Re: Why Time Moves Light

From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (net_at_nospam.com)
Date: 10/06/04


Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 07:10:00 -0700

Dear Old Man:

"Old Man" <nomail@nomail.net> wrote in message
news:s9ydnSBuOJgTBP7cRVn-qQ@prairiewave.com...
>
> "Country Loon" <fitlikemin@mearns.fairmers.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1097035927.68138@ftpsrv1...
>>
>> "Morituri-Max" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote in message
>> news:kTC4d.16468$Qb.9920@fe2.texas.rr.com...
>> > Paul Cardinale wrote:
>> > > Idiot. There's no such thing as "the speed of time". You've
>> > > previously demonstrated that your too stupid to understand the
>> > > concept
>> > > of acceleration. Now you demonstrate that puny little mind can't
>> > > grasp 'speed' either.
>> >
>> > Please don't feed this troll.. He's on the Operation Troll Shoulder
>> > List
>> and
>> > cannot be educated. Ever.
>> >
>> > Thanks. No reply necessary, have a good one.
>> >
>> Just as a matter of interest - can we have non-linear time?
>
> Sure: whilst falling in a - GM / r^2 gravitational field. Time
> in the falling frame, t_f, compared to that in free space, t_0,
> is given by
>
> t_f / t_0 = sqrt{[1 - (2 G M) / (r c^2)] [ 1- (v / c)^2]}
>
> Which depends upon the radius, r, and that depends upon
> time, but, within the falling frame, nothing would be amiss.
> Whatever the radius or speed, the falling observer's time is
> "proper".

Think end-of-path... "ploper" ;>)

David A. Smith



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why Time Moves Light
    ... > time, but, within the falling frame, nothing would be amiss. ... > Whatever the radius or speed, ... David A. Smith ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Why Time Moves Light
    ... time, but, within the falling frame, nothing would be amiss. ... Whatever the radius or speed, ... "proper". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Why Time Moves Light
    ... time, but, within the falling frame, nothing would be amiss. ... Whatever the radius or speed, ... "proper". ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Analytic mappings, normal family
    ... >have easily made the radius .7, and then our bound would be even better ... There exist versions of the Cauchy Integral Formula that would ... >> David C. Ullrich ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fotos_vom_eigene_K=F6?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?rper_machen=3F?=
    ... "Manche Menschen haben einen Gesichtskreis vom Radius Null. ... Sie nennen das Ihren Standpunkt." ... (David Hilbert) ...
    (de.rec.fotografie)

Quantcast