Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits

From: glbrad01 (glbrad01_at_insightbb.com)
Date: 10/03/04 

Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 14:26:59 GMT

  You are wrong in speaking in such generality. Life expectancy has not
increased generally in the world much more than it was in 1900. And, as we
have increased our artificial defenses against the older diseases and other
illnesses, more and different, ever newer, diseases and other illnesses have
evolved. At the same time the older set have evolved ever higher levels,
ever more savage, insidious and sophisticated natures of their own virulence
against our artificial defenses and attacks upon them. Oddly, the only real
defenses that have kept up with all this offensive evolution has been our
usual natural defenses, the immune systems humans came with from the
beginning. We aid these natural defenses with good hygiene to a certain
degree. Our vast variety of foods, including fast foods, and how they are
processed and packaged, are a vast improvement over anything before in
history. In other words, we've made it harder for our food supply to be
attacked.

  For every action there is an equal but reaction. The world's food supply,
at its source of flora and fauna and so on, is growing ever weaker, ever
more delicate. This is what happens when artifice is too long away, or has
been too well protected, from any natural testing for fitness to survive and
prosper. Now things get into the theory of chaos and the science of
complexity and collapse. Too long away, and too well protected, is life far
too ruled, meaning life far too clinically controlled: life becoming
laboratory or hothouse sterile. Our food supply is becoming puny right in a
reflection of us and our civilization in general, its masters and gods so to
speak, and in particularly our scientists and scientific establishments, our
intellectual elites, becoming puny (puny-minded in particular within
particular): One of the unintended consequences of iron curtain isolation
from frontier universe (isolation from raw, alien, and harsh natural
testing--for fitness to survive and prosper--frontiers). Things that are
nothing in an open system become something in a closed system. Entropy
increases and energy diminishes in a closed system. "Competition becomes
more severe as the destruction of distance intensifies the confrontation of
states" (both natural and artificial states)--Will Durant, The Story of
Civilization and The Lessons of History.

  If we had a frontier, if we were in frontier condition such as spreading,
expanding and growing all life in space colonization, we'd have an
energetically opening, virtually unlimited, system countering more and more
the above problems of closed systemic world: the infinitizing problems
inherent or adherent to [one] world naked singularity. As physicist Michio
Kaku observed, we have grown one million fold in size over the last two
million years, but that is nothing in itself. What is the something is that
we have increased two million fold in energies, powers, complexities, and an
almost tele-kinetic reaches in a vast overlapping of reaches, average per
every man, woman, and child, living, over the same span of time (two million
years). One million fold of which increase has occurred in just the last
century. This vastness of time-distance destroying energies and powers has
reached itself deep into the Wild of Earth also bringing closer and closer
together, forcing confrontations between, every species of life on Earth:
confrontational conditions that never existed before in natural history.
Increasing the strength of the control state over Man doesn't do a bit of
good as history has proved physics. Increasing the strength of the control
state concomitantly reduces the reach of the same state proportionately to
that increase in strength. It becomes irresistibly immovable and blackholes,
so to speak. So what to do? Open up the system. Increasingly birth the more
or less developed life from the womb into a larger universe, its inherent
destination, or abort it (Armageddon). There is no such thing as a species
evolving to a species such as Star Trek depicts, the single world
super-being Organians to be exact. Every natural law in the Universe forbids
it.

  Natural law, confirmed by natural history and our own recorded history,
tells us that the sheer tyranny of enforced isolation from the Universe at
large evolves ever increasing stupidity, power's ever increasing corruption,
the cooperative state's decline and fall into dark ages, failure of test by
not bothering to take the test, rather than every increasing intelligence
and wisdom. As a man named Crevecouer once said of a space frontier's
vastness, the American Frontier of 1774 to be exact, such vastness naturally
enlarges the energy and the general mind and development of all who
enter--proportionately.

