Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits

From: FrankH (franklinhu_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/05/04 

Date: 5 Oct 2004 09:49:14 -0700

"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:<2sf57rF1kea17U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> FrankH wrote:
>
> >
> > These are just a few of the musings I've had about the aether. I make
> > no claim of right or wrong, but I think giving the aether a physical
> > description is vital in trying to explain how such an aether might
> > work. Such a physical description may also give rise to experiments to
> > show that empty space is actually filled with neutrons - has anyone
> > tried?
>
> Don't give up your daytime job. The system you have described would make
> motion impossible unless there were empty space between the particles,
> which contradicts your assertion.
>
> Bob Kolker

Motion would be possible as long as the neutron bonds aren't very
strong and the neutrons show some compressibility. We are used to
solids which restrict movement. For example, you can't pass through
solid steel. But you can pass through solid aether because the bonds
between the particles isn't very strong and they are easily pushed
aside. But it is still a solid because it has a specific bonded
arrangement that allows it to exactly transmit any wave action applied
to it including transverse waves. You could think of it as a cubic
lattice attached by springs. I also wouldn't think that the aether is
perfectly aligned either. It may contain aligned grains or crystals
like those found in solidified metals. I also think the aether must be
a compressible medium because it explains the basic physical mechanism
for the attraction between protons and electrons. It has been shown
that 2 objects vibrating in phase in a compressible medium will
attract while similar objects vibrating out of phase repel in
accordance to the 1/r^2 law. This is known as the Bjerknes forces. The
ambient thermal energy causes protons/electrons to ring like bells and
it is the interactions of these waves that we detect as the
electrostatic force. This model would predict that protons emit an
extremely high frequency which is identical to electrons but phase
shifted. This reduces all the phenomenon we see down to an easily
understood physical model.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The aether is made out of ordinary protons and electrons
    ... > made up of matter particles that we are all familiar with. ... The word "aether" has a rather well-defined meaning. ... > aether is made up of nothing more than an array of alternating protons ... electrons interact with electromagnetic radiation!!! ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The aether is made out of ordinary protons and electrons
    ... A better argument against aether dragging is stellar ... an aether particle and *between* aether particles. ... even protons bound in a nucleus are surrounded by aether ... > It is reasonable to make the assumption that electrons are more mobile ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Why relativists dont understand Einsteins 1905 mathematics.
    ... "Defective semantics destroyed theoretical physics more surely than ... <It cannot mutate into waves for part of the journey because by their ... through Maxwell's compressible aether, or through Lorentz's ... If it were it could not possibly knock electrons out of a metal ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Einsteins Second Postulate Violates His First.
    ... assume that the aether exists - provided you ditch all aether dependent ... The waves of Maxwell's theory exist. ... Interference fringes: ... his book, the theory of electrons. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
    ... Hint - The waves of Maxwell's wave in aether theory do not physically exist. ... If the light level is reduced such that photons arrive singly at a double slit, interference fringes are detected, it is claimed that 'interference' still takes place. ... Just because you either do not like or understand relativity does ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)