Re: IS high energy physics real ?
From: ZZBunker (zzbunker_at_netscape.net)
Date: 10/03/04
- Next message: Morituri-Max: "Re: OpTrollShoulder Weekend Update 10-2-2004"
- Previous message: Y.Porat: "Re: nuclear shell model periodic table"
- In reply to: eighth man: "IS high energy physics real ?"
- Next in thread: eighth man: "re:IS high energy physics real ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Oct 2004 00:12:10 -0700
eighth@libero-dot-it.no-spam.invalid (eighth man) wrote in message news:<415f1eaa$1_1@127.0.0.1>...
> I have a few questions:
>
> 1) I read that particle physics uses
> accelarators and computers to compare
> results according to Feynman diagrams.
> According to the precision these diagrams
> may be 70 or 40000 and eventually millions
> to trillions all very complex to calcuate.
> At what point (decimal point;) will scientists
> think the precision will be enough ? (a trilllion
> feynman diagrams?) And if so will they be
> even able to calcuate it ? and even after won't
> they be curious to know if a higher precision
> could lead to something else ?
They will never get enough presicion,
to get beyond 2 decimal places of quantifiable
predictivity.
So if pi=3.14 is close enough for
the idiots in Euclidean stooge geometry,
it's also close enough for Jesus and GAWD.
The idiots where told
when they started the "program" in
the Apollo days, that masturbation
diagrams from statistical dynamics
are not only useless for prediction,
but we also developed perturbation theory,
for that purpose.
So that Feynmann and his fellow cold "fusion"
Chemist moron flock of apples can do their
tales of light of matter fusion in the UN.
Since the UN are the only known morons in the
entire universe that would actually
care what a Feynmann diagram would predict
to begin with.
>
> 2) after the grand theory of everything is
> achieved maybe 300 years from now, will
> scientists still study all the theoretical structures
> anyways even if it has no use for physics anymore ?
>
> 3) particle accelarators, theories, computers
> etc. seem quite distant from reality... it makes
> me think sometime"is it real ?"
> I mean there is only one level seperating a
> virtual reality program from reality (the program)
> whereas in particle physics we have about 5 or 6
> (accelerators, theories, computers, calcuations etc)
>
>
> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.usenet.com
- Next message: Morituri-Max: "Re: OpTrollShoulder Weekend Update 10-2-2004"
- Previous message: Y.Porat: "Re: nuclear shell model periodic table"
- In reply to: eighth man: "IS high energy physics real ?"
- Next in thread: eighth man: "re:IS high energy physics real ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|