From Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean - resend
From: Jack Sarfatti (sarfatti_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 10/03/04
- Next message: Jim Black: "Re: can't solve this problem"
- Previous message: Paul Stowe: "A question about observed event duration & distance?"
- Next in thread: william mook: "Re: From Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean - resend"
- Reply: william mook: "Re: From Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean - resend"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:46:27 GMT
First try was sabotaged by a hacker.
On Oct 3, 2004, at 3:00 AM, RKiehn2352@aol.com wrote:
Jack
I have
not introduced anti matter at all, but I have introduced a real
observational result that mimics for the first time Wheeler wormholes.
If you want to see the experiments, down load the 13 Mb movie
http://www22.pair.com/csdc/download/blackspots.avi.
Cool, thanks.
*
hc is not equal to e^2 unless you use cgs units,
Yes, that is what I meant. I don't care if you throw in the 1/4piepsilon
which of course is better to include PV effect.
OK use e^2/4pi(epsilon)hc ~ 1/137
So what I mean in MKS is that if you have a parallel plate Casimir force
F ~ hcA/d^4
Where hc is used to interpret it as a ZPF force from free virtual photon
pressure differentials as Milonni and Puthoff claim
You can reinterpret it as a Casimir-Polder induced dipole-dipole
electro-static force
F ~ (e^2/4pi(epsilon))A/d^4
which you MUST do to be consistent with the additional constraints of
general relativity not found in the QED theory. That plus Ian Peterson's
claim that the upper bound of energy available from the Casimir force is
that of the induced dipole-dipole pair potential ~ 1/r^7 including
retardation not from the RANDOM virtual photon zero point vacuum
reservoir, which must have ZERO PRESSURE to be consistent with general
relativity.
So what we have in Milonni's book are 3 alternative models, i.e. 2.7,
3.10, Ch. 7 for hcA/d^4 - all are degenerate without the additional
physics from general relativity completely absent in Milonni's book and
Puthoff's latest EVO Casimir force paper. Introducing general relativity
means that Milonni's 3rd model in Ch 7 is the only acceptable
explanation. That is, all text books using only QED without general
relativity are fundamentally conceptually incomplete in how to handle
vacuum energies. This is what causes the cosmological constant paradox
that is still not understood by the Pundits.
but then you throw the baby out with the wash.
The fine structure constant involves properties of free space (no
quantum vacuum BS),
"free space" is "quantum vacuum" so I don't understand your last remark.
easily recognized in MKS units.
*
In fact,
To better than 9 significant figures, the fine structure constant is
the ratio of two impedances
_ = 1/2 (Z free space)/( Z Hall)
Sure, OK that is a useful way to look it it.
*
If you have an arrow of time, you must be able to show thermodynamic
irreversibility of a finite dynamical process.
Here is how I explain the Arrow of Time solving Roger Penrose's problem
with Inflation in his "Fashion, Faith and Fantasy" lecture at GR 17
Dublin, July 2004.
We start with the pre-inflationary unstable globally flat false vacuum
of QED (extend to standard gauge force theory). I only now look at QED
to make the basic idea simpler. Like Puthoff & Haisch's model all
charges have zero rest mass because there is no gravity as yet.
Therefore, the Dirac sea of virtual negative energy bare electrons has
its edge beach front at E = 0. This is unstable because exchange of
virtual photons between electrons and positron holes on the beach bind
them off mass shell into a bound state with ODLRO macroscopic occupation
of a single boson wave packet for the center of mass of the EPR virtual
electron-hole pair. This is the pre -> post inflationary spontaneous
broken symmetry phase transition from flat micro-quantum false vacuum
sans gravity to curved more stable vacuum with gravity emergent from the
rigid Goldstone phase ripples. This is an example of P.W. Anderson's
bottom -> up general principle of emergent complexity spontaneous
self-organization "More is different" that applies to real quanta as
well as virtual quanta in almost ALL physical situations. The rest mass
of the electron m ~ 10^-27 gm is simply the non-perturbative BCS type
energy gap in the quasi-particle (dressed electron) spectrum as shown by
Nambu and Jona-Lasino years ago.
As is well known this pre-inflationary micro-quantum zero gravity flat
false vacuum has a much large phase space volume than does the
post-inflationary curved space-time macro-quantum vacuum whose vacuum
condensate is called the "Higgs Ocean" by Brian Greene. The Higgs Ocean
is what is left over from the phase space collapse of the massless Dirac
Sea.
Entropy = klog(Phase Space Volume)
Therefore initial post-inflationary Higgs Ocean has smaller entropy than
the pre-inflationary negative energy Dirac Sea.
This jump starts the Cosmic Clock's Arrow of Time to be in same
direction as the expanding space of our universe in accord with Roger
Penrose's initial condition requirement.
Using the world hologram idea the large-scale cosmological entropy of
the post-inflationary vacuum is simply
S(Curved Vacuum) = kR(t)^2
where R(t) is the dimensionless FRW space scale factor and k is
Boltzmann's constant.
This is consistent with Hawking's formula for black hole entropy
S(Black Hole) = kArea/4piLp^2
If you can not demonstrate such a result analytically, then I do not
believe your story that you have an Arrow of Time.
Done above.
You cannot use entropy concepts that are based upon equilibrium states.
I have not done so. I am not using classical thermodynamics of
on-mass-shell quanta. I am using macro-quantum thermodynamics that fits
the Hawking-Bekinstein-t'Hooft-Susskind ideas.
**
See
http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/arwtheory.pdf
published in
Kiehn, R. M. (2003), Thermodynamic Irreversibility and the Arrow of
Time, in "The Nature of Time: Geometry, Physics and Perception", R.
Bucher et al. (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, p.243-250.
Using Wheeler's "Geometrodynamics" of "Charge without charge" for strong
short-range G* ~ 10^40G dark energy induced effective gravity for
electrons and protons as micro-geon N = 1 EVO (Ken Shoulders) Bohm
hidden variables:
On C-violation, the electric Faraday flux lines out of the real proton
wormhole mouths on a given brane must enter the real electron wormhole
mouths on the same brane in an electrically neutral brane. These same
flux lines continue on the dual brane in the universe next door. We do
not see isolated quarks in this phase of vacuum. Mesons are
quark-antiquark pairs and the same idea will work for their flux lines.
Now one can ask, why do the electric flux lines all enter the real
electron wormhole mouths? This is like a Heisenberg ferromagnet domain.
The brane energy is minimized that way like when all spins are parallel
in the ground state. An anti-ferromagnetic analogy would be a universe
with equal amounts of real matter and anti-matter but that would
annihilate quickly and not survive for long on the Anthropic Landscape
of the Multiverse.
My Father's House Has Many Mansions
- Next message: Jim Black: "Re: can't solve this problem"
- Previous message: Paul Stowe: "A question about observed event duration & distance?"
- Next in thread: william mook: "Re: From Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean - resend"
- Reply: william mook: "Re: From Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean - resend"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