   The first microscopic energy cell of life on Earth that ever survived to
prosper in splitting itself out into surrounding space in two of itself,
then billions and trillions and decillions and so on ever upward in numbers
of itself expanding and growing out into more surrounding space in breadth
and depth of space until it reached residence and mobility in every complex
cellular structure that is the individual of every complex species of life
alive today on Earth tells us how far complexity can go in reproducing
itself spatially for survival and prosperity. Predictions of science is that
the masses and energies and general atomic structure of this solar system
can support an expansion and growth of humans in space colonies alone--at
the apex of a general expansion and growth of a pyramid of life--to
mind-boggling numbers such as quadrillions and more of humans. Such numbers
become meaningless, just as the numbers of living cells in every cellular
life structure on Earth is relatively meaningless. What the numbers actually
mean is a form of vastly greater evolution as greater evolution is supposed
to really be and mean. The complexes we form in space, the colonies, the
ships, every kind of facilitation we form in space, the very combinative
energy, power, complexity and reach of it, all means new and higher life
form and formation. We and the rest of life that moves up and out in the
solar system, splitting out, expanding and growing, going nova into our edge
of the Universe, will inhabit this new life form, make it up like those
first cells existing on Earth still make us up today billions of years
later, but just like the more evolved, more complex life forms we are above
it, those ever higher complexes, as unitary beings in themselves, will
develop lives, instincts and awareness of their own. We will effect and be
effected by it and them just as our own cells and internal cellular
structures effect us and are effected by us for good or bad.

  What am I leading up to with all this? By spreading, expanding and
growing, in a new frontier, we can make all that is weakening now in us and
ours, in a naked singularity of one world system, a strengthening version of
self-generational wild. We would not be "fooling mother nature." We would be
playing her bigger game her grander way. There is a correlation between the
first cellular structures on Earth and the growing problem we have today in
us and our food supply. They wisely solved the natural law problem
instinctively, so to speak. We can wisely solve our problem in exactly the
same way it was solved then, but by design rather than instinct. The final
result would be similarly instinctive in the long run, I would hazard to
guess. You don't keep on tinkering in a closed system (Nature can and will
keep on raising the stakes against you to infinity if necessary), you open
up the system wide open by going nova with it, by going [wild] with the
system; by dumping on the Universe at large and melding the nature of our
increasingly laboratory sterile, hothouse sterile, lifeless artifice (the
living dead) once more with the nature of its raw, harsh, alien, vigorous,
vital, and thus fertile, wild; its dictation to grow or die: march or die.

  Finally, infinity (in its four fractal dimensionality of infinite,
infinitesimal, infinities, and last but not least universal constancy
(universal constants)) has no quality of "fabric" to it. 'Universal horizon'
isn't "empty space" either. But "medium" it is. Infinitesimal (as a
singularity) is said to be indistinguishable from zero, but it isn't
intrinsically zero by any--infinity's worth of--longshot. At the other end
of the infinity scale then, infinite (as a singularity) then would be
indistinguishable from one (uno, uni-), but it too would not be
intrinsically one by any--infinity's worth of--longshot. The Universe (its
every constituent dimension and/or element totaled up) is its own space to
time, space per time, speed of light 'universal horizon' (space to time
base: 300,000 kilometers--rounded up--of space to, or per, second of time;
10 trillion kilometers--rounded up--of space to, or per, year of time; 13.7
billion times 10 trillion kilometers of space to, or per, 13.7 billion years
of time; 76 billion times 10 trillion kilometers of space to, or per, 76
billion years of time; and so on and on and on up and/or down the scaling of
space to, or per, time--constant (as absolute an horizon as absolute horizon
can ever get)). There is no fabric medium, or aether medium (just fabric
medium by another name), to the Universe.

  What is space itself then? Substantially? Other than simply its four,
rather than three, dimensions (length, width, height, radial depth). Gravity
should be the answer to that question. Gravity simultaneously both as
infinitesimal singularity and as infinite singularity. Core
infinitesimal--infinity of point singularities and all of an infinity of
globalizations extending up and out of those points to infinite singularity
facing back. Constituent singular individualism versus, opposing, overall
singular communism, one might say. Result of gravity facing itself in
perfect opposition to itself (constant), space in four dimensions of space.

