Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
From: FrankH (franklinhu_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/06/04
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Entropy and Learning (like physics for example)"
- Previous message: Richard Herring: "Re: why higher frequency wave penetrates and other won't.???"
- In reply to: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: Paul Draper: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Reply: Paul Draper: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 6 Oct 2004 09:49:36 -0700
Creighton Hogg <wchogg@hep.wisc.edu> wrote in message news:<Pine.LNX.4.44.0410051151230.30836-100000@erodium.hep.wisc.edu>...
> On 5 Oct 2004, FrankH wrote:
>
> All the phenomenon we see? What about weak and strong interactions? What
> about the internal structure of the protons and neutrons? What about the
> neutrinos? Does it explain the neutrino masses and their splitting?
Oh, sorry, I forgot what "all" includes. How about "some" major
characteristics of empty space. How about talking about whether this
theory is possible according to the evidence I have laid out.
As for the other phenomenon you mentioned, I actually don't believe
that there are any "weak: and "strong" forces. These entities were
created to explain how a mass of protons/neutrons can be compressed
into an impossibly tiny speck. An associated theory I have says that
real atoms are also composed of alternating series of
protons/electrons, very similar to the aether but take on an
octahedral configuration and but they do not blend into the aether and
act to distort it. The atoms fill space and the nucleus occupies the
entire volume of the atom. Since my atoms are not tiny specks and the
alternating proton/electrons naturally keep it together, there is not
need for a strong force. I currently have no understanding of the weak
force, so I cannot comment on that. Under the theories I have been
considering, only the electrostatic force exists and this force is
caused by the physical interaction of phased waves within the aether.
The structure of a neutron appears to be that of a bound
proton/electron. The internal structure of protons and electrons is a
level of detail beyond explaining the aether and I would accept that
the current evidence for these being made out of quarks seems
reasonable.
>From some brief reading about neutrinos, these may be explainable as
aether neutron particles put into motion in space. Collisions could
knock lose an aether neutron. The mass would be dependent on how
slippery an aether particle is. I would imagine it is very slippery
since neutron aether bonds appear very weak and should appear as
having very little mass if any.
>
> If empty space is filled with neutrons as you say, how can this be stable?
> Neutrons decay rather rapidly. Protons, however, are quite stable.
The neutrons we know about which come shooting out of decaying atoms,
may be very different from the aether neutrons. I only used the term
"neutrons" since it already describes a neutral pairing of electrons
and protons, but could in fact be completely different beasts. An
alternating array of protons/electrons would be exceedingly stable - I
once did a calculation showing it to be a stable arrangement.
I don't find it suprising that neutrons decay rapidly. Since this
proton/electron pair doesn't have the atomic arrangement to keep it in
a compact form, I would expect that once it was released, the ambient
thermal energy would be enough to cause it to separate into
proton/electron. The external neutron from an atomic decay still
represents a mass which doesn't fit into the aether matrix at any
time, and the components don't fit either, so we can observe them. A
neutrino may look like a neutron except that it does fit into the
aether matrix. Maybe I should say that the aether is made up of
neutrinos instead, but I probably just need to reinforce that it is an
alternating array of normal protons/electrons and nothing more.
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Entropy and Learning (like physics for example)"
- Previous message: Richard Herring: "Re: why higher frequency wave penetrates and other won't.???"
- In reply to: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: Paul Draper: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Reply: Paul Draper: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
