Brian Greene's Higgs Ocean and its implications for Haisch, Puthoff, Rueda ZPE inertia model

From: Jack Sarfatti (sarfatti_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 10/02/04 

Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 00:26:17 GMT

"The Higgs Ocean and the Origin of Mass
  If the Higgs field has a nonzero value - if we are all immersed in an
ocean of Higgs field - then shouldn't we feel it or see it or otherwise
be aware of it in some way? ... why objects resist acceleration ... The
Higgs ocean in which ... we are all immersed interacts with quarks and
electrons: it resists their accelerations ... and this drag ...
contributes to what you perceive as mass ... And so we do feel the Higgs
ocean." pp 260-261 of "The Fabric of the Cosmos" by Brian Greene.

Higgs Ocean = Vacuum Coherence.

More precisely

Vacuum Coherence = (Higgs Field)e^i(Goldstone Phase)

Einstein's gravity emerges as ripples in the Goldstone Phase.

Both dark energy and dark matter emerge as ripples in the Higgs Field.

Now in the ordinary non-exotic weightless vacuum that neither gravitates
as "dark matter" nor anti-gravitates as "dark energy", we have the
optimal vacuum coherence. That is

Total Observable Random Zero Point Energy Density = (Bare Zero Point
Energy Density)[(Quantum of Volume)(Higgs Field)^2 - 1]

The ordinary non-exotic vacuum in which we measure the mass of the
electron has

Total Observable Random Zero Point Energy Density = 0

This means that

(Higgs Field)^2 = (Quantum of Volume)^-1

Origin of Inertia is ~ MACRO QUANTUM COHERENT Higgs Field

not to the RANDOM INCOHERENT transverse polarized virtual photons alone
as Haisch, Puthoff and Rueda allege. That is the point.

How does the electron get its inertia? In this ordinary vacuum with ZERO
RANDOM zero point energy density and zero ZPF pressure for each species
of particle separately, hence no Casimir force from ZPF pressure only
from VdW induced dipoles, The false vacuum massless charged Dirac spin
1/2 quantum field has the coupling

g(Higgs Field Quantum)(Massless Electron Spinor)*(Massless Electron Spinor)

Then in the pre->post inflationary false -> true vacuum phase transition
with emergent MACRO-QUANTUM VACUUM COHERENCE = FORMATION OF THE COHERENT
HIGGS OCEAN

m(electron) ~ 10^-27 grams ~ g(Higgs Field) a macro-quantum coherent
true vacuum expectation value.

Now to do this right, we have to replace the rigid window Fourier
transforms by multi-resolution wavelet transforms.

That is we can no longer use the Dirac transformation functions

<q|p> = e^ipg/hbar

So the dark energy we see at large scale need not have a strong effect
on the lepto-quark rest masses at much smaller scale. That is we have
scale power spectrum of the Higgs field to deal with.

We then have to connect m(electron) with a micro-geon of Wheeler's "Mass
without mass" as a Bohm hidden variable with an effective G* ~ 10^40G on
the 10^-13 cm scale.

Not only do we automatically get the correct Arrow of Time for the
Second Law of Thermodynamics hooked to the expansion of space, but we
also explain WHY NO ANTI-MATTER. That is, our universe must have a dual
universe i.e. two parallel branes in which all the OPEN STRINGS are
actually little Wheeler wormholes whose mouths end on the two different
branes. A string is equivalent to a wormhole. The closed electric flux
tubes are quantized because of the single-valuedness of the
macro-quantum vacuum coherence local order parameter and in our universe
brane all of the electron wormholes have their flux lines entering the
mouths and exiting the mouths on the dual parallel brane next door
across a small distance in hyperspace.

On Sep 27, 2004, at 3:26 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

expanded typo-corrected 2nd draft from earlier message

Casimir Force: The irrelevant explanation of EVOs for the wrong reasons

On Sep 25, 2004, at 12:04 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Remember, macro-quantum vacuum coherence hides random micro-quantum zero
point vacuum energy under the rug. Any random zero point energy that
leaks out is exotic vacuum that contributes to the cosmological constant
either as dark energy or dark matter depending on the sign of the
pressure negative or positive respectively. Dark energy at a distance is
a universal repulsive antigravity field. Dark matter at a distance is a
universal attractive gravity field. Both fields can be stronger than
what is expected from Newton’s constant. That is the effective Planck
energy is smaller than 10^19Gev. However, as possibly in the case of Ken
Shoulders “charge clusters” the effective forces inside an extended
exotic vacuum region can change sign! Indeed, that is why the EVO is
stable and that is also why the single electron is stable.

