/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) CSharpner (10/28/04)
• yellow orpiment powder source Kshana Bhangura (10/27/04)
  • Re: yellow orpiment powder source jacques jedwab (10/28/04)
  • Re: yellow orpiment powder source John Reilly (10/29/04)
• Fast Moving Water Frank Janchowski (10/27/04)
  • Re: Fast Moving Water Uncle Al (10/27/04)
  • Re: Fast Moving Water Old Man (10/27/04)
  • Re: Fast Moving Water The Ghost In The Machine (10/28/04)
  • Re: Fast Moving Water mars (10/28/04)
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 706 October 27, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (10/27/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 706 October 27, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Geoffrey A. Landis (10/29/04)
• How to get a life Charles Newton (10/27/04)
  • Re: How to get a life Uncle Al (10/27/04)
  • Re: How to get a life Morituri-Max (10/27/04)
  • Re: How to get a life Gregory L. Hansen (10/27/04)
  • Re: How to get a life JunkMan (10/27/04)
    • Re: How to get a life mitch perkins (10/28/04)
  • Re: How to get a life Sam Wormley (10/27/04)
    • Re: How to get a life Ken S. Tucker (10/28/04)
    • Re: How to get a life Mitchell (10/28/04)
      • Re: How to get a life Sam Wormley (10/28/04)
      • Re: How to get a life Creighton Hogg (10/28/04)
      • Re: How to get a life Mitchell (10/29/04)
  • Re: How to get a life ato (10/27/04)
    • Re: How to get a life Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (10/28/04)
  • Re: How to get a life Matt Whiting (10/27/04)
  • Re: How to get a life Jim (10/28/04)
  • Re: How to get a life Maleki (10/29/04)
• What's up with the pentaquark? Joe (10/27/04)
• Radio-Frequency Neon brewhaha_at_ecn.ab.ca (10/27/04)
  • Re: Radio-Frequency Neon Uncle Al (10/27/04)
    • Re: Radio-Frequency Neon robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
      • Re: Radio-Frequency Neon Uncle Al (10/27/04)
  • Re: Radio-Frequency Neon Old Man (10/28/04)
• "The Einstein Hoax " Ednolbwq (10/27/04)
  • Re: "The Einstein Hoax " Uncle Al (10/27/04)
  • Re: "The Einstein Hoax " Sam Wormley (10/27/04)
• mechanical systems madhuresh (10/27/04)
  • Re: mechanical systems Sam Wormley (10/27/04)
• software for metal atomic modelling Roberto (10/27/04)
• The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' Y.Porat (10/27/04)
  • Re: The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' FrankH (10/27/04)
    • Re: The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' Y.Porat (10/28/04)
    • Re: The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/29/04)
      • Re: The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
      • Re: The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' Y.Porat (10/30/04)
      • Re: The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' Eric Gisse (10/30/04)
      • Re: The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' FrankH (10/30/04)
      • Re: The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' Eric Gisse (10/30/04)
      • Re: The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story' The Ghost In The Machine (10/30/04)
• Re: TIME FLOW Mitchell (10/27/04)
• Matter is relative like Space and Time Mike Helland (10/27/04)
  • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/27/04)
    • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Moby Dikc (10/27/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Moby Dikc (10/27/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Morituri-Max (10/28/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Eric Gisse (10/28/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Morituri-Max (10/29/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Mike Helland (10/28/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Morituri-Max (10/29/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Mike Helland (10/29/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Morituri-Max (10/29/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Moby Dikc (10/29/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
  • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Uncle Al (10/27/04)
    • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Mike Helland (10/28/04)
      • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Morituri-Max (10/29/04)
  • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Eric Gisse (10/28/04)
  • Re: Matter is relative like Space and Time Paul Cardinale (10/28/04)
• A double entendre (how do you prove that he si not he?) Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (10/27/04)
  • Re: A double entendre (how do you prove that he si not he?) Will Twentyman (10/27/04)
  • Re: A double entendre (how do you prove that he si not he?) Fletch F Fletch (10/27/04)
• Physicists in the US have made the first high-speed nanomechanical memory element from single-crystal silicon wafers Sam Wormley (10/27/04)
  • Re: Physicists in the US have made the first high-speed nanomechanical memory element from single-crystal silicon wafers Jack Martinelli (10/27/04)
    • Re: Physicists in the US have made the first high-speed nanomechanical memory element from single-crystal silicon wafers puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/27/04)
      • Re: Physicists in the US have made the first high-speed nanomechanical memory element from single-crystal silicon wafers Jack Martinelli (10/27/04)
  • Re: Physicists in the US have made the first high-speed nanomechanical memory element from single-crystal silicon wafers Wayne Shanks (10/27/04)
• The Value of Winter Humidification robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
  • Re: The Value of Winter Humidification Gregory L. Hansen (10/27/04)
    • Re: The Value of Winter Humidification robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
    • Re: The Value of Winter Humidification Richard Herring (10/27/04)
  • Re: The Value of Winter Humidification Richard Herring (10/28/04)
  • Re: The Value of Winter Humidification Richard Herring (10/29/04)
• quibbles with special relativity David Bandel (10/26/04)
  • Re: quibbles with special relativity John Smith (10/26/04)
    • Re: quibbles with special relativity Old Man (10/27/04)
  • Re: quibbles with special relativity OG (10/26/04)
    • Re: quibbles with special relativity RP (10/27/04)
  • Re: quibbles with special relativity Old Man (10/27/04)
  • Re: quibbles with special relativity Uncle Al (10/27/04)
    • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (10/27/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Eric Gisse (10/27/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (10/27/04)
  • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (10/27/04)
    • Re: quibbles with special relativity Mike (10/27/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (10/27/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Edward Green (10/28/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Mike (10/28/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (10/28/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Mike (10/28/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Gregory L. Hansen (10/28/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Mike (10/29/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Paul Cardinale (10/29/04)
      • Re: quibbles with special relativity Mike (10/30/04)
  • Re: quibbles with special relativity Eric Gisse (10/27/04)
  • Re: quibbles with special relativity puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/27/04)
• A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Ken Seto (10/26/04)
  • Re: A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Sam Wormley (10/26/04)
    • Re: A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Ken Seto (10/27/04)
  • Re: A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Uncle Al (10/26/04)
    • Re: A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Ken Seto (10/27/04)
  • Re: A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Mark Fergerson (10/27/04)
    • Re: A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Ken Seto (10/27/04)
  • Re: A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Jim (10/28/04)
    • Re: A Brief Description of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) Ken Seto (10/28/04)
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 October 2004 Sam Wormley (10/26/04)
• Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? Jack Sarfatti (10/26/04)
  • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? DrPostman (10/26/04)
  • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? Sailcat (10/27/04)
    • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? EjP (10/27/04)
  • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? lensman1955 (10/28/04)
    • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? Morituri-Max (10/28/04)
    • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? DrPostman (10/28/04)
      • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? ZZBunker (10/28/04)
      • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? lensman1955 (10/29/04)
      • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? John Baker (10/29/04)
      • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? lensman1955 (10/29/04)
  • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? DrPostman (10/28/04)
  • Re: Philadelphia Experiment Real or Hoax? John Baker (10/28/04)
• NOW SIX Days & Counting . . .THIS MEANS WAR!!!! Nomen Nescio (10/26/04)
  • Re: NOW SIX Days & Counting . . .THIS MEANS WAR!!!! SweetGus the AssClown (10/27/04)
    • Re: NOW SIX Days & Counting . . .THIS MEANS WAR!!!! mitch perkins (10/27/04)
      • Re: NOW SIX Days & Counting . . .THIS MEANS WAR!!!! Ian Stirling (10/27/04)
      • Re: NOW SIX Days & Counting . . .THIS MEANS WAR!!!! mitch perkins (10/28/04)
      • Re: NOW SIX Days & Counting . . .THIS MEANS WAR!!!! Randy L. (10/30/04)
      • Re: NOW SIX Days & Counting . . .THIS MEANS WAR!!!! puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/28/04)
      • Re: NOW SIX Days & Counting . . .THIS MEANS WAR!!!! mitch perkins (10/29/04)
• Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock Eugene Shubert (10/26/04)
  • Re: Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock Tom Roberts (10/27/04)
    • Re: Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock Sam Wormley (10/27/04)
• Operation Troll Shoulder 10/26/2004 Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
• Orbits About Black Holes - Free Interactive Animation George Jones (10/26/04)
• A closer Mars orbit as the cause of its early "warm, wet period." Robert Clark (10/26/04)
  • Re: A closer Mars orbit as the cause of its early "warm, wet period." Uncle Al (10/26/04)
    • Re: A closer Mars orbit as the cause of its early "warm, wet period." nospam (10/27/04)
      • Re: A closer Mars orbit as the cause of its early "warm, wet period." Ralph Nesbitt (10/27/04)
    • Re: A closer Mars orbit as the cause of its early "warm, wet period." Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (10/28/04)
• GUT problems aSkeptic (10/26/04)
  • Re: GUT problems Gregory L. Hansen (10/26/04)
• Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity Rehtonaq (10/26/04)
  • Re: Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity Sam Wormley (10/26/04)
  • Re: Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity Uncle Al (10/26/04)
• How can rigid bodies exist? Erland Gadde (10/26/04)
  • Re: How can rigid bodies exist? Sam Wormley (10/26/04)
  • Re: How can rigid bodies exist? Andy Resnick (10/26/04)
  • Re: How can rigid bodies exist? Gregory L. Hansen (10/26/04)
  • Re: How can rigid bodies exist? Fidel in Casts (10/26/04)
  • Re: How can rigid bodies exist? Jack Martinelli (10/26/04)
• Re: Winter humidification wastes energy nicksanspam_at_ece.villanova.edu (10/26/04)
  • Re: Winter humidification wastes energy leader Fidel (10/26/04)
    • Re: Winter humidification wastes energy Don Klipstein (10/26/04)
      • Re: Winter humidification wastes energy `Abd-Allaah al-Mahdi (10/27/04)
      • Re: Winter humidification wastes energy Don Klipstein (10/27/04)
  • Re: Winter humidification wastes energy tj Frazir (10/26/04)
  • Re: Winter humidification wastes energy Stormin Mormon (10/27/04)
    • Re: Winter humidification wastes energy Steve_at_carolinabreezehvac (10/28/04)
  • Re: Winter humidification wastes energy AC (10/29/04)
• optical properties of FeN mathias (10/26/04)
• FOLOWING REPLY TO AN IRATE PARISHIONER Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (10/26/04)
  • Re: FOLOWING REPLY TO AN IRATE PARISHIONER Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (10/26/04)
    • Re: FOLOWING REPLY TO AN IRATE PARISHIONER Cory Bhreckan (10/26/04)
• Infrared Fluorescence... apowers (10/26/04)
  • Re: Infrared Fluorescence... Ken S. Tucker (10/26/04)
    • Re: Infrared Fluorescence... OG (10/26/04)
  • Re: Infrared Fluorescence... Andy Resnick (10/26/04)
    • Re: Infrared Fluorescence... Maleki (10/26/04)
  • Re: Infrared Fluorescence... tzavalas (10/27/04)
  • re:Infrared Fluorescence... DAH (10/27/04)
  • Re: Infrared Fluorescence... zigoteau (10/29/04)
    • Re: Infrared Fluorescence... G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/29/04)
      • Re: Infrared Fluorescence... Sam Wormley (10/29/04)
  • Re: Infrared Fluorescence... Boris Mohar (10/29/04)
• JUST SEVEN Days AND Counting . . . Nomen Nescio (10/26/04)
  • Re: JUST SEVEN Days AND Counting . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
    • Re: JUST SEVEN Days AND Counting . . . Rob (10/27/04)
  • Re: JUST SEVEN Days AND Counting . . . Manuel Joseph Din (10/26/04)
  • Re: JUST SEVEN Days AND Counting . . . Tom McDonald (10/27/04)
  • Re: JUST SEVEN Days AND Counting . . . Daniel Joseph Min (10/27/04)
    • Re: JUST SEVEN Days AND Counting . . . robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
  • Re: JUST SEVEN Days AND Counting . . . Nomen Nescio (10/27/04)
  • Re: JUST SEVEN Days AND Counting . . . mitch perkins (10/27/04)
• Sliding Blocks Problem caseys (10/26/04)
  • Re: Sliding Blocks Problem puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/26/04)
  • Re: Sliding Blocks Problem Randy Poe (10/26/04)
  • re:Sliding Blocks Problem caseys (10/26/04)
  • Re: Sliding Blocks Problem Dave Baker (10/26/04)
  • re:Sliding Blocks Problem caseys (10/27/04)
  • Re: Sliding Blocks Problem Edward Green (10/30/04)
• Please bring me up to date on magnetic monopole theories Paul Ciszek (10/26/04)
• Principle Moment of diatomic molecule fellow (10/25/04)
  • Re: Principle Moment of diatomic molecule George Jones (10/25/04)
• do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? J Jensen (10/25/04)
  • Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Edward Green (10/26/04)
    • Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? J Jensen (10/27/04)
  • Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? ZZBunker (10/28/04)
  • Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Ken S. Tucker (10/29/04)
    • Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? J Jensen (10/30/04)
  • Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? Daryl McCullough (10/29/04)
    • Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? J Jensen (10/30/04)
  • Re: do I understand co-variant vs. contra-variant? J Jensen (10/30/04)
• FTL by Down-converting Horace Heffner (10/25/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting Uncle Al (10/26/04)
    • Re: FTL by Down-converting RP (10/26/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting RP (10/26/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting Paul Cardinale (10/26/04)
    • Re: FTL by Down-converting TomGee (10/26/04)
    • Re: FTL by Down-converting John Schoenfeld (10/26/04)
    • Re: FTL by Down-converting Horace Heffner (10/27/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting Thomas Trotter (10/27/04)
    • Re: FTL by Down-converting Horace Heffner (10/27/04)
  • re:FTL by Down-converting DAH (10/27/04)
    • Re: FTL by Down-converting Uncle Al (10/28/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting Thomas Trotter (10/28/04)
• quantum chemistry Leonid (10/25/04)
  • Re: quantum chemistry John T Lowry (10/25/04)
    • Re: quantum chemistry Gregory L. Hansen (10/25/04)
• Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity Sam Wormley (10/25/04)
• AAAS Call for Posters - Deadline Nov. 14, 2004 aaasmeeting (10/25/04)
• Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eckard Blumschein (10/25/04)
  • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eugene Shubert (10/25/04)
    • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eugene Shubert (10/25/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm YBM (10/25/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm the Knesset (10/25/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/25/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eckard Blumschein (10/26/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/26/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eugene Shubert (10/26/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eugene Shubert (10/26/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eugene Shubert (10/28/04)
      • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
    • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eckard Blumschein (10/26/04)
    • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eckard Blumschein (10/26/04)
    • Re: Uncle Al's brain, heart, and charm Eckard Blumschein (10/26/04)
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 25, 2004 PhDs.org Webmaster (10/25/04)
• One-dimensional heat equation Ken Honda (10/25/04)
  • Re: One-dimensional heat equation Rouben Rostamian (10/25/04)
    • Re: One-dimensional heat equation puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/25/04)
  • Re: One-dimensional heat equation David Bernier (10/25/04)
  • Re: One-dimensional heat equation mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/25/04)
  • Re: One-dimensional heat equation Robert Israel (10/25/04)
  • Re: One-dimensional heat equation Mohan Pawar (10/25/04)
    • Re: One-dimensional heat equation Ken Honda (10/25/04)
      • Re: One-dimensional heat equation Rouben Rostamian (10/25/04)
      • Re: One-dimensional heat equation Ken Honda (10/25/04)
      • Re: One-dimensional heat equation Robert Israel (10/25/04)
      • Re: One-dimensional heat equation Ken Honda (10/27/04)
      • Re: One-dimensional heat equation Robert Israel (10/27/04)
• DNA structure Kirk (10/25/04)
  • Re: DNA structure Sam Wormley (10/25/04)
    • Re: DNA structure Uno (10/25/04)
• Re: Capt kirk to really boldly go nightbat (10/25/04)
  • Re: Capt kirk to really boldly go Imperishable Stars (10/25/04)
• RAF Spitfire Warp Drive Jaguar Class 21st Century Concept Fighter Jack Sarfatti (10/25/04)
  • Re: RAF Spitfire Warp Drive Jaguar Class 21st Century Concept Fighter Jack Martinelli (10/25/04)
• "Sputtering" Flame mitch perkins (10/25/04)
  • Re: "Sputtering" Flame Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
    • Re: "Sputtering" Flame mitch perkins (10/25/04)
      • Re: "Sputtering" Flame Ken S. Tucker (10/26/04)
      • Re: "Sputtering" Flame mitch perkins (10/28/04)
      • Re: "Sputtering" Flame mitch perkins (10/28/04)
      • Re: "Sputtering" Flame mitch perkins (10/29/04)
• Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminalinformation transfer. nightbat (10/25/04)
  • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminalinformation transfer. Greysky (10/25/04)
• **theory-edge** mailing list V.Z.Nuri (10/25/04)
  • Re: **theory-edge** mailing list Dave Smith (10/25/04)
• Why Does God Hate Paul Nixon -- Part XIX AbsolutelyCertain (10/25/04)
• Lagrange Points John Baez (10/25/04)
  • Re: Lagrange Points - URL not found JEMebius (10/25/04)
  • Re: Lagrange Points Robert Israel (10/25/04)
  • Re: Lagrange Points Chan-Ho Suh (10/25/04)
  • Re: Lagrange Points Sam Wormley (10/25/04)
  • Re: Lagrange Points Uncle Al (10/25/04)
    • Re: Lagrange Points Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
      • Re: Lagrange Points Uncle Al (10/26/04)
      • Re: Lagrange Points John Baez (10/26/04)
      • Re: Lagrange Points Ken S. Tucker (10/26/04)
      • Re: Lagrange Points George Dishman (10/27/04)
      • Re: Lagrange Points Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
  • Re: Lagrange Points Narasimham G.L. (10/25/04)
    • Re: Lagrange Points Uncle Al (10/25/04)
      • Re: Lagrange Points Narasimham G.L. (10/26/04)
      • Re: Lagrange Points Uncle Al (10/26/04)
    • Re: Lagrange Points Robert Israel (10/26/04)
      • Re: Lagrange Points John M. Gamble (10/27/04)
      • Re: Lagrange Points ZZBunker (10/28/04)
• New single molecular layer graphene for solar sail material? Robert Clark (10/24/04)
  • Re: New single molecular layer graphene for solar sail material? Uncle Al (10/24/04)
• Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? Paul Stowe (10/24/04)
  • Re: Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? Androcles (10/24/04)
  • Re: Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (10/24/04)
    • Re: Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? Paul Stowe (10/25/04)
      • Re: Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (10/28/04)
  • Re: Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? Uncle Al (10/24/04)
    • Re: Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? Paul Stowe (10/26/04)
      • Re: Pushing Gravity, what do independent reviews say about this book? Uncle Al (10/27/04)
• What is the best way to heat a pool ? habshi (10/24/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? habshi (10/24/04)
    • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? Rugova (10/24/04)
      • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
    • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? ZZBunker (10/25/04)
      • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? harmony (10/25/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/24/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? Uncle Al (10/24/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? tj Frazir (10/25/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? Eric Gisin (10/25/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? habshi (10/25/04)
    • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? Randy Poe (10/25/04)
    • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? habshi (10/25/04)
      • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? AC (10/29/04)
      • Dam the Med habshi (10/26/04)
      • Re: Dam the Med Uncle Al (10/26/04)
      • Re: Dam the Med tj Frazir (10/26/04)
      • Re: Dam the Med Don Kelly (10/27/04)
      • Re: Dam the Med puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/27/04)
      • Re: Dam the Med habshi (10/27/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? habshi (10/26/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? habshi (10/26/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/26/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? harmony (10/26/04)
    • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? tj Frazir (10/26/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? habshi (10/27/04)
    • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/27/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? Maleki (10/27/04)
  • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
    • Re: What is the best way to heat a pool ? N. Thornton (10/30/04)
• Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Uncle Al (10/24/04)
    • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. robert j. kolker (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
    • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Greysky (10/26/04)
    • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/27/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (10/27/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (10/28/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/28/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. bernard.chaverondier (10/29/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/30/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. chaverondier (10/31/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. RP (10/31/04)
  • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Androcles (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Luigi Caselli (10/24/04)
    • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Paul Lawler (10/24/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Bill Hobba (10/25/04)
      • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
    • Re: Why it is impossible to reverse temporal ordering in superluminal information transfer. N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/25/04)
• How does one make a neutron bomb? George Cox (10/24/04)
  • Re: How does one make a neutron bomb? Greysky (10/24/04)
  • Re: How does one make a neutron bomb? greywolf42 (10/24/04)
    • Re: How does one make a neutron bomb? Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/25/04)
  • Re: How does one make a neutron bomb? Uncle Al (10/24/04)
  • Re: How does one make a neutron bomb? mitch perkins (10/25/04)
  • Re: How does one make a neutron bomb? George Cox (10/26/04)
• Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Lecnach (10/24/04)
  • Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Sam Wormley (10/24/04)
  • Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Gregory L. Hansen (10/24/04)
  • Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Uncle Al (10/24/04)
• Re: Einstein Jim Carr (10/24/04)
• forgery as a signalling device Re: Is this a Microsoft program of Archimedes Plutonium (10/24/04)
• Conservation of Mass and Energy and Space Flight Garry (10/24/04)
  • Re: Conservation of Mass and Energy and Space Flight Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
  • Re: Conservation of Mass and Energy and Space Flight Uncle Al (10/24/04)
  • Re: Conservation of Mass and Energy and Space Flight Ibrahim Rugova (10/24/04)
• "Steve" King on "Steve" Gould Maleki (10/24/04)
• Re: Static Question operator jay (10/24/04)
  • Re: Static Question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/24/04)
    • Re: Static Question garth (10/24/04)
      • Re: Static Question operator jay (10/24/04)
      • Re: Static Question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/24/04)
      • Re: Static Question garth (10/24/04)
  • Re: Static Question zigoteau (10/24/04)
    • Re: Static Question garth (10/24/04)
      • Re: Static Question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/24/04)
      • Re: Static Question garth (10/24/04)
      • Re: Static Question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/24/04)
      • Re: Static Question garth (10/24/04)
      • Re: Static Question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/25/04)
      • Re: Static Question garth (10/25/04)
      • Re: Static Question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/25/04)
      • Re: Static Question garth (10/25/04)
• A very ordinary question Edward Green (10/24/04)
  • Re: A very ordinary question zigoteau (10/24/04)
    • Re: A very ordinary question Edward Green (10/24/04)
• Inflation Must be a Force Stronger than Gravity Mitchell (10/24/04)
  • Re: Inflation Must be a Force Stronger than Gravity RP (10/24/04)
  • Re: Inflation Must be a Force Stronger than Gravity Uncle Al (10/24/04)
  • Re: Inflation Must be a Force Stronger than Gravity Mitchell (10/25/04)
    • Re: Inflation Must be a Force Stronger than Gravity G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/25/04)
      • Re: Inflation Must be a Force Stronger than Gravity Mitchell (10/26/04)
    • Re: Inflation Must be a Force Stronger than Gravity mitch perkins (10/28/04)
  • Re: Inflation Must be a Force Stronger than Gravity FrankH (10/27/04)
    • Re: Inflation Must be a Force Stronger than Gravity RP (10/28/04)
• nonstationary states TJ (10/24/04)
  • Re: nonstationary states N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/24/04)
    • Re: nonstationary states John T Lowry (10/24/04)
      • Re: nonstationary states tadchem (10/24/04)
      • Re: nonstationary states John T Lowry (10/24/04)
      • Re: nonstationary states zigoteau (10/24/04)
  • Re: nonstationary states Jim Black (10/25/04)
• Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
  • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
    • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
    • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Jim Black (10/25/04)
      • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Ivana Blokkemaal (10/25/04)
  • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. RP (10/24/04)
    • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
    • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Y.Porat (10/25/04)
  • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Uncle Al (10/24/04)
    • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Eric Gisse (10/25/04)
  • Re: Small request for those who are tired of people like eleaticus and retchier. Andy Resnick (10/25/04)
• PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN O CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (10/23/04)
  • Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN O CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY robert j. kolker (10/24/04)
  • Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN O CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY Hu (10/24/04)
• GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (10/23/04)
• Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities eleaticus (10/23/04)
  • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/29/04)
    • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Eric Gisse (10/30/04)
      • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/30/04)
      • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Titan Point (10/30/04)
      • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/30/04)
      • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/30/04)
      • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/30/04)
      • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/30/04)
      • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/30/04)
      • Re: Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/31/04)
• Though Experiment Gremlin (10/23/04)
  • Re: Thought Experiment Philip Holman (10/24/04)
    • Re: Thought Experiment Gremlin (10/24/04)
  • Re: Though Experiment Edward Green (10/24/04)
    • Re: Though Experiment Gremlin (10/24/04)
  • Re: Though Experiment ZZBunker (10/24/04)
• PRESIDENTIAL TIMBER! Not Bush, Kerry Ed Conrad (10/23/04)
• Do pressures add up? SomeOne (10/23/04)
  • Re: Do pressures add up? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/23/04)
  • Re: Do pressures add up? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/23/04)
  • Re: Do pressures add up? Ian Stirling (10/23/04)
  • Re: Do pressures add up? tadchem (10/23/04)
  • Re: Do pressures add up? Edwin L. Bondoc (10/24/04)
    • Re: Do pressures add up? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/24/04)
      • Re: Do pressures add up? Edwin L. Bondoc (10/24/04)
      • Re: Do pressures add up? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/24/04)
  • Re: Do pressures add up? Edward Green (10/24/04)
    • Re: Do pressures add up? SomeOne (10/24/04)
  • Re: Do pressures add up? Herman Family (10/24/04)
• polar vs equatorial gravity zxcv (10/23/04)
  • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity John T Lowry (10/23/04)
    • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity RP (10/23/04)
    • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity Edward Green (10/24/04)
  • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity Uncle Al (10/23/04)
  • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity maison.mousse (10/23/04)
  • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/23/04)
  • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity Gene Nygaard (10/23/04)
  • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity Edward Green (10/24/04)
    • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity don findlay (10/24/04)
    • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity zxcv (10/24/04)
      • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity don findlay (10/25/04)
      • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity Edward Green (10/27/04)
    • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity Tim K. (10/24/04)
      • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity Edward Green (10/26/04)
      • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity Tim K. (10/27/04)
      • Re: polar vs equatorial gravity Tim K. (10/27/04)
• Re: WI the Earth would be a moon of a giant planet Orbitan (10/23/04)
  • Re: WI the Earth would be a moon of a giant planet Ian Stirling (10/23/04)
    • Re: WI the Earth would be a moon of a giant planet Earl Colby Pottinger (10/23/04)
    • Re: WI the Earth would be a moon of a giant planet Mr. 4X (10/23/04)
  • Re: WI the Earth would be a moon of a giant planet Mr. 4X (10/23/04)
    • Re: WI the Earth would be a moon of a giant planet Brian Davis (10/24/04)
      • Re: WI the Earth would be a moon of a giant planet Mr. 4X (10/25/04)
• Nature is not Self-Acting Eugene Shubert (10/23/04)
  • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Dirk Van de moortel (10/23/04)
    • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Eugene Shubert (10/23/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Mitchell (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting RP (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Mitchell (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting RP (10/26/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Mitchell (10/26/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting RP (10/26/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Eugene Shubert (10/30/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Morituri-Max (10/30/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting tj Frazir (10/31/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting mitch perkins (10/25/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Eugene Shubert (10/25/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting ZZBunker (10/25/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting mitch perkins (10/25/04)
  • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Uncle Al (10/23/04)
  • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Sam Wormley (10/24/04)
    • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Sam Wormley (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
  • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
    • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
    • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Mitchell (10/24/04)
  • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Mike (10/24/04)
    • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
      • Re: Nature is not Self-Acting Malcolm (10/26/04)
• Mathematical anecdotes don't always tell the whole truth.... Sam Wormley (10/23/04)
• Graphite in Flatland: Carbon sheets may rival nanotubes Sam Wormley (10/23/04)
• What's the "quantum electrodynamic threshold"? Daniel Boese (10/23/04)
• Re: Heisenberg uncertainty principle meanings Bob Cain (10/23/04)
  • Re: Heisenberg uncertainty principle meanings zigoteau (10/23/04)
    • Re: Heisenberg uncertainty principle meanings Bob Cain (10/24/04)
      • Re: Heisenberg uncertainty principle meanings zigoteau (10/24/04)
    • Re: Heisenberg uncertainty principle meanings Edward Green (10/24/04)
      • Re: Heisenberg uncertainty principle meanings zigoteau (10/26/04)
  • Re: Heisenberg uncertainty principle meanings Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/23/04)
    • Re: Heisenberg uncertainty principle meanings Bob Cain (10/24/04)
      • Re: Heisenberg uncertainty principle meanings ZZBunker (10/24/04)
• Re: Jed Sefirot interviewed by Archibald Balthezar Monkey FourSevenZeroOne (10/23/04)
• Political appointees hanson (10/23/04)
  • Re: Political appointees Roger Coppock (10/25/04)
    • Re: Political appointees hanson (10/25/04)
• Is element 123 edible ? ? ? Karl-Hugo Weesberg (10/23/04)
  • Re: Is element 123 edible ? ? ? Mark J Winter (10/23/04)
    • Re: Is element 123 edible ? ? ? The Ghost In The Machine (10/25/04)
    • Re: Is element 123 edible ? ? ? Paul Cardinale (10/26/04)
  • Re: Is element 123 edible ? ? ? Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
    • Re: Is element 123 edible ? ? ? operator jay (10/26/04)
      • Re: Is element 123 edible ? ? ? Ken S. Tucker (10/26/04)
• Galactic halo is not a hedgehog Jack Sarfatti (10/23/04)
  • Re: Galactic halo is not a hedgehog Porky Pig Jr (10/24/04)
• Not turtles, it's hedgehogs - Pioneer 10/11 Dark Energy Anomaly Jack Sarfatti (10/23/04)
  • Re: Not turtles, it's hedgehogs - Pioneer 10/11 Dark Energy Anomaly Idiot spotter (10/23/04)
    • Re: Not turtles, it's hedgehogs - Pioneer 10/11 Dark Energy Anomaly Sue (10/28/04)
      • Re: Not turtles, it's hedgehogs - Pioneer 10/11 Dark Energy Anomaly Robert Morpheal (10/29/04)
• Registered Republican Voters . . . Nomen Nescio (10/23/04)
  • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . ed4linda (10/23/04)
    • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/23/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/23/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . zolota (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . zolota (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/23/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Daniel Joseph Min (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Doug Weller (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Nomen Nescio (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Nomen Nescio (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . OhBrother (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Eric Stevens (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . robert j. kolker (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Richard Henry (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Richard Henry (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Richard Henry (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Eric Stevens (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Richard Henry (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Hadji (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . j w (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . wbarwell (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Richard Henry (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Richard Henry (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Richard Henry (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . zolota (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . zolota (10/29/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . AM (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/26/04)
    • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . I.E. Johansson (10/23/04)
    • The Fatigue Of Spirit (was: Registered Republican Voters . . .) Alfred Einstead (10/24/04)
      • Re: The Fatigue Of Spirit (was: Registered Republican Voters . . .) George Dishman (10/24/04)
      • Re: The Fatigue Of Spirit (was: Registered Republican Voters . . .) Alfred Einstead (10/26/04)
      • Re: The Fatigue Of Spirit (was: Registered Republican Voters . . .) Alfred Einstead (10/26/04)
    • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Doug Weller (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/24/04)
  • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Alfred Einstead (10/24/04)
    • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Alfred Einstead (10/26/04)
  • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . mitch perkins (10/25/04)
  • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
    • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
  • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Tom McDonald (10/25/04)
    • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Richard Henry (10/26/04)
    • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
  • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Creighton Hogg (10/26/04)
  • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/26/04)
    • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Creighton Hogg (10/27/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . Gregory L. Hansen (10/27/04)
      • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/27/04)
    • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/27/04)
  • Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/27/04)
• Making silicon nanoparticles in plasmas at room temps Sam Wormley (10/23/04)
• NOW JUST *10* Days & Counting(!). . . Nomen Nescio (10/23/04)
  • Re: NOW JUST *10* Days & Counting(!). . . pragmatist (10/26/04)
    • Re: NOW JUST *10* Days & Counting(!). . . Phil Wheeler (10/26/04)
• God Mitchell (10/23/04)
  • Re: God Uncle Al (10/23/04)
    • Re: God G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/24/04)
      • Re: God Sam Wormley (10/25/04)
      • Re: God Mitchell (10/25/04)
      • Re: God Sam Wormley (10/25/04)
      • Re: God G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/25/04)
      • Re: God Sam Wormley (10/25/04)
• NOW JUST *10* Days & Counting(!). . . starwars (10/23/04)
  • Re: NOW JUST *10* Days & Counting(!). . . Jacques Guy (10/25/04)
  • Re: NOW JUST *10* Days & Counting(!). . . james (10/25/04)
• GR and Stronger Gravity At a Distance Mitchell (10/23/04)
  • Re: GR and Stronger Gravity At a Distance Uncle Al (10/23/04)
  • Re: GR and Stronger Gravity At a Distance Morituri-Max (10/23/04)
• Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
• Well, Bilge? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
  • Re: Well, Bilge? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/23/04)
    • Re: Well, Bilge? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
  • Re: Well, Bilge? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/23/04)
    • Re: Well, Bilge? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Well, Bilge? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/24/04)
• FAQ's: The Online Fraud Nth Complexity (10/22/04)
  • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Uncle Al (10/23/04)
  • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Idiot spotter (10/23/04)
  • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Nth Complexity (10/23/04)
  • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Nth Complexity (10/23/04)
  • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Dirk Van de moortel (10/23/04)
  • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Nth Complexity (10/25/04)
    • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Dirk Van de moortel (10/25/04)
    • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Paul Draper (10/27/04)
      • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Jim Greenfield (10/28/04)
      • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
  • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud The Ghost In The Machine (10/25/04)
    • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Jim Greenfield (10/27/04)
  • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Nth Complexity (10/26/04)
    • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
      • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud Myxococcus xanthus (10/27/04)
    • Re: FAQ's: The Online Fraud The Ghost In The Machine (10/27/04)
• OH NO EINSTEIN PROVED RIGHT AGAIN!!!!! Darkwing Duck (10/22/04)
• praseodymium-boron-iron DAH (10/22/04)
  • Re: praseodymium-boron-iron Andr? Michaud (10/25/04)
• What's New -- Friday, October 22, 2004 by Bob Park Sam Wormley (10/22/04)
• HELP!!! Jittanonta (10/22/04)
  • Re: HELP!!! Mr. Veerappan (10/22/04)
