Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: linking superconductivity and fusion Re: can it see the atoms during superconduction? Re: New electron microscope can actually see atoms; see Pu and see Superconductivity atoms??"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities"
- In reply to: Paul Draper: "How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Next in thread: RP: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: RP: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: Paul Draper: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: mike3: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:59:20 -0400
Paul Draper wrote:
>
> Alternative-theory flamers: the onus is on you to point accurately to the
> failing of the theory.
The burden of proof of a theory lies squarely on the one proposing it.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: linking superconductivity and fusion Re: can it see the atoms during superconduction? Re: New electron microscope can actually see atoms; see Pu and see Superconductivity atoms??"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities"
- In reply to: Paul Draper: "How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Next in thread: RP: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: RP: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: Paul Draper: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Reply: mike3: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