Alexander Burinskii in Moscow has rightly raised the issue of the
distinction between renormalization and regularization of interacting
field Feynman diagrams in special relativistic quantum field
perturbation theory expansions in relation to the zero point energy
problem. We need to see how all these ideas survive in quantum field
theory in a c-number curved space dynamical background like in Birrell
and Davies text book "Quantum Fields in Curved Space". The issue of the
reality of quantum gravity foam of Einstein metric field Heisenberg
uncertainty fluctuations is problematical in the soft condensed matter
physics approach to gravity as a bottom-up emergent ODLRO macro-quantum
phenomenon. That is gravity is a low energy effective c-number ODLRO
macro-quantum coherent field theory that in principle is not to be
quantized in the usual way the way QED is done. This feature is now
being tested in gamma ray astronomy.

Why do Milonni's two naive free virtual photon field models of the
Casimir force ~ hcA/d4 as virtual photon effects give, like Ptolemy’s
epicycles, closed to the correct empirical answer for the wrong reasons?

In the simple boundary condition model using only free virtual photons
Milonni computes

E(d) - E(infinity)

and he gets the cutoff-independent correct answer.

However, what he should compute is

E(d) + E(L - d)

Letting L >> d at the end.

The virtual photon ZPF force is then the negative gradient of this sum.
This vanishes in 1 + 1 space-time.

The cosmological constant problem is that E(d) + E(L - d) is directly
observable in general relativity. This is why Hal's "Type II Casimir
Force" model is unacceptable because it requires a huge cosmological
constant vacuum energy filling all space outside Ken Shoulders
EVOs which have zero ZPE inside their charged shells at least below h/mc
short wave cutoff. This contradicts general relativity that is the
covering theory here. Any result from unstable globally flat quantum
field theory that contradicts general relativity must be rejected. That
is the basic problem with what Hal Puthoff is suggesting for metric
engineering of warp, wormhole and weapon. Puthoff’s PV version of
gravity is not consistent with Einstein’s general relativity as shown by
his own assistant Michael Ibison. Lest, there be any confusion, I am not
suggesting that the direct warping of space-time by zero point energy
density is the explanation of the Casimir force. Indeed, the Casimir
force as a direct electrostatic force of mutually induced dipoles in the
uncharged conductors is observable only in the absenceof such strong
zero point warping of space-time. I am suggesting that Ken Shoulders
EVOs have such strong warping and have nothing to do with the Casimir
force at all in the dominating approximation. Therefore, as Ian
Peterson says, the Casimir force is not a way to tap the zero point
vacuum energy of the virtual photons as the popular literature
suggests. The only energy you can recover from the Casimir force is the
weak mutually induced dipole electrostatic energies. Using the Casimir
force as a pedagogical tool for zero point energy physics is profoundly
misleading.

 

Relevant Pages

  • Brian Greenes Higgs Ocean and its implications for Haisch, Puthoff, Rueda ZPE inertia model
    ... "The Higgs Ocean and the Origin of Mass ... Higgs Ocean = Vacuum Coherence. ... Both dark energy and dark matter emerge as ripples in the Higgs Field. ... Total Observable Random Zero Point Energy Density = (Bare Zero Point ...
    (sci.math)
  • Brian Greenes Higgs Ocean and its implications for Haisch, Puthoff, Rueda ZPE inertia model
    ... "The Higgs Ocean and the Origin of Mass ... Higgs Ocean = Vacuum Coherence. ... Both dark energy and dark matter emerge as ripples in the Higgs Field. ... Total Observable Random Zero Point Energy Density = (Bare Zero Point ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: QFT question
    ... |> Bet you get zero EM field strength. ... it has a Gaussian shape (just like the ground state of the ... |> result that the EM vacuum state has infinite energy. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
    ... Peacock's theorem neglects vacuum coherence entirely and leads to the ... constraints of Einstein's gravity theory completely. ... Laplacian of Gravity Potential Energy Per Unit Test Particle Mass = ... Part A Special Relativity requires w = -1 for ALL zero point quantum ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
    ... Peacock's theorem neglects vacuum coherence entirely and leads to the ... constraints of Einstein's gravity theory completely. ... Laplacian of Gravity Potential Energy Per Unit Test Particle Mass = ... Part A Special Relativity requires w = -1 for ALL zero point quantum ...
    (sci.astro)