  • Re: HELP!!! richard miller (10/22/04)
  • Re: HELP!!! Garry (10/23/04)
  • Re: HELP!!! operator jay (10/23/04)
  • Re: HELP!!! Jim Black (10/23/04)
• Scientists Obtain Evidence Earth's Spin Twists Space-Time Around It Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/22/04)
  • HE'S BA-ACK! Re: Scientists Obtain Evidence Earth's Spin Twists Space-Time Around It Art Deco (10/23/04)
    • Re: HE'S BA-ACK! Re: Scientists Obtain Evidence Earth's Spin Twists Space-Time Around It DrPostman (10/23/04)
• Direct evidence of frame-dragging found? MrPepper11 (10/22/04)
• Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Gnivrac (10/22/04)
  • Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Sam Wormley (10/22/04)
  • Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? John C. Polasek (10/22/04)
  • Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? John C. Polasek (10/22/04)
  • Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Uncle Al (10/22/04)
• How much bigger is the tiniest wave over a particle like the Neutron? G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/22/04)
  • Re: How much bigger is the tiniest wave over a particle like the Neutron? psichi (10/22/04)
• Re: Hammond sees the obvious? GK_at_pt.lu (10/22/04)
  • Re: Hammond sees the obvious? tadchem (10/23/04)
    • Re: Hammond sees the obvious? GK_at_pt.lu (10/25/04)
• THANK YOU ! Ed Conrad (10/22/04)
• Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (10/22/04)
  • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (10/22/04)
  • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report alanm (10/22/04)
  • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report RT (10/22/04)
  • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report Greg Campbell (10/22/04)
    • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report Greg Campbell (10/22/04)
      • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report stan the man (10/23/04)
      • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (10/23/04)
      • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report alanm (10/23/04)
  • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/27/04)
    • Re: Strong Earth tides can trigger earthquakes, UCLA scientists report Sam Wormley (10/27/04)
• *11* Days & Counting(!)... Nomen Nescio (10/22/04)
• A virus from John Baez Jack Martinelli (10/22/04)
• Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption Morituri-Max (10/22/04)
• a new type of cooper pair? corr (10/22/04)
  • Re: a new type of cooper pair? John Sefton (10/22/04)
  • Re: a new type of cooper pair? Uncle Al (10/22/04)
  • Re: a new type of cooper pair? Gregory L. Hansen (10/22/04)
    • Re: a new type of cooper pair? Creighton Hogg (10/22/04)
      • Re: a new type of cooper pair? Gregory L. Hansen (10/22/04)
      • Re: a new type of cooper pair? hanson (10/23/04)
      • Re: a new type of cooper pair? Gregory L. Hansen (10/23/04)
• Carbon goes ballistic Sam Wormley (10/22/04)
• SCARED STIFF! That's YOU, talk.origins Ed Conrad (10/22/04)
  • Re: SCARED STIFF! That's YOU, talk.origins Ed Conrad (10/22/04)
• Well, Van Jacques? eleaticus (10/22/04)
  • Re: Well, Van Jacques? Uncle Al (10/22/04)
    • Uncle assAl-ry number 88874 eleaticus (10/23/04)
• Kuiper Belt Jack Sarfatti (10/21/04)
  • Re: Kuiper Belt Uncle Al (10/22/04)
• NASA Pioneer 10/11 Anomalies and Kuiper Belt Jack Sarfatti (10/21/04)
  • Re: NASA Pioneer 10/11 Anomalies and Kuiper Belt Jonathan Silverlight (10/22/04)
• C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/21/04)
  • Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption Uncle Al (10/21/04)
  • Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/22/04)
    • Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/23/04)
      • Uncle assAl-ry number 43 eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 43 David Evens (10/25/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 43 eleaticus (10/25/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 43 David Evens (10/26/04)
      • Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Well, ZZBunker? Re: C. Lorentz Coord. Xforms vs SR-cult Fraud and Corruption ZZBunker (10/23/04)
• B. Newtonian Micheslon-Morley vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/21/04)
  • Re: B. Newtonian Micheslon-Morley vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/21/04)
    • Re: B. Newtonian Micheslon-Morley vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) John Sefton (10/22/04)
    • Re: B. Newtonian Micheslon-Morley vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Brian Quincy Hutchings (10/22/04)
• A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/21/04)
  • Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/21/04)
  • Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/21/04)
    • Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
      • Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Daryl McCullough (10/22/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Androcles (10/22/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Uncle AssAl-ery number 4003. eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Daryl McCullough (10/22/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Daryl McCullough (10/23/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Paul Draper (10/22/04)
      • Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
      • Lordy, Hobba, get it straight. Or are you that incompetent? eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Lordy, Hobba, get it straight. Or are you that incompetent? Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
      • Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) ZZBunker (10/23/04)
      • Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/23/04)
      • Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Mike (10/23/04)
      • Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
      • Re: Yes, Paul?Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Androcles (10/23/04)
      • The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/23/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/23/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/24/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/24/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Bill Hobba (10/24/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/25/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/25/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/25/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/26/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/26/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! eleaticus (10/26/04)
      • Re: The genius Daryl McCullough strikes again! Daryl McCullough (10/26/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Uncle assAl-ry number 54322 eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Equivalence my ass! Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Mike (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Uncle assAl-ry number 410052 eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Uncle assAl-ry number 4005 eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Mike (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Bill Hobba (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Hobba? Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev B) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 Edward Green (10/23/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 Edward Green (10/24/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 eleaticus (10/24/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl-ry number 4004 Edward Green (10/24/04)
• A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/21/04)
  • Re: A. Newtonian Invariance vs SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/21/04)
• Frame dragging confirmed. Llanzlan Klazmon (10/21/04)
  • Re: Frame dragging confirmed. Llanzlan Klazmon (10/21/04)
    • Re: Frame dragging confirmed. Uncle Al (10/21/04)
      • Re: Frame dragging confirmed. Jim Greenfield (10/23/04)
• Article: Relativity tested on a shoestring budget Robert Karl Stonjek (10/21/04)
  • Re: Article: Relativity tested on a shoestring budget Uncle Al (10/21/04)
• A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/21/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Uncle Al (10/21/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/23/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Mark Fergerson (10/21/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Y.Porat (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Eckard Blumschein (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME tj Frazir (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Y.Porat (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME RP (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Y.Porat (10/24/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Y.Porat (10/24/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Mark Fergerson (10/25/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Eckard Blumschein (10/22/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/22/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/24/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/25/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/25/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Morituri-Max (10/25/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Y.Porat (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Morituri-Max (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Y.Porat (10/27/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Sam Wormley (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME RP (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME tj Frazir (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/26/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Mike (10/22/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME TomGee (10/22/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME TomGee (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME RP (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME TomGee (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME RP (10/24/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME RP (10/24/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME TomGee (10/24/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/27/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME TomGee (10/25/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Mark Fergerson (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/27/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME TomGee (10/29/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/30/04)
  • re:A New Definition for TIME DAH (10/22/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME David Harper (10/22/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME David Harper (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Morituri-Max (10/23/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/22/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME David Harper (10/22/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME David Harper (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Morituri-Max (10/23/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME The Ghost In The Machine (10/23/04)
    • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/23/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME The Ghost In The Machine (10/25/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Sam Wormley (10/26/04)
      • Re: A New Definition for TIME Ken Seto (10/27/04)
  • Re: A New Definition for TIME ZZBunker (10/24/04)
• Physical constants? DaveP (10/21/04)
  • Re: Physical constants? Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
  • Re: Physical constants? Uncle Al (10/21/04)
    • Re: Physical constants? Jack Martinelli (10/22/04)
      • Re: Physical constants? puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/22/04)
  • Re: Physical constants? psichi (10/21/04)
  • Re: Physical constants? Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/21/04)
  • Re: Physical constants? greywolf42 (10/21/04)
  • Re: Physical constants? josefmatz (10/22/04)
  • Re: Physical constants? ZZBunker (10/22/04)
  • Re: Physical constants? carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (10/23/04)
• Newly found ATOMIC STATE OF SOLIDS Anantham (10/21/04)
• The Matter of "Dark Matter" Dinoiro (10/21/04)
  • Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" Uncle Al (10/21/04)
  • Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
    • Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" robert j. kolker (10/21/04)
      • Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
      • Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" robert j. kolker (10/22/04)
      • Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/21/04)
      • Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" robert j. kolker (10/22/04)
      • Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter" Mitchell (10/22/04)
• Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Archimedes Plutonium (10/21/04)
  • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Archimedes Plutonium (10/21/04)
    • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Sean Houtman (10/22/04)
      • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: ZZBunker (10/22/04)
      • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Sean Houtman (10/23/04)
      • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: ZZBunker (10/23/04)
      • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Sean Houtman (10/24/04)
      • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: ZZBunker (10/24/04)
      • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Archimedes Plutonium (10/23/04)
      • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Sean Houtman (10/24/04)
      • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Archimedes Plutonium (10/24/04)
      • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Archimedes Plutonium (10/25/04)
  • Re: biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Sean Houtman (10/22/04)
• paradox in quantum mechanics jsp (10/21/04)
  • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
    • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics robert j. kolker (10/21/04)
    • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Uncle Al (10/21/04)
    • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
      • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
      • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
  • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
    • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics robert j. kolker (10/21/04)
      • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Alpha Omega (10/21/04)
      • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics René ALBERT (10/22/04)
      • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Alpha Omega (10/22/04)
      • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics René ALBERT (10/22/04)
      • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Alpha Omega (10/22/04)
      • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Eugene Shubert (10/21/04)
    • Re: paradox in quantum mechanics Uncle Al (10/21/04)
• Operation Troll Shoulder 10/21/2004 Morituri-Max (10/21/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 10/21/2004 Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (10/21/04)
• magnetic sensor that can detect biomolecules Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
• Mechanical System Analysis Package Ryan Michela (10/21/04)
  • Re: Mechanical System Analysis Package Timo Nieminen (10/21/04)
    • Re: Mechanical System Analysis Package Joc (10/21/04)
    • Re: Mechanical System Analysis Package Ryan Michela (10/21/04)
      • Re: Mechanical System Analysis Package Ken Muldrew (10/21/04)
      • Re: Mechanical System Analysis Package Ken Muldrew (10/22/04)
      • Re: Mechanical System Analysis Package Timo A. Nieminen (10/22/04)
  • Re: Mechanical System Analysis Package John Bailey (10/22/04)
• doppler effect tsmith (10/21/04)
  • Re: doppler effect Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
    • Re: doppler effect Paul Draper (10/21/04)
      • Re: doppler effect George Jones (10/21/04)
      • Re: doppler effect Paul Draper (10/21/04)
      • Re: doppler effect Mitchell (10/22/04)
      • Re: doppler effect ZZBunker (10/21/04)
      • Re: doppler effect Martin Hogbin (10/21/04)
      • Re: doppler effect Bob Cain (10/22/04)
  • Re: doppler effect Martin Hogbin (10/21/04)
  • Re: doppler effect Old Man (10/21/04)
• Pioneer 10/11 To The Stars Jack Sarfatti (10/21/04)
  • Re: Pioneer 10/11 To The Stars Xeno Bilderberg (10/21/04)
• Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
  • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect RP (10/21/04)
    • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Ken S. Tucker (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect RP (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Mike (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Mike (10/22/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/22/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Bruce Pew (10/21/04)
    • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Dinoiro (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Uncle Al (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect robert j. kolker (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect ad (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Sam Wormley (10/22/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect greywolf42 (10/26/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Jim Greenfield (10/26/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Sam Wormley (10/26/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Myxococcus xanthus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect ad (10/22/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Myxococcus xanthus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect greywolf42 (10/26/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect greywolf42 (10/26/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect greywolf42 (10/26/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Myxococcus xanthus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect greywolf42 (10/26/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Myxococcus xanthus (10/26/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect greywolf42 (10/26/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Myxococcus xanthus (10/27/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect greywolf42 (10/28/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Myxococcus xanthus (10/27/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect greywolf42 (10/28/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Gregory L. Hansen (10/21/04)
      • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Uncle Al (10/21/04)
    • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurementof Lense-Thirring effect Uncle Al (10/21/04)
    • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/21/04)
  • Re: Relativity passes latest test in extremely difficult measurement of Lense-Thirring effect Patrick Powers (10/26/04)
• physics experiments Doodedski (10/21/04)
  • Re: physics experiments Uncle Al (10/21/04)
  • Re: physics experiments Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
    • Re: physics experiments Maleki (10/21/04)
      • Re: physics experiments Steve Ralph (10/21/04)
      • Re: physics experiments Timo Voipio (10/22/04)
  • Re: physics experiments Paul Draper (10/21/04)
  • re:physics experiments Doodedski (10/22/04)
• A history of mechanics Franco (10/21/04)
  • Re: A history of mechanics Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (10/21/04)
• capacitor bank eequalsmarkc2 (10/20/04)
  • Re: capacitor bank Old Man (10/20/04)
    • Re: capacitor bank Ken S. Tucker (10/21/04)
  • Re: capacitor bank Uncle Al (10/21/04)
  • Re: capacitor bank John C. Polasek (10/21/04)
  • Re: capacitor bank HV noprob (10/21/04)
    • Re: capacitor bank Abdu Abdallah Derwis (10/22/04)
  • Re: capacitor bank puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/21/04)
    • Re: capacitor bank Ken S. Tucker (10/21/04)
• THE HAND IS QUICKER THAN THE EYE Sam Wormley (10/20/04)
  • Re: THE HAND IS QUICKER THAN THE EYE G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/26/04)
• Two Sides to the same Coin G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/20/04)
  • Re: Two Sides to the same Coin Sam Wormley (10/20/04)
    • Re: Two Sides to the same Coin G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/22/04)
      • Re: Two Sides to the same Coin Sam Wormley (10/22/04)
      • Re: Two Sides to the same Coin Sam Wormley (10/22/04)
• Bush vs. the Laureates elmer swanson (10/20/04)
  • Re: Bush vs. the Laureates Uncle Al (10/20/04)
  • Re: Bush vs. the Laureates Maleki (10/20/04)
    • Re: Bush vs. the Laureates Mitchell (10/21/04)
  • Re: Bush vs. the Laureates ZZBunker (10/21/04)
  • Re: Bush vs. the Laureates puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/21/04)
• Schwartz, spareness of form with maximum generality Mike Helland (10/20/04)
  • Re: Schwartz, spareness of form with maximum generality Uncle Al (10/20/04)
    • Re: Schwartz, spareness of form with maximum generality Bill (10/22/04)
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 705 October 20, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (10/20/04)
• Relativity and Reasonableness Tests Cisumq (10/20/04)
  • Re: Relativity and Reasonableness Tests Sam Wormley (10/20/04)
  • Re: Relativity and Reasonableness Tests Uncle Al (10/20/04)
• Catholics not wanted at Widener University Go_fly_a_kike (10/20/04)
  • Re: Catholics not wanted at Widener University Maleki (10/20/04)
  • Re: Catholics not wanted at Widener University Bruce Sinclair (10/20/04)