  Time, too, is substantially in four dimensions of it. History (histories),
frequency (frequencies), relativity (as in loss of and, concomitantly, gain
in), and zero ("now", here and now, there and now, everywhere "now").
Histories are effectively observed time brought upon the speed of light
across any distance of space and time to any observer. If the frequency of
time couldn't be upped or downed in changing frequencies, then nothing in
the Universe could go in motion to anywhere else in the Universe. The
distance between here and now and here and then is a graduating loss of
relativity. The distance between there and then and there and now is also a
graduating loss of relativity. No one will ever travel from here and now to
there and then. All travel is from here and now to there and now. But, the
observer can only observe there and then, never there and now, and there
will always be an ever widening, ever expanding, gap between "there and
then" and "there and now" with all accumulating distance in space and time
between observers' "here and now" (sic) and varyingly distant "there and
now" (sic). Any traveler traveling from here and now to there and now will
lose relativity to here and now and gain relativity to there and now. That
same traveler, in that same act of travel, will gradually lose relativity to
observed there and then (sic), observed at or from departure point, and
gradually gain relativity to there and now (sic) upon closing to arrival at
that destination. Concomitantly, the traveler gradually loses relativity to
here and now (sic), his departure point, and gradually gains relativity to
the here and then (sic) history of the particular departure point. An
observer never observes anything in the Universe but histories, thanks to
the speed of light, thus speed of time frame travel, curse. Thus a travel
never travels anywhere concerning time except for those same histories and
always up through a flowing history of there and thens graduating to arrival
at there and now. There are four dimensions to time and those four
dimensions can be observed, traveled, or used flexibly in multiple complex
ways.

  What is the limit of acceleration in the Universe? The outer limit of the
velocity factor--per second per second? 300,000 kilometers per second per
second? "C" per second per second? It would have to be caught suspended
forever in the permanent vise of "c", so one result would be an ever
unchanging velocity of "c"--circle right back to the universal horizon
(?)--from that outer limit of acceleration. The one result should always
instantly split in two, or come out of process, two. Now what might be the
simultaneous other result if "c" must remain "c" (constant) regardless?

  The Universe doesn't "sit" in anything but its own universal horizon,
being its own universal horizon (a wrap to itself). Thus it occupies in
whole that horizon, being in whole that horizon, while yet any being in the
Universe can observe and even make various use of whatever entity of that
same horizon it, the being, is permanently both inside and outside of (still
a wrap). Of course this universal horizon theory is filled infinitely full
of holes, including holes within holes within holes; wormholes, rabbit
holes, loopholes, etc. It has no fabric-like medium whatsoever, including
aether. And the universal horizon can never tear, rip, stretch, or anything
like these. It absolute constancy, its absolute constant, permits no such
things happening.

Brad

"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:2s896iF1i3080U2@uni-berlin.de...
>
>
> David Thomson wrote:
>
>>
>> Like I pointed out, in my genealogy I have many direct ancestors who
>> lived
>> beyond 90 years. Most of them lived well before 1900.
>
> Go by the statistics. Life expetancy has doubled since 1900. One of the
> reasons is hygene (which the ancients did not practice: Consider the
> plague which almost destroyed Athens during the time of Pericles). Other
> reason are the development of better diagnosis and better treatment, both
> the children of technology which is the god-child of science.
>
> Bob Kolker
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
    ... Too long away, and too well protected, is life far ... Civilization and The Lessons of History. ... or less developed life from the womb into a larger universe, ... Finally, infinity (in its four fractal dimensionality of infinite, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • 34 through 39.
    ... Where Were You Before The Tree of Life? ... Perhaps the most appropriate expression to describe the history of mankind ... upon this planet is a chaos or confusion. ... we know about the Universe comes somewhere after the fall of Adam. ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • 31 through 39.
    ... Where Were You Before The Tree of Life? ... Perhaps the most appropriate expression to describe the history of mankind ... upon this planet is a chaos or confusion. ... we know about the Universe comes somewhere after the fall of Adam. ...
    (talk.religion.misc)
  • Re: Texas: Board Set to Vote on Challenge to Evolution
    ... infinity or fill it completely, immortality in an infinite universe is ... either impossible to fill with life or it is life, ... What universe are you talking about? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Where Were You Before The Tree of Life?
    ... Where Were You Before The Tree of Life? ... Universe comes somewhere after the fall of Adam. ... It is the humble intent of this book to trace the history of mankind ... the Creation and about history in general. ...
    (talk.religion.newage)
Loading