Re: A hurricane theory (kst)
From: ZZBunker (zzbunker_at_netscape.net)
Date: 10/04/04
- Next message: Andr? Michaud: "Re: Spin"
- Previous message: sal: "Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: A hurricane theory (kst)"
- Maybe reply: ZZBunker: "Re: A hurricane theory (kst)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Oct 2004 09:17:13 -0700
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:<2psemqFo4jnfU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> >>Storm path is unpredictable for fundamental mathematical reasons.
> >
> >
> > No it's not, it's difficult yes, like putting
> > on a hilly wet green, but with improved theory
> > and more data trajectory prediction improves.
> > Think Voyager!
>
> The storm is a chaotic process. You would have to know the boundry
> conditions to an infinite number of decimal places to compute its course
> perfectly.
That is hardly true, since you can control storm
movement easily, given that the "infinite"
presicion only exists in the idiot minds
of mathematicians to even being with.
Since the only reason chaos theory itself
even exists, is because chemists and
their non-existent QM Huygens principle
are merely the intellectual equivalvent of
physicists and Carl Sagen.
>
> Bob Kolker
- Next message: Andr? Michaud: "Re: Spin"
- Previous message: sal: "Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: A hurricane theory (kst)"
- Maybe reply: ZZBunker: "Re: A hurricane theory (kst)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|