• light lines or stripes heras (10/20/04)
  • Re: light lines or stripes Paul Cardinale (10/20/04)
  • Re: light lines or stripes puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/20/04)
• The hippies... This quantum thing... Mike Henley (10/20/04)
  • Re: The hippies... This quantum thing... Mike Helland (10/20/04)
  • Re: The hippies... This quantum thing... alphapawn (10/20/04)
  • Re: The hippies... This quantum thing... Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/20/04)
  • Re: The hippies... This quantum thing... Bruce Scott TOK (10/20/04)
  • Re: The hippies... This quantum thing... Paul Draper (10/20/04)
    • Re: The hippies... This quantum thing... tj Frazir (10/21/04)
    • Re: The hippies... This quantum thing... tj Frazir (10/21/04)
  • Re: The hippies... This quantum thing... richard miller (10/20/04)
• biology is quantum-dual between plants to animals Re: Compound leaves: Archimedes Plutonium (10/20/04)
• Re: misnomers Eckard Blumschein (10/20/04)
  • Re: misnomers Virgil (10/20/04)
    • Re: misnomers Eckard Blumschein (10/20/04)
      • Re: misnomers Hibernatus (10/20/04)
      • Re: misnomers Eckard Blumschein (10/20/04)
      • Re: misnomers Herman Jurjus (10/21/04)
      • Re: misnomers Eckard Blumschein (10/21/04)
  • Re: misnomers Eckard Blumschein (10/20/04)
• NOW JUST *13* Days & Counting... Nomen Nescio (10/20/04)
  • Re: NOW JUST *13* Days & Counting... jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/20/04)
• Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/20/04)
  • Re: Acceleration Without Time Sam Wormley (10/20/04)
  • Re: Acceleration Without Time ZZBunker (10/20/04)
  • Re: Acceleration Without Time Uncle Al (10/20/04)
    • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/20/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/21/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Paul Draper (10/21/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/21/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Paul Draper (10/22/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/23/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Paul Draper (10/26/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Gregory L. Hansen (10/26/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Ken S. Tucker (10/27/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Paul Draper (10/27/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/27/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Paul Draper (10/28/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Eric Gisse (10/29/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/28/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mel Lep (10/28/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/29/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/27/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Paul Draper (10/27/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Gene Nygaard (10/27/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/28/04)
  • Re: Acceleration Without Time Igor (10/21/04)
  • Re: Acceleration Without Time TomGee (10/21/04)
    • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/22/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time TomGee (10/22/04)
  • Re: Acceleration Without Time tj Frazir (10/22/04)
    • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/22/04)
    • Re: Acceleration Without Time Mitchell (10/25/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time tj Frazir (10/25/04)
      • Re: Acceleration Without Time G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/26/04)
  • Re: Acceleration Without Time robert j. kolker (10/27/04)
• MY RECENT & MOST APPROPRIATE REPLY Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud (10/19/04)
  • Re: MY RECENT & MOST APPROPRIATE REPLY Uncle Al (10/20/04)
  • Re: MY RECENT & MOST APPROPRIATE REPLY john (10/20/04)
• RRRRRRRRRRRRRR is Us Ed Conrad (10/19/04)
  • Re: RRRRRRRRRRRRRR is Us Uncle Al (10/20/04)
    • Re: RRRRRRRRRRRRRR is Us Bunn E. Rabbit (10/21/04)
      • Re: RRRRRRRRRRRRRR is Us Paul Cardinale (10/21/04)
  • Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkko0K is You {Was: RRRRRRRRRRRRRR is Us} Chadwick Stone© (10/20/04)
  • Re: RRRRRRRRRRRRRR is Us Danzig (10/20/04)
  • Re: RRRRRRRRRRRRRR is Us Danzig (10/20/04)
• Creative Music Synth [220] is definitely the fucking best. You'd better fucking admit it or I'll make you sorry. Lover of SB16's FM synth (10/19/04)
• Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Alastair (10/19/04)
  • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/20/04)
    • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Alastair (10/21/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/21/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Alastair (10/22/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/23/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Alastair (10/25/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/26/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Morituri-Max (10/21/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Alastair (10/22/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/22/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? vonroach (10/24/04)
  • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? nightbat (10/20/04)
  • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Sam Wormley (10/21/04)
    • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Alastair (10/22/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Sam Wormley (10/22/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Alastair (10/22/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/23/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Alastair (10/25/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/26/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? George Dishman (10/24/04)
  • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? ZZBunker (10/23/04)
    • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? hanson (10/23/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? ZZBunker (10/23/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/23/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? Sam Wormley (10/24/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? hanson (10/23/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? ZZBunker (10/23/04)
      • Re: Is the Big Bang Still Happening? hanson (10/24/04)
• The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/19/04)
  • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Somebody (10/20/04)
    • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Anthony Cerrato (10/20/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Somebody (10/20/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? ZZBunker (10/21/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Somebody (10/21/04)
    • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/20/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Somebody (10/20/04)
  • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Old Man (10/20/04)
    • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Anthony Cerrato (10/20/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Old Man (10/20/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Mike (10/21/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/20/04)
  • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/20/04)
    • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/20/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/21/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Anthony Cerrato (10/21/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/21/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Anthony Cerrato (10/22/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Old Man (10/23/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Anthony Cerrato (10/23/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Old Man (10/23/04)
      • Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (10/23/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Maleki (10/23/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (10/24/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Maleki (10/24/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Gregory L. Hansen (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Maleki (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? mitch perkins (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? mitch perkins (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (10/26/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? mitch perkins (10/27/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Maleki (10/28/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (10/29/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? mitch perkins (10/31/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Maleki (10/28/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (10/29/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Old Man (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Old Man (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? hanson (10/25/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Old Man (10/26/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Timo Nieminen (10/26/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Maleki (10/26/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? operator jay (10/27/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Old Man (10/27/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Quantum Mirror (10/27/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Maleki (10/27/04)
      • Re: Old Man ....Re: The end ......? Old Man (10/28/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Anthony Cerrato (10/23/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/23/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Anthony Cerrato (10/24/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/24/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Anthony Cerrato (10/24/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/25/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Anthony Cerrato (10/25/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/25/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/25/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/26/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/26/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/25/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/25/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Thomas Trotter (10/25/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/26/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Aleksandr Timofeev (10/21/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/27/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Aleksandr Timofeev (10/28/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/29/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Aleksandr Timofeev (10/27/04)
  • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Simon Hopkins (10/20/04)
    • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Aleksandr Timofeev (10/22/04)
  • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Jim Black (10/20/04)
    • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/21/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Mike (10/21/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/22/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Mike (10/22/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Quantum Mirror (10/23/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? zigoteau (10/25/04)
      • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? Aleksandr Timofeev (10/26/04)
  • Re: The end of Bohr's complementarity principle? ZZBunker (10/24/04)
• Forgeries out of AT&T on Igor Chudov and Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium (10/19/04)
  • Re: Forgeries out of AT&T on Igor Chudov and Archimedes Plutonium Veerappan (10/19/04)
    • Re: Forgeries out of AT&T on Igor Chudov and Archimedes Plutonium Uncle Al (10/19/04)
  • Is this a Microsoft program of (pwned2.tr1n1.net) Re: Forgeries out of AT&T on Igor Chudov and Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium (10/23/04)
    • Re: Is this a Microsoft program of (pwned2.tr1n1.net) Re: Forgeries out of AT&T on Igor Chudov and Archimedes Plutonium Dirk Bruere at Neopax (10/23/04)
    • Re: Is this a Microsoft program of (pwned2.tr1n1.net) Re: Forgeries out of AT&T on Igor Chudov and Archimedes Plutonium N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/23/04)
      • Re: Is this a Microsoft program of (pwned2.tr1n1.net) Re: Forgeries out of AT&T on Igor Chudov and Archimedes Plutonium Maleki (10/23/04)
• GRAVITATION DEFINED GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (10/19/04)
• Hermitian conjugates Natski (10/19/04)
  • Re: Hermitian conjugates Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/19/04)
  • Re: Hermitian conjugates George Jones (10/19/04)
  • Re: Hermitian conjugates Bruce Scott TOK (10/19/04)
• Re: Magnetic Propulsion Experimental Ideas Gregory L. Hansen (10/19/04)
• Re: Is a Crystal-clear Theory Preferable to Dogmatic Riddles? Eugene Shubert (10/19/04)
  • Re: Is a Crystal-clear Theory Preferable to Dogmatic Riddles? Gregory L. Hansen (10/19/04)
    • Re: Is a Crystal-clear Theory Preferable to Dogmatic Riddles? Eugene Shubert (10/19/04)
• magnetic propulsion science tech (10/19/04)
  • Re: magnetic propulsion Paul Victor Birke (10/20/04)
• lightning rod question izzi4 (10/19/04)
  • Re: lightning rod question Bert Hickman (10/19/04)
  • Re: lightning rod question Uncle Al (10/19/04)
    • Re: lightning rod question izzi4 (10/19/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Don Kelly (10/19/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Rich Grise (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Vermin (10/20/04)
  • Re: lightning rod question Sam Wormley (10/19/04)
  • Re: lightning rod question rayjking (10/20/04)
    • Re: lightning rod question Gordon Youd (10/20/04)
    • Re: lightning rod question izzi4 (10/20/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question rayjking (10/20/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Bert Hickman (10/20/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question windsound damper tj Frazir (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Rich Grise (10/21/04)
    • Re: lightning rod question Tom Biasi (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Don Kelly (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Tom Biasi (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question w_tom (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Rich Grise (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Tom MacIntyre (10/22/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Bob Masta (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question rayjking (10/21/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question tj Frazir (10/22/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Edward Green (10/24/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question tj Frazir (10/25/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Rich Grise (10/22/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Roger Johansson (10/22/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Bob Myers (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Roger Johansson (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Rich Grise (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Roger Johansson (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Bob Myers (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Tom Biasi (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Rich Grise (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Sam Wormley (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Richard Henry (10/24/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question William J. Beaty (10/22/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Don Kelly (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question William J. Beaty (10/22/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Tom Biasi (10/22/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Rich Grise (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Myxococcus xanthus (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question John Popelish (10/23/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Don Kelly (10/24/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question TimR (10/24/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Edward Green (10/24/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/24/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Rich Grise (10/24/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Roger Johansson (10/24/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question TimR (10/25/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Roger Johansson (10/25/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Clarence (10/25/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Don Kelly (10/26/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question tj Frazir (10/26/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Jamie (10/25/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/25/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question William J. Beaty (10/26/04)
      • Re: lightning rod question Don Kelly (10/26/04)
• Re: Age of the Gunflint Formation ? Hannu K.J. Poropudas (10/19/04)
• Spintronics - GMR Jens Riedel (10/19/04)
• Examining Mathematical Approaches Gnivilq (10/19/04)
  • Re: Examining Mathematical Approaches Sam Wormley (10/19/04)
  • Re: Examining Mathematical Approaches Uncle Al (10/19/04)
• Books on Mathematical Methods Tomas Selnekovic (10/19/04)
  • Re: Books on Mathematical Methods George Jones (10/19/04)
  • Re: Books on Mathematical Methods puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/19/04)
    • Re: Books on Mathematical Methods Maleki (10/19/04)
      • Re: Books on Mathematical Methods Bruce Scott TOK (10/20/04)
  • Re: Books on Mathematical Methods Flower Cat (10/19/04)
  • Re: Books on Mathematical Methods psichi (10/20/04)
• a gun and block problem Spockie (10/19/04)
  • Re: a gun and block problem Rene Tschaggelar (10/19/04)
    • Re: a gun and block problem Ian Stirling (10/19/04)
    • Re: a gun and block problem Paul Draper (10/19/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem Rene Tschaggelar (10/19/04)
  • Re: a gun and block problem Andy Resnick (10/19/04)
    • Re: a gun and block problem Paul Draper (10/19/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem briggs_at_encompasserve.org (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem tj Frazir (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem Paul Draper (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem Andy Resnick (10/21/04)
  • Re: a gun and block problem Randy Poe (10/19/04)
    • Re: a gun and block problem Spockie (10/19/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem Jim Black (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem Randy Poe (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem Randy Poe (10/20/04)
  • Re: a gun and block problem Gregory L. Hansen (10/19/04)
    • Re: a gun and block problem Andy Resnick (10/19/04)
    • Re: a gun and block problem markzoom (10/20/04)
  • Re: a gun and block problem Paul Draper (10/19/04)
    • Re: a gun and block problem Gregory L. Hansen (10/19/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem tj Frazir (10/20/04)
  • Re: a gun and block problem tj Frazir (10/20/04)
    • Re: a gun and block problem Gregory L. Hansen (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block problem markzoom (10/20/04)
  • Re: a gun and block problem tj Frazir (10/20/04)
  • Re: a gun and block problem 8 cm conservation tj Frazir (10/20/04)
    • Re: a gun and block BUSTED tj Frazir (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED Gregory L. Hansen (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED Rene Tschaggelar (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED markzoom (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED Gregory L. Hansen (10/21/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED markzoom (10/21/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED Ken Muldrew (10/21/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED Harry Conover (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED tj Frazir (10/20/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED tj Frazir (10/21/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED tj Frazir (10/21/04)
      • Re: a gun and block bossacona tj Frazir (10/21/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED Harry Conover (10/21/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED Randy Poe (10/21/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED Rene Tschaggelar (10/21/04)
      • Re: a gun and block BUSTED tj Frazir (10/22/04)
  • Re: a gun and block problem markzoom (10/20/04)
    • Re: a gun and block problem tj Frazir (10/21/04)
• need help on kinetic energy Kamran (10/19/04)
  • Re: need help on kinetic energy Dave Baker (10/19/04)
    • Re: need help on kinetic energy Kamran (10/19/04)
      • Re: need help on kinetic energy Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/19/04)
      • Re: need help on kinetic energy George Jones (10/19/04)
      • Re: need help on kinetic energy Kamran (10/19/04)
  • Re: need help on kinetic energy Mike (10/19/04)
  • Re: need help on kinetic energy Paul Draper (10/19/04)
  • Re: need help on kinetic energy puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/19/04)
  • Re: need help on kinetic energy Kamran (10/20/04)
• Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Jason W. Hinson (10/19/04)
• Re: A CLIMATE-DESTABILIZATION COMPENDIUM Machete (10/19/04)
• Need help on a ques. Gagan (10/19/04)
  • Re: Need help on a ques. Peter (10/19/04)
