Re: Physics is pretty lame !
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 10/03/04
- Next message: Martin Hogbin: "Re: IS high energy physics real ?"
- Previous message: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: Superluminal velocity experiment"
- In reply to: Brian Raab: "Physics is pretty lame !"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Physics is pretty lame !"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Physics is pretty lame !"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:57:51 GMT
Brian Raab wrote:
> Better play Poker, it's something real men do!
Poker
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Poker.html
Probability
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/topics/Probability.html
- Next message: Martin Hogbin: "Re: IS high energy physics real ?"
- Previous message: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: Superluminal velocity experiment"
- In reply to: Brian Raab: "Physics is pretty lame !"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Physics is pretty lame !"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Physics is pretty lame !"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]