  • Re: Need help on a ques. Timo Nieminen (10/19/04)
    • Re: Need help on a ques. Gagan (10/19/04)
  • Re: Need help on a ques. puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/19/04)
  • Re: Need help on a ques. Old Man (10/19/04)
• Science is Stoned If I told U I'd have 2 kill U (10/19/04)
  • Re: Science is Stoned Dan Bloomquist (10/19/04)
    • Re: Science is Stoned Roland PJ (10/20/04)
  • Re: Science is Stoned EskWIRED_at_spamblock.panix.com (10/19/04)
    • Re: Science is Stoned Gregory L. Hansen (10/19/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned hanson (10/19/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned Don Priebe (10/19/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned hanson (10/19/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned Don Kelly (10/20/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned Dan (10/21/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned charliew2 (10/26/04)
  • Re: Science is Stoned Willcox (10/19/04)
    • Re: Science is Stoned Jo Stein (10/20/04)
  • Re: Science is Stoned Harry Conover (10/19/04)
    • Re: Science is Stoned Roland PJ (10/20/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned saict (10/20/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned Harry Conover (10/20/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned Dan (10/21/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned John Chatelle (10/21/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned ZZBunker (10/21/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned Bill Ward (10/21/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned ZZBunker (10/21/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned Bill Ward (10/21/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned ZZBunker (10/21/04)
      • Re: Science is Stoned Bill Ward (10/20/04)
  • Re: Science is Stoned David Canzi -- non-mailable address (10/19/04)
  • Re: Science is Stoned Garry (10/19/04)
• JUST *14 Days* & Counting . . . Nomen Nescio (10/19/04)
• New Hydrogen Physics (?) Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/19/04)
  • Re: New Hydrogen Physics (?) sanman (10/29/04)
    • Re: New Hydrogen Physics (?) Franz Heymann (10/29/04)
      • Re: New Hydrogen Physics (?) Don Lancaster (10/29/04)
      • Re: New Hydrogen Physics (?) Bob Eldred (10/30/04)
      • Re: New Hydrogen Physics (?) sanman (10/30/04)
      • Re: New Hydrogen Physics (?) Franz Heymann (10/30/04)
      • Re: New Hydrogen Physics (?) Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/30/04)
      • Re: New Hydrogen Physics (?) Franz Heymann (10/30/04)
      • Re: New Hydrogen Physics (?) Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/30/04)
• Robert Park and Nick Cook on VRIL AKA ZPF Jack Sarfatti (10/19/04)
  • Re: D E L U SI O N A L E P I L E P T I C S U P D A T E ! Koyaanisqatsi Fahrvergnugen (10/19/04)
    • DARK ENERGY - The Mystery _ (Was: Re: D E L U S I O N A L E P I L E P T I C S U P D A T E !) Pontifex Maximus (10/20/04)
      • Re: DARK ENERGY - The Mystery _ (Was: Re: D E L U S I O N A L E P I L E P T I C S U P D A T E !) Morituri-Max (10/20/04)
    • Re: D E L U SI O N A L E P I L E P T I C S U P D A T E ! John Vreeland (10/28/04)
• It is a Force That Drives Inflation Mitchell (10/19/04)
  • Re: It is a Force That Drives Inflation Uncle Al (10/19/04)
• Strength of Earth's Magnetic Field in LEO? Paul Ciszek (10/19/04)
  • Re: Strength of Earth's Magnetic Field in LEO? Timo Nieminen (10/19/04)
    • Re: Strength of Earth's Magnetic Field in LEO? Paul Ciszek (10/19/04)
      • Re: Strength of Earth's Magnetic Field in LEO? Tim May (10/19/04)
• Re: Eotvos: Une questionne pour le Oncle du Al Maleki (10/19/04)
• Infinity looking finite? Boyan (10/18/04)
  • Re: Infinity looking finite? Anthony Cerrato (10/19/04)
• Gravity as Falling Space Henry Haapalainen (10/18/04)
  • Re: Gravity as Falling Space Uncle Al (10/18/04)
• Question for experts Smart (10/18/04)
  • Re: Question for experts Uncle Al (10/18/04)
  • Re: Question for experts Old Man (10/19/04)
• The Separation From GR and QM G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/18/04)
  • Re: The Separation From GR and QM Sam Wormley (10/18/04)
• The Separation Of Time And Space TomGee (10/18/04)
  • Re: The Separation Of Time And Space John T Lowry (10/18/04)
    • Re: The Separation Of Time And Space TomGee (10/19/04)
  • Re: The Separation Of Time And Space Uncle Al (10/18/04)
    • Re: The Separation Of Time And Space TomGee (10/19/04)
  • Re: The Separation Of Time And Space brodix (10/19/04)
• Radiation above gamma ray? Pascal Damian (10/18/04)
  • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? John T Lowry (10/18/04)
    • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? The Ghost In The Machine (10/19/04)
      • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/19/04)
      • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? Pascal Damian (10/19/04)
      • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? The Ghost In The Machine (10/21/04)
  • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? Uncle Al (10/18/04)
    • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? Pascal Damian (10/19/04)
  • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? Paul Ciszek (10/19/04)
    • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? Pascal Damian (10/19/04)
      • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? Paul Ciszek (10/19/04)
      • Re: Radiation above gamma ray? Gregory L. Hansen (10/19/04)
• The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light Postinglog (10/18/04)
  • Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light Uncle Al (10/18/04)
• The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light Postinglog (10/18/04)
  • Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light Sam Wormley (10/18/04)
  • Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light Uncle Al (10/18/04)
• tv detector vans Tim Mellor (10/18/04)
  • Re: tv detector vans Ian Stirling (10/18/04)
  • Re: tv detector vans Uncle Al (10/18/04)
    • Re: tv detector vans Jim (10/19/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/19/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans Richard Herring (10/19/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans Martin Hogbin (10/19/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans Richard Herring (10/20/04)
  • Re: tv detector vans tj Frazir (10/18/04)
    • Re: tv detector vans Tim Mellor (10/19/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans tj Frazir (10/20/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans Tim Mellor (10/20/04)
  • Re: tv detector vans Quacker (10/18/04)
    • Re: tv detector vans Ian Stirling (10/18/04)
    • Re: tv detector vans AC (10/19/04)
  • Re: tv detector vans The Ghost In The Machine (10/19/04)
  • Re: tv detector vans Richard Herring (10/19/04)
  • Re: tv detector vans Tim Mellor (10/19/04)
    • Re: tv detector vans Ian Stirling (10/19/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/19/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans Ian Stirling (10/19/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/19/04)
      • Re: tv detector vans tj Frazir (10/20/04)
  • Re: tv detector vans Mike (10/19/04)
• Re: Nobel Peace Prize and AIDS fallacy Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/18/04)
• Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? cyberdude (10/18/04)
  • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? John T Lowry (10/18/04)
    • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/18/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Edward Green (10/18/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/19/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Edward Green (10/23/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Edward Green (10/23/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Gregory L. Hansen (10/24/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Edward Green (10/28/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Gregory L. Hansen (10/28/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Edward Green (10/29/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Gregory L. Hansen (10/29/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? robert j. kolker (10/29/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Edward Green (10/29/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun bullshit tj Frazir (10/19/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun THE REAL TEST tj Frazir (10/19/04)
  • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Uncle Al (10/18/04)
    • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Boris Mohar (10/18/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Uncle Al (10/19/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Sam Wormley (10/19/04)
  • re:Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? DAH (10/18/04)
    • Re: re:Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? tj Frazir (10/18/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Edward Green (10/18/04)
  • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Igor (10/18/04)
  • re:Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? DAH (10/18/04)
    • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Sam Wormley (10/18/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? jocclev_at_swbell.net (10/19/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? tj Frazir (10/19/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? OG (10/19/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? tj Frazir (10/19/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? OG (10/20/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? tj Frazir (10/21/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Quantum Mirror (10/22/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Gregory L. Hansen (10/22/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun boiled egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? Jim Greenfield (10/19/04)
  • Re: Why does a spun BUSTED egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? tj Frazir (10/19/04)
    • Re: Why does a spun BUSTED egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? OG (10/19/04)
      • Re: Why does a spun BUSTED egg spin longer than a spun raw egg? tj Frazir (10/21/04)
• artificial rain _at_(none) (10/18/04)
  • Re: artificial rain Morituri-Max (10/18/04)
    • Re: artificial rain _at_(none) (10/18/04)
      • Re: artificial rain Uncle Al (10/18/04)
  • Re: artificial rain Uncle Al (10/18/04)
    • Re: artificial rain robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
    • Re: artificial rain tj Frazir (10/18/04)
      • Re: artificial rain Ian Stirling (10/18/04)
      • Re: artificial rain Gregory L. Hansen (10/18/04)
      • Re: artificial rain tj Frazir (10/18/04)
      • Re: artificial rain The Ghost In The Machine (10/19/04)
    • Re: artificial rain _at_(none) (10/19/04)
      • Re: artificial rain tj Frazir (10/19/04)
    • Re: artificial rain Will Janoschka (10/24/04)
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 18, 2004 PhDs.org Webmaster (10/18/04)
• B SR-cult fraud and corruption (rev a) eleaticus (10/18/04)
• The nutty physics professor MrPepper11 (10/18/04)
  • Re: The nutty physics professor Uncle Al (10/18/04)
  • Re: The nutty physics professor will e (10/18/04)
    • Re: The nutty physics professor richard miller (10/18/04)
    • Re: The nutty physics professor puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/20/04)
  • Re: The nutty physics professor Maleki (10/19/04)
    • Re: The nutty physics professor Bruce Scott TOK (10/20/04)
• Need information on room temperature sensor. Kelvin (10/18/04)
  • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. s6sej73w9 (10/18/04)
  • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/18/04)
  • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. Endymion Ponsonby-Withermoor III (10/18/04)
    • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. Norm Dresner (10/18/04)
    • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. Norm Dresner (10/18/04)
    • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. tadchem (10/18/04)
    • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. CBFalconer (10/18/04)
    • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. Martin Pot (10/19/04)
  • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. Henry Kiefer (10/18/04)
  • re:Need information on room temperature sensor. DAH (10/18/04)
  • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. richard miller (10/18/04)
  • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. Spehro Pefhany (10/18/04)
  • re:Need information on room temperature sensor. DAH (10/18/04)
  • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. Paul E. Bennett (10/18/04)
  • Re: Need information on room temperature sensor. Paul E. Bennett (10/18/04)
• MULTIPLE CHOICE BKJ (10/18/04)
  • Re: MULTIPLE CHOICE John Popelish (10/18/04)
  • Re: MULTIPLE CHOICE Uncle Al (10/18/04)
• Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Garry (10/18/04)
  • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Sam Wormley (10/18/04)
    • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Garry (10/18/04)
      • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Sam Wormley (10/18/04)
      • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Garry (10/18/04)
      • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? tj Frazir (10/19/04)
  • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
  • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Uncle Al (10/18/04)
  • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Bert Hickman (10/18/04)
    • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Garry (10/19/04)
  • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Mark Fergerson (10/19/04)
    • Re: Static Electricity Throwing Someone Across the Room? Garry (10/19/04)
• Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/18/04)
  • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Creighton Hogg (10/18/04)
    • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/18/04)
  • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
    • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/18/04)
  • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/18/04)
    • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/18/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/19/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/20/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/20/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/20/04)
  • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Timothy Golden (10/19/04)
    • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/19/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Timothy Golden (10/21/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/22/04)
  • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Timothy Golden (10/24/04)
    • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/24/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Timothy Golden (10/26/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/26/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Timothy Golden (10/27/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/27/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Timothy Golden (10/28/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/28/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Timothy Golden (10/29/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Ken S. Tucker (10/30/04)
      • Re: Introduction to Unitivity. (kst) Timothy Golden (10/30/04)
• A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/17/04)
  • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Rick (10/18/04)
    • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Rick (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Rick (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Liam Slider (10/18/04)
  • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? ray (10/18/04)
    • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? ray (10/18/04)
    • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Linønut (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Rick (10/18/04)
  • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? QQ=AB?= (10/18/04)
  • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? tj Frazir (10/18/04)
  • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/18/04)
    • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/18/04)
  • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? !SpamMe (10/18/04)
    • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/18/04)
      • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/18/04)
  • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? mlw (10/18/04)
    • Re: A PostScript printer at home ? Jeff Relf (10/18/04)
• The World According to Jason 7 Habits Of Highly Effective Penii (10/17/04)
• Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? Ross A. Finlayson (10/17/04)
  • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? J.E. (10/18/04)
    • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? Ross A. Finlayson (10/29/04)
      • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? J.E. (10/29/04)
  • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? Ross A. Finlayson (10/26/04)
    • Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is? J.E. (10/27/04)
• Deconstructing Jacky Jack Sarfatti (10/17/04)
  • Re: Deconstructing Jacky Monkey FourSevenZeroOne (10/18/04)
• Fermat ben ito (10/17/04)
  • Re: Fermat Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/18/04)
• New data on Pioneer 10/11 NASA Space Probe Jack Sarfatti (10/17/04)
• The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/17/04)
  • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/19/04)
    • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... John Sefton (10/20/04)
      • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/20/04)
    • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Ken S. Tucker (10/20/04)
      • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
      • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/25/04)
      • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
      • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/27/04)
      • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Ken S. Tucker (10/27/04)
  • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Mike (10/20/04)
    • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/20/04)
      • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Bilge (10/21/04)
  • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (10/21/04)
    • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... Paul Stowe (10/23/04)
    • Re: The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... greywolf42 (10/24/04)
• New Data on NASA Pioneer 10/11 Dark Energy Anomaly Jack Sarfatti (10/17/04)
  • Re: New Data on NASA Pioneer 10/11 Dark Energy Anomaly Jonathan Silverlight (10/18/04)
• Phantom Entanglement Old Man (10/17/04)
  • Re: Phantom Entanglement Greysky (10/17/04)
    • Re: Phantom Entanglement richard miller (10/18/04)
  • re:Phantom Entanglement DAH (10/18/04)
• Deconstructing Jacky Jack Sarfatti (10/17/04)
• The Brilliance of Our Teachers Noogalq (10/17/04)
  • Re: The Brilliance of Our Teachers Sam Wormley (10/17/04)
  • Re: The Brilliance of Our Teachers Uncle Al (10/17/04)
• Re: The sound of a laser. Ian (10/17/04)
  • Re: The sound of a laser. Sam Goldwasser (10/17/04)
• A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
  • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Dirk Van de moortel (10/17/04)
    • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
    • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) AllYou! (10/18/04)
  • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Eric Gisse (10/17/04)
  • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/17/04)
    • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/17/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
    • Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) RP (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) RP (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl agrees: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
  • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bill Hobba (10/17/04)
  • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Paul B. Andersen (10/18/04)
    • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Eric Gisse (10/19/04)
      • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Paul B. Andersen (10/18/04)
    • Well, Paul? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Paul? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • See, Unca assAl? Re: Well, Paul? Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
  • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) Bilge (10/18/04)
  • Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption (Rev A) eleaticus (10/23/04)
• laplace equation uniqueness theorem and spherically symmetric mass distributions Qb0rt (10/17/04)
  • Re: laplace equation uniqueness theorem and spherically symmetric mass distributions Qb0rt (10/17/04)
• Question About Rotational Transformation Matrix Professor Gauss (10/17/04)
  • Re: Question About Rotational Transformation Matrix zigoteau (10/17/04)
    • Re: Question About Rotational Transformation Matrix Professor Gauss (10/19/04)
      • Re: Question About Rotational Transformation Matrix zigoteau (10/20/04)
      • Re: Question About Rotational Transformation Matrix zigoteau (10/23/04)
• Conversion of Ratio of specific heats to metric David Findlay (10/17/04)
  • Re: Conversion of Ratio of specific heats to metric John T Lowry (10/17/04)
    • Re: Conversion of Ratio of specific heats to metric David Findlay (10/18/04)
• Possible Cure For AIDS S. Enterprize Company (10/17/04)
  • Re: Possible Cure For AIDS jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/17/04)
• Space-time Began as a Point Mitchell (10/17/04)
  • Re: Space-time Began as a Point Anun (10/17/04)
    • Re: Space-time Began as a Point Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: Space-time Began as a Point Noogalq (10/17/04)
      • Re: Space-time Began as a Point Mitchell (10/17/04)
    • Re: Space-time Began as a Point Mitchell (10/17/04)
  • Re: Space-time Began as a Point Uncle Al (10/17/04)
    • Re: Space-time Began as a Point Mitchell (10/18/04)
      • Re: Space-time Began as a Point Mitchell (10/28/04)
  • Re: Space-time Began as a Point Mitchell (10/24/04)
• More on NASA Space-Probe Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly Data Jack Sarfatti (10/17/04)
  • Re: More on NASA Space-Probe Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly Data John Sefton (10/17/04)
  • Re: COSMIC DAY SIX - BEAM UP ! Monkey FourSevenZeroOne (10/17/04)
    • Re: COSMIC DAY SIX - BEAM UP ! Demo Hassan (10/17/04)
• Physics Student Needs Help kimberly (10/17/04)
  • Re: Physics Student Needs Help Gregory L. Hansen (10/17/04)
  • Re: Physics Student Needs Help Old Man (10/17/04)
  • Re: Physics Student Needs Help Mike (10/17/04)
    • Re: Physics Student Needs Help kimberly (10/17/04)
    • Re: Physics Student Needs Help kimberly (10/17/04)
• Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 Morituri-Max (10/16/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 Jim Black (10/17/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 Jim Black (10/17/04)
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 Eric Gisse (10/18/04)
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (10/18/04)
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 tj Frazir (10/18/04)
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 Jim Black (10/18/04)
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (10/19/04)
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 Morituri-Max (10/19/04)
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Weekend Update 10/16/2004 Jim Black (10/19/04)
• Re: Expert Says E.T.s Cause International Conflicts Morituri-Max (10/16/04)
  • Re: Expert Says E.T.s Cause International Conflicts Ken S. Tucker (10/16/04)
  • Re: Expert Says E.T.s Cause International Conflicts Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/17/04)
• Carlos Castro's Cosmological Model of Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly Jack Sarfatti (10/16/04)
  • Re: Carlos Castro's Cosmological Model of Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly Porky Pig Jr (10/16/04)
    • Re: Carlos Castro's Cosmological Model of Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly TMG (10/17/04)
• How stars and galaxies form - Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly's Message Jack Sarfatti (10/16/04)
• Relativity and Reasonableness Tests Skckpwq (10/16/04)
  • Re: Relativity and Reasonableness Tests Uncle Al (10/16/04)
• jumping from a bridge Rolphe Fehlmann (10/16/04)
  • Re: jumping from a bridge John T Lowry (10/16/04)
  • Re: jumping from a bridge Dirk Van de moortel (10/16/04)
  • Re: jumping from a bridge Morituri-Max (10/16/04)
  • Re: jumping from a bridge The Ghost In The Machine (10/17/04)
    • Re: jumping from a bridge John T Lowry (10/17/04)
      • Re: jumping from a bridge The Ghost In The Machine (10/17/04)
      • Re: jumping from a bridge Andy Resnick (10/18/04)
    • Re: jumping from a bridge Nicolas Dickreuter (10/17/04)
      • Re: jumping from a bridge TimR (10/18/04)
      • Re: jumping from a bridge Nicolas Dickreuter (10/19/04)
      • Re: jumping from a bridge tj Frazir (10/20/04)
      • Re: jumping from a bridge Nicolas Dickreuter (10/20/04)
      • Re: jumping from a bridge Eric Gisse (10/21/04)
      • Re: jumping from a bridge tj Frazir (10/21/04)
  • Re: jumping from a bridge Edward Green (10/28/04)
• Are all QM interactions measurements? Simon Hopkins (10/16/04)
  • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? John T Lowry (10/16/04)
  • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Old Man (10/16/04)
  • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Edward Green (10/17/04)
    • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Anthony Cerrato (10/17/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Old Man (10/19/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Anthony Cerrato (10/19/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Old Man (10/19/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Simon Hopkins (10/19/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Old Man (10/19/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Simon Hopkins (10/19/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Anthony Cerrato (10/20/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? zigoteau (10/24/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Bob Cain (10/24/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? zigoteau (10/25/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Bob Cain (10/27/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? zigoteau (10/27/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Anthony Cerrato (10/20/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Old Man (10/20/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Edward Green (10/23/04)
      • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Edward Green (10/23/04)
  • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Jim Black (10/17/04)
  • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Mitchell (10/18/04)
    • Re: Are all QM interactions measurements? Sam Wormley (10/18/04)
• Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (10/16/04)
  • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Uncle Al (10/16/04)
    • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Androcles (10/17/04)
      • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities The Ghost In The Machine (10/17/04)
• (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (10/16/04)
  • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/16/04)
    • Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/16/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Jim Black (10/17/04)
      • Well, Kolker? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Kolker? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Kolker? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals J.E. (10/26/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Androcles (10/26/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Igor (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (10/17/04)
      • Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Mitchell (10/18/04)
      • Well, Mori-Max Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Mori-Max Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Mori-Max Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (10/24/04)
      • Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals David Evens (10/25/04)
      • Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/25/04)
      • Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals David Evens (10/26/04)
      • Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/26/04)
      • Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eric Gisse (10/26/04)
      • Re: Well, Gisse? Re: Uncle assAl: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals eleaticus (10/26/04)
• Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (10/16/04)
  • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/16/04)
    • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws The Ghost In The Machine (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/17/04)
      • Well, McAnal? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, McAnal? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, McAnal? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Well, Uncle assAl? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Uncle assAl? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/22/04)
      • Re: Well, Uncle assAl? Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/23/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Gregory L. Hansen (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Gregory L. Hansen (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Gregory L. Hansen (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/17/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/20/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/20/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws David McAnally (10/27/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/27/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Dirk Van de moortel (10/28/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/18/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws The Ghost In The Machine (10/19/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws eleaticus (10/20/04)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (10/20/04)
• Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (10/16/04)
  • Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Uncle Al (10/16/04)
• Conventional Fusion FAQ Section 0/11 (Intro) Part 1/3 (Overview) Robert F. Heeter (10/16/04)
• Superstructures add to superconducting mystery Sam Wormley (10/16/04)
• Large groups of power-generating windmills could.... Sam Wormley (10/16/04)
  • Re: Large groups of power-generating windmills could.... John Sefton (10/17/04)
  • Re: Large groups of power-generating windmills could.... jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/17/04)
  • Re: Large groups of power-generating windmills could.... Old Man (10/17/04)
• Educating via analyses... in movies and TV Sam Wormley (10/16/04)
• What's New -- Friday, October 15, 2004 -- by Bob Park Sam Wormley (10/16/04)
  • Re: What's New -- Friday, October 15, 2004 -- by Bob Park John Sefton (10/16/04)
• The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance Sam Wormley (10/16/04)
  • Re: The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
    • Re: The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance ZZBunker (10/16/04)
• Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/16/04)
  • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Hatunen (10/16/04)
    • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Say not the Struggle nought Availeth (10/18/04)
  • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Bob Eldred (10/16/04)
  • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need ZZBunker (10/18/04)
  • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Dan Bloomquist (10/18/04)
    • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Hatunen (10/18/04)
      • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Dan Bloomquist (10/18/04)
      • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Hatunen (10/18/04)
      • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Dan Bloomquist (10/19/04)
      • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Don Kelly (10/19/04)
      • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Dan Bloomquist (10/19/04)
      • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Don Kelly (10/19/04)
      • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Hatunen (10/19/04)
      • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Tim O'Flaherty (10/19/04)
      • Re: Gaps in the grid - How to build the energy system that we need Dan Bloomquist (10/19/04)
• Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL Dr. Jai Maharaj (10/16/04)
  • Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL tj Frazir (10/16/04)
  • Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL Tom Simonds (10/17/04)
    • Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL Mike Swift (10/17/04)
    • Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/18/04)
      • Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL Dan Bloomquist (10/18/04)
      • Re: AN ENERGY WINDFALL mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/18/04)
• Re: The Crusade Against Evolution hanson (10/16/04)
• Re: Wind energy Bob Eldred (10/15/04)
  • Re: Wind energy jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/16/04)
    • Re: Wind energy Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/16/04)
      • Re: Wind energy jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/16/04)
      • Re: Wind energy Sigvaldi Eggertsson (10/17/04)
      • Re: Wind energy jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/17/04)
      • Boycott Icelandic Fish Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/17/04)
      • Re: Boycott Icelandic Fish Eunometic (10/18/04)
      • Re: Boycott Icelandic Fish tj Frazir (10/18/04)
  • Re: Wind energy habshi (10/16/04)
    • Re: Wind energy ZZBunker (10/16/04)
      • Re: Wind energy The Ghost In The Machine (10/17/04)
      • Re: Wind energy ZZBunker (10/17/04)
  • Re: Wind energy Alex Terrell (10/16/04)
    • Re: Wind energy ZZBunker (10/17/04)
    • Re: Wind energy The Ghost In The Machine (10/17/04)
      • Re: Wind energy Alex Terrell (10/18/04)
    • Re: Wind energy Michelle Vadeboncoeur (10/17/04)
  • Re: Wind energy puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/18/04)
• Weighty argument in favour of an aether frame joseph levy (10/15/04)
  • Re: Weighty argument in favour of an aether frame Uncle Al (10/15/04)
    • Re: Weighty argument in favour of an aether frame John Sefton (10/16/04)
      • Re: Weighty argument in favour of an aether frame Sam Wormley (10/16/04)
  • Re: Weighty argument in favour of an aether frame Dirk Van de moortel (10/15/04)
  • Re: Weighty argument in favour of an aether frame Harry Conover (10/16/04)
  • Re: Weighty argument in favour of an aether frame The Ghost In The Machine (10/17/04)
• Some things I'm confused on in math Joe (10/15/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Joona I Palaste (10/15/04)
    • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Joona I Palaste (10/15/04)
      • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Anthony Cerrato (10/16/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Arturo Magidin (10/15/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Wayne Brown (10/15/04)
    • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Barb Knox (10/15/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Robert Low (10/15/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Sam Wormley (10/15/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math pete (10/16/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math William Elliot (10/16/04)
    • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Mike Oliver (10/16/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Dave Baker (10/16/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Joe (10/17/04)
    • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Arturo Magidin (10/17/04)
      • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Mike Oliver (10/17/04)
    • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Daniel W. Johnson (10/17/04)
    • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Richard Henry (10/17/04)
      • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Barb Knox (10/17/04)
    • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math mike3 (10/18/04)
      • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Barb Knox (10/18/04)
      • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Richard Henry (10/19/04)
      • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Barb Knox (10/19/04)
      • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Daniel W. Johnson (10/19/04)
      • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Sam Wormley (10/19/04)
    • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math will e (10/18/04)
    • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (10/19/04)
  • Re: Some things I'm confused on in math Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (10/17/04)
• Cabinet X-Ray System Hendrick (10/15/04)
  • Re: Cabinet X-Ray System Nispan (10/16/04)
  • Re: Cabinet X-Ray System Mark Fergerson (10/16/04)
• johnreed take V.I johnlawrencereed (10/15/04)
• Explanation of NASA Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly Jack Sarfatti (10/15/04)
  • Re: Explanation of NASA Pioneer 10/11 Anomaly John Sefton (10/15/04)
• The Right Angle Lever Paradox Taertwq (10/15/04)
  • Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox Uncle Al (10/15/04)
• The Right Angle Lever Paradox Taertwq (10/15/04)
  • Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox Uncle Al (10/15/04)
• Biot-Savart's Companion (10/15/04) David Rutherford (10/15/04)
• hopelessly looking for superselection rules-variables seratend (10/15/04)
• test Babak Majidzadeh (10/15/04)
• Siege artillery (was:Re: OT: Historical Amnesia DrPostman (10/15/04)
  • Re: Siege artillery (was:Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Repeating Rifle (10/15/04)
    • Re: Siege artillery (was:Re: OT: Historical Amnesia DrPostman (10/16/04)
      • Re: Siege artillery (was:Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Larry Huntley (10/16/04)
      • Re: Siege artillery (was:Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Repeating Rifle (10/17/04)
      • Re: Siege artillery (was:Re: OT: Historical Amnesia DrPostman (10/18/04)
• WORST CASE SCENARIO charles vind (10/15/04)
  • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO John Baker (10/15/04)
    • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Raj Rijhwani (10/19/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Ian St. John (10/19/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Alexander Mulligan (10/20/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Ian St. John (10/20/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO ????? (10/20/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Ian St. John (10/20/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Alexander Mulligan (10/20/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Ian St. John (10/20/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Alexander Mulligan (10/21/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Ian St. John (10/21/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO nazimshah (10/21/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO John Baker (10/22/04)
  • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO EjP (10/15/04)
    • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges (10/15/04)
  • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Az_ (10/15/04)
  • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Roger Coppock (10/15/04)
    • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Kevin Cannon (10/15/04)
  • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Uncle Al (10/15/04)
  • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Kevin Cannon (10/15/04)
    • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO O. Pointy Byrd (10/15/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Free Speech (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Free Speech (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Michael Davis (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Dan Bloomquist (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Michael Davis (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Dan Bloomquist (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Dan Bloomquist (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Michael Davis (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/16/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Michael Davis (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/17/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/18/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/18/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/18/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/19/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/20/04)
      • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/20/04)
  • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO raven1 (10/15/04)
  • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Tim K. (10/18/04)
    • Re: WORST CASE SCENARIO Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/18/04)
• Physical examples of rank 3 tensors? Martha Goys (10/15/04)
  • Re: Physical examples of rank 3 tensors? chris h fleming (10/15/04)
    • Re: Physical examples of rank 3 tensors? Martha Goys (10/16/04)
  • Re: Physical examples of rank 3 tensors? Bruce Scott TOK (10/15/04)
  • Re: Physical examples of rank 3 tensors? John C. Polasek (10/15/04)
  • Re: Physical examples of rank 3 tensors? zigoteau (10/17/04)
• A discovery. John Schoenfeld (10/15/04)
  • Re: A discovery. John Sefton (10/15/04)
    • Re: A discovery. John Schoenfeld (10/15/04)
      • Re: A discovery. QNils_O=2E_Sel=E5sdal=22?= (10/15/04)
      • Re: A discovery. David C. Ullrich (10/16/04)
      • Re: A discovery. David Bandel (10/17/04)
      • Re: A discovery. John Schoenfeld (10/20/04)
      • Re: A discovery. David Bandel (10/21/04)
      • Re: A discovery. John Schoenfeld (10/22/04)
      • Re: A discovery. Joe (10/16/04)
      • Re: A discovery. Hibernatus (10/16/04)
      • Re: A discovery. Joe (10/17/04)
  • Re: A discovery. Tim Mellor (10/15/04)
  • Re: A discovery. Luis A. Rodriguez (10/15/04)
  • Re: A discovery. Uncle Al (10/15/04)
    • Re: A discovery. John Schoenfeld (10/16/04)
  • Re: A discovery. Mike (10/15/04)
• Earthquake shakes up gravity Sam Wormley (10/15/04)
  • Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity Morituri-Max (10/15/04)
    • Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity Mike (10/15/04)
      • Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity Mark Martin (10/15/04)
      • Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity David Harper (10/15/04)
      • Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity Mike (10/16/04)
    • Re: Earthquake shakes up stupid japs tj Frazir (10/15/04)
  • Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity EjP (10/15/04)
  • re:Earthquake shakes up gravity DAH (10/15/04)
    • Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity David Harper (10/15/04)
  • Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity hanson (10/15/04)
    • Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity Mike (10/16/04)
• Re: Classified go away twitt tj Frazir (10/15/04)
• 18 Days & Counting... Nomen Nescio (10/15/04)
  • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Creighton Hogg (10/15/04)
    • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Nomen Nescio (10/15/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/15/04)
    • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Daniel Joseph Min (10/15/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Eric Gisse (10/15/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Daniel Joseph Min (10/15/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... U.O (10/15/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Daniel Joseph Min (10/16/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/16/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Chris Krolczyk (10/17/04)
  • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/15/04)
    • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Cardinal Chunder (10/15/04)
    • Re: 18 Days & Counting... lensman1955 (10/16/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/16/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Tom McDonald (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Tom McDonald (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Tom McDonald (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Tom McDonald (10/18/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Chuck (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Chuck (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Chuck (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Chuck (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Tom McDonald (10/17/04)
      • Re: 18 Days & Counting... ZZBunker (10/17/04)
  • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Cicero (10/16/04)
    • Re: 18 Days & Counting... Daniel Joseph Min (10/16/04)
    • 15 Days & Counting... Nomen Nescio (10/17/04)
      • Re: 15 Days & Counting... Ernest Hammingweight (10/18/04)
      • Re: 15 Days & Counting... Keith Wood (10/19/04)
• Operation Troll Shoulder 10/14/2004 Morituri-Max (10/15/04)
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 10/14/2004 tj Frazir (10/15/04)
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 10/14/2004 trivett (10/15/04)
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder 10/14/2004 Morituri-Max (10/15/04)
• Pioneer 10/11 Space Probe Anomaly Jack Sarfatti (10/14/04)
  • Re: Pioneer 10/11 Space Probe Anomaly John Sefton (10/15/04)
    • Re: Pioneer 10/11 Space Probe Anomaly John Sefton (10/15/04)
• Article: Nuclear equipment vanishes in Iraq Robert Karl Stonjek (10/14/04)
  • Re: Article: garbage wrote by idiots tj Frazir (10/15/04)
  • Re: Article: New sci BUSTED in lies tj Frazir (10/15/04)
    • Re: Article: New sci BUSTED in lies LeeRyder (10/15/04)
      • Re: Article: New sci BUSTED in lies tj Frazir (10/15/04)
      • Re: Article: New sci BUSTED in lies Mark Fergerson (10/15/04)
• FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Clay Denski (10/14/04)
  • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Old Man (10/15/04)
    • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. zigoteau (10/15/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/15/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. robert j. kolker (10/15/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/16/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Anthony Cerrato (10/16/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Randy Poe (10/15/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. robert j. kolker (10/15/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Myxococcus xanthus (10/16/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Eugene Stefanovich (10/15/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/15/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. zigoteau (10/16/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Edward Green (10/18/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Eric Gisse (10/16/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. zigoteau (10/17/04)
    • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/15/04)
      • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Old Man (10/16/04)
  • Re: FTL causality problems. I don't get it. Edward Green (10/17/04)
• Re: Strong Magnetic Field Room -- Effect Body? Ian Stirling (10/14/04)
  • Re: Strong Magnetic Field Room -- Effect Body? Dan Bloomquist (10/14/04)
    • Re: Strong Magnetic Field Room -- Effect Body? Ian Stirling (10/14/04)
      • Re: Strong Magnetic Field Room -- Effect Body? Ian Stirling (10/14/04)
  • Re: Strong Magnetic Field Room -- Effect Body? Ian Stirling (10/15/04)
  • Re: Strong Magnetic Field Room -- Effect Body? Sam Wormley (10/15/04)
• Re: entanglement question Gregory L. Hansen (10/14/04)
• Center of Mass vs. Center of Gravity walketd (10/14/04)
  • Re: Center of Mass vs. Center of Gravity Uncle Al (10/14/04)
  • Re: Center of Mass vs. Center of Gravity Almost Valid (10/14/04)
  • Re: Center of Mass vs. Center of Gravity Old Man (10/15/04)
• GRAVITATION DEFINED GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (10/14/04)
  • Re: GRAVITATION DEFINED Morituri-Max (10/15/04)
    • Re: GRAVITATION DEFINED Sam Wormley (10/15/04)
      • Re: GRAVITATION DEFINED Morituri-Max (10/15/04)
      • Re: GRAVITATION DEFINED mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
• Modern physics dependency graph Eugene Smith (10/14/04)
  • Re: Modern physics dependency graph Uncle Al (10/15/04)
  • Re: Modern physics dependency graph Malcolm (10/19/04)
  • Re: Modern physics dependency graph Francois Belfort (10/19/04)
  • Re: Modern physics dependency graph Patrick Bakx (10/22/04)
• How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Semanwq (10/14/04)
  • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Sam Wormley (10/14/04)
  • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Uncle Al (10/14/04)
  • Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? Michael J. Strickland (10/14/04)
• Hmmm - a robust arguement? Murf (10/14/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/14/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/14/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Llanzlan Klazmon (10/14/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Allen Whittaker (10/14/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Peter Webb (10/15/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Ray Vingnutte (10/15/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Benign Vanilla (10/15/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? baskitcaise (10/15/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Paul Lawler (10/15/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Matt Giwer (10/14/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Allen Whittaker (10/14/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (10/14/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Southern Hospitality (10/14/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Uncle Al (10/14/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? John Sefton (10/14/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Paul Cardinale (10/14/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? richard miller (10/14/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Gary Cavie (10/14/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? richard miller (10/14/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? ~misfit~ (10/14/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Joann Evans (10/15/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Karl Heinz Buchegger (10/15/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Joann Evans (10/16/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Paul Lawler (10/15/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Gregory L. Hansen (10/14/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Matt Giwer (10/14/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Joann Evans (10/15/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? EjP (10/14/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? ~misfit~ (10/14/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Joann Evans (10/15/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? baskitcaise (10/15/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Matt Giwer (10/14/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Joann Evans (10/14/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Old Man (10/15/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Paul Lawler (10/15/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Victor (10/15/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Mark Fergerson (10/15/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Victor (10/18/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? baskitcaise (10/15/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? ZZBunker (10/15/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Joe (10/15/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Double-A (10/17/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Imperishable Stars (10/17/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Double-A (10/17/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? nightbat (10/17/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Imperishable Stars (10/17/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? nightbat (10/18/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Double-A (10/18/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? nightbat (10/18/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Pierre (10/17/04)
      • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Morituri-Max (10/17/04)
      • Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Victor (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? beavith (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Rick (10/18/04)
      • Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/19/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx bullshit tj Frazir (10/19/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx bullshit LeeRyder (10/24/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx bullshit Maleki (10/24/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx bullshit tj Frazir (10/25/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/19/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Rick (10/19/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Morituri-Max (10/19/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/19/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Maleki (10/20/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/19/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/20/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Watson & Parisi (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Rick (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Monkey FourSevenZeroOne (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Maleki (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Rick (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Maleki (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Rick (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Maleki (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Rick (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Maleki (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Rick (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Maleki (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Rick (10/23/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? John S. Dyson (10/23/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Richard Henry (10/24/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? MrPepper11 (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Gregory L. Hansen (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Maleki (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Johnny Bravo (10/24/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Rick (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Norman Yarvin (10/23/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/24/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Maleki (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/21/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Marty Feldman (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? Emma Chase VanCott (10/19/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Rick (10/20/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/20/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Rick (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Watson & Parisi (10/22/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) John S. Dyson (10/23/04)
      • Re: Bush Rx Psychoactive Use?? (was: Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement?) Keith F. Lynch (10/25/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Paul Bramscher (10/21/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? robert j. kolker (10/19/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Paul Cardinale (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Rick (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Paul Lawler (10/20/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? nightbat (10/20/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Double-A (10/21/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? nightbat (10/21/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Paul Bramscher (10/25/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Uncle Al (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? hanson (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? robert j. kolker (10/19/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? EjP (10/18/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Cheetah (10/19/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Double-A (10/19/04)
      • Re: Kerry 1 NASA 0 was Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/19/04)
      • Hubble is ancient history Matt Giwer (10/19/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Knoppix User (10/19/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history David Woolley (10/19/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Keith Wood (10/19/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Matt Giwer (10/20/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Derek Lyons (10/20/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Matt Giwer (10/22/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Keith Wood (10/21/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Matt Giwer (10/23/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Gregory L. Hansen (10/19/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Matt Giwer (10/20/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Derek Lyons (10/20/04)
      • Re: Hubble is ancient history Matt Giwer (10/23/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Paul Draper (10/18/04)
  • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? Apollo (10/22/04)
    • Re: Hmmm - a robust arguement? nightbat (10/22/04)
• Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/14/04)
  • Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
    • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Uncle Al (10/14/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Uncle Al (10/14/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Richard Schultz (10/17/04)
    • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/14/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/15/04)
    • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/14/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/14/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Gregory L. Hansen (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Gregory L. Hansen (10/16/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Gregory L. Hansen (10/16/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Creighton Hogg (10/16/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/16/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/16/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/16/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/17/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/18/04)
      • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Eugene Shubert (10/18/04)
    • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) ZZBunker (10/14/04)
    • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) ZZBunker (10/14/04)
    • Re: Avoiding Tripping Points in Special Relativity (was Basics series proposed) Bilge (10/16/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed Uncle Al (10/14/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/14/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Myxococcus xanthus (10/16/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/18/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/14/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Uncle Al (10/14/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/14/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (10/14/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed Bilge (10/14/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Myxococcus xanthus (10/16/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/15/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/15/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed ande452_at_attglobal.net (10/16/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/16/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed xxein (10/15/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/15/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/15/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed xxein (10/17/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/18/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed xxein (10/20/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/20/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed xxein (10/17/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed Old Man (10/15/04)
  • re:Basics series proposed Nth Complexity (10/15/04)
    • Re: re:Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/16/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/18/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/18/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/18/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/19/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/20/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/21/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/18/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/18/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/18/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/18/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/19/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed Ilja Schmelzer (10/15/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/15/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/15/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (10/16/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/16/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/20/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Creighton Hogg (10/20/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/20/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/21/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/21/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Gregory L. Hansen (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/22/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul B. Andersen (10/22/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/22/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/22/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/22/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/22/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/23/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Gregory L. Hansen (10/24/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Gregory L. Hansen (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Timo Nieminen (10/26/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/24/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/24/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/25/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/26/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/26/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/28/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/28/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/28/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/29/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/29/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/30/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/30/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Eric Gisse (10/30/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Jim Greenfield (10/31/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/28/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/26/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/26/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/26/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/27/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed xxein (10/22/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Androcles (10/23/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed FrediFizzx (10/21/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Paul Draper (10/21/04)
    • Re: Basics series proposed Myxococcus xanthus (10/21/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Bjoern Feuerbacher (10/21/04)
      • Re: Basics series proposed Dirk Van de moortel (10/21/04)
  • Re: Basics series proposed Patrick Reany (10/22/04)
• Cellular automata simulations Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (10/14/04)
  • Re: Cellular automata simulations Uncle Al (10/14/04)
    • Re: Cellular automata simulations Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (10/19/04)
    • Re: Cellular automata simulations Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (10/20/04)
• Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS REM460 (10/14/04)
  • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Morituri-Max (10/14/04)
    • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Creighton Hogg (10/14/04)
      • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Morituri-Max (10/15/04)
  • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Uncle Al (10/14/04)
    • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS tj Frazir (10/15/04)
  • Re: Physical FORCE - interaction of potentual energy tj Frazir (10/15/04)
  • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Bill Hobba (10/19/04)
    • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Rich.Andrews (10/20/04)
      • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Twittering One (10/20/04)
      • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS briggs_at_encompasserve.org (10/26/04)
      • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Bill Hobba (10/20/04)
  • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Uncle Al (10/19/04)
  • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Mitchell (10/20/04)
  • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS EL (10/20/04)
  • Re: Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS Patrick Reany (10/20/04)
• "JOSE" WE ARE COMING TO SPILL YOUR BLOOD CUNT Laurence Godfrey (10/14/04)
  • Re: "JOSE" WE ARE COMING TO SPILL YOUR BLOOD CUNT Morituri-Max (10/14/04)
  • Re: "JOSE" WE ARE COMING TO SPILL YOUR BLOOD CUNT ann hedonia (10/14/04)
    • Re: "JOSE" WE ARE COMING TO SPILL YOUR BLOOD CUNT Si (10/14/04)
  • Re: "JOSE" WE ARE COMING TO SPILL YOUR BLOOD ... laurence godfrey (10/20/04)
    • Re: "JOSE" WE ARE COMING TO SPILL YOUR BLOOD ... _at_Damski (10/20/04)
      • Re: "JOSE" WE ARE COMING TO SPILL YOUR BLOOD ... Dave J (10/20/04)
• Worker bees. Jeff Relf (10/14/04)
• Composite fibres light up Sam Wormley (10/14/04)
  • Re: JPL Unveil Superconductor tj Frazir (10/14/04)
  • Re: Composite fibres light up JPL vrs MIT tj Frazir (10/14/04)
• Quantum Zeno effect Zdzis (10/14/04)
  • Re: Quantum Zeno effect Uncle Al (10/14/04)
• The Oregon Vortex Maximus (10/14/04)
  • Re: The Oregon Vortex Dan Bloomquist (10/13/04)
  • Re: The Oregon Vortex Uncle Al (10/13/04)
  • Re: The Oregon Vortex Mark Martin (10/14/04)
• GRAVITY GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (10/13/04)
• GRAVITY GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (10/13/04)
• 20 Days & Counting... Nomen Nescio (10/13/04)
• Where Do We Stand? Dan Bloomquist (10/13/04)
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 704 October 13, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (10/13/04)
• linear momentum storage got answers? (10/13/04)
  • Re: linear momentum storage John T Lowry (10/13/04)
  • Re: linear momentum storage EjP (10/13/04)
  • Re: linear momentum storage mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/13/04)
• *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE *** Dr. Mohib. N. Durrani (10/13/04)
  • Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE *** Repeating Rifle (10/13/04)
    • Here we go again Was: HILAL (Crescent Moon)... Shawn (10/13/04)
      • Re: Here we go again Was: HILAL (Crescent Moon)... Shawn (10/13/04)
      • Re: Here we go again Was: HILAL (Crescent Moon)... Eric (10/14/04)
    • Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE *** rander3127 (10/13/04)
    • Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE *** Product developer (10/14/04)
      • OT: Historical Amnesia (was: Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE ***) Christian Wilms (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mark Fergerson (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Michael (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Christian Wilms (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mark Fergerson (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mark Fergerson (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia John Savard (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia tj Frazir (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mark Fergerson (10/29/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia T.T. (10/29/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia vonroach (10/29/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mark Fergerson (10/30/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia John Savard (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia John Savard (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Dave (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia farooq_w_at_hotmail.com (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia farooq_w_at_hotmail.com (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Repeating Rifle (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Dirk Bruere at Neopax (10/21/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/21/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/22/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/22/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/23/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Morituri-Max (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia tadchem (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia operator jay (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Bob Cain (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia T.T. (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia John Savard (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/22/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia John Savard (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/20/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/20/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Tom McDonald (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Thomas Lee Elifritz (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Gregory L. Hansen (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mohammed Farooq (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia vonroach (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Christian Wilms (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mark Fergerson (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia T.T. (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Ioannis (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/20/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mohammed Farooq (10/20/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mark Fergerson (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia tj Frazir (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Tim Eastham (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mark Fergerson (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Gregory L. Hansen (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Tim Eastham (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Mark Fergerson (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia T.T. (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Tim Eastham (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Repeating Rifle (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Tim Eastham (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Repeating Rifle (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia markzoom (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Repeating Rifle (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Bob Cain (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia starburst (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/20/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/20/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Repeating Rifle (10/20/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia AES/newspost (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Maleki (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/29/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo A. Nieminen (10/30/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/30/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/30/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/30/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/30/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia (was: Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE ***) mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Shawn (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Shawn (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Alpha Omega (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Repeating Rifle (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Alpha Omega (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/17/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/18/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/19/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/20/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/21/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/21/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/21/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/21/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/22/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/22/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/25/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/22/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/24/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Paul Draper (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/29/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/29/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/28/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/27/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Patrick Powers (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/26/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Timo Nieminen (10/21/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/21/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia hanson (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia (was: Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE ***) Gregory L. Hansen (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia Gregory L. Hansen (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia robert j. kolker (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia West Coast Engineering (10/14/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia (was: Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE ***) ZZBunker (10/15/04)
      • Re: OT: Historical Amnesia (was: Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE ***) ZZBunker (10/15/04)
      • Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - USA/Canada - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE *** West Coast Engineering (10/14/04)
• *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - WORLD - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE *** Dr. Mohib. N. Durrani (10/13/04)
  • Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - WORLD - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE *** Uncle Al (10/13/04)
    • Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING - WORLD - for RAMADAN (Month of Fasting) 1425 AH, Evening of Thu/Fri 14/15 Oct 2004 CE *** Jonathan Silverlight (10/13/04)
• NASA Pioneer Anomaly Explained? Jack Sarfatti (10/13/04)
• conservation of energy? baldcoley (10/13/04)
  • Re: conservation of energy? Sam Wormley (10/13/04)
  • Re: conservation of energy? Uncle Al (10/13/04)
  • Re: conservation of energy? Old Man (10/14/04)
• A; Dynamics on a slide Andy Resnick (10/13/04)
  • Re: A; Dynamics on a slide Ken Muldrew (10/13/04)
  • Re: A; Dynamics on a slide John T Lowry (10/13/04)
  • Re: A; Dynamics on a slide Edward Green (10/13/04)
    • Re: A; Dynamics on a slide Andy Resnick (10/14/04)
    • Re: A; Dynamics on a slide Mel Lep (10/14/04)
      • Re: A; Dynamics on a slide Andy Resnick (10/15/04)
• Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma John T Lowry (10/13/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Ken S. Tucker (10/13/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Alfred Einstead (10/14/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Uncle Al (10/13/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma Ken Muldrew (10/13/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/15/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/15/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/15/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma Bruce Durdle (10/15/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/15/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/15/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/15/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Creighton Hogg (10/13/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma Ken Muldrew (10/13/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Mark Martin (10/13/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Bob Van Arsdale (10/13/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Edward Green (10/13/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/14/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Bruce Durdle (10/14/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma Ken S. Tucker (10/14/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/14/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Alfred Einstead (10/14/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Richard Herring (10/14/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Steven Gray (10/15/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/15/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma David Harper (10/15/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/15/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Paul Victor Birke (10/16/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/17/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/17/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/17/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/17/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/17/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/17/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/18/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/18/04)
    • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/18/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma Paul E. Bennett (10/18/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/23/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma Gregory L. Hansen (10/24/04)
      • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/24/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/18/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/23/04)
  • Re: Six Sigma charliew2 (10/24/04)
• Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/13/04)
  • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/13/04)
    • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/13/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/15/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/15/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/18/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Henri Wilson (10/19/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/19/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/19/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/20/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/19/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/19/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/19/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/20/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/20/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/21/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/22/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/22/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/23/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/24/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts YBM (10/24/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts greywolf42 (10/24/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Eugene Shubert (10/25/04)
      • Re: A Challenge for the Experts Henri Wilson (10/24/04)
• The Paradox of Zeno Espilcq (10/13/04)
  • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Sam Wormley (10/13/04)
    • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Jim Greenfield (10/13/04)
  • Re: The Paradox of Zeno Uncle Al (10/13/04)
  • Re: The Paradox of Zeno The Ghost In The Machine (10/14/04)
• Is the 5f6 Schrodinger Eq. a helix Re: explanation for Quantum Strangeness Re: quantization of circles by rectangles and vice versa Archimedes Plutonium (10/13/04)
• Re: Need help with Projectile Motion problem matt911_at_gmail.com (10/13/04)
• 20 Days & Counting... Nomen Nescio (10/13/04)
• Re: SUNFLOWER OIL TO POWER FUTURE CARS Virism Pro_Virism (10/13/04)
• a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system richardconers_at_yahoo.com (10/13/04)
  • Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Uncle Al (10/13/04)
    • Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Morituri-Max (10/13/04)
    • Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system John Sefton (10/13/04)
  • Re: a question on incompatibility of properties in a one particle system Sam Wormley (10/13/04)
• non-separability of 2 particle systems in quantum mechanics richardconers_at_yahoo.com (10/12/04)
  • Re: non-separability of 2 particle systems in quantum mechanics John Sefton (10/13/04)
• Does anyone know what Ferrofluid from Ferrofluidics Corp is made of? Jack Dempsey (10/12/04)
• Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/12/04)
  • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/12/04)
    • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Creighton Hogg (10/12/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/12/04)
    • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/12/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/12/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/13/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Uncle Al (10/13/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Uncle Al (10/13/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/13/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (10/13/04)
      • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (10/13/04)
    • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Paul Draper (10/13/04)
    • Re: Annealing of Radiation Damage Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
• Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Callipygian Nullifidian (10/12/04)
  • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Callipygian Nullifidian (10/12/04)
    • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? robert j. kolker (10/12/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? ZZBunker (10/13/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Ghod (10/15/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? robert j. kolker (10/16/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Ghod (10/18/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? robert j. kolker (10/18/04)
  • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Androcles (10/12/04)
  • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
    • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/13/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/13/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/13/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (10/14/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/14/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? Dirk Van de moortel (10/13/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? AllYou! (10/13/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? G=EMC^2 Glazier (10/13/04)
      • Re: Einstein's performance as a Patent Examiner? robert j. kolker (10/13/04)
• Gravitomagnetism Ziggi (10/12/04)
  • re:Gravitomagnetism Amr Morsi (10/12/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism robert bristow-johnson (10/13/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Louis Nielsen (10/17/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (10/18/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism Gregory L. Hansen (10/13/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (10/15/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (10/17/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (10/19/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (10/20/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (10/22/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (10/24/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (10/24/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (10/25/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (10/27/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Timothy Golden (10/19/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (10/19/04)
• Gravitomagnetism Ziggi (10/12/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism Tom Roberts (10/13/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Androcles (10/13/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ziggi (10/13/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism Tom Roberts (10/13/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ziggi (10/13/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism zigoteau (10/13/04)
• Polarisation of a gravitational wave Ziggi (10/12/04)
  • Re: Polarisation of a gravitational wave Tom Roberts (10/12/04)
    • Re: Polarisation of a grav