Re: OMG! 9/11 Attack on the Pentagon Bldg!

From: John Griffin (thathillbilly_at_yahooie.com)
Date: 10/07/04 

Date: 7 Oct 2004 10:03:21 GMT

Mental Klutz "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
> "John Griffin" <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote
>> "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> [ Snipped nonsensical stuff about primitives' attack on
>> >>>>> Pentagon, including a reminder of the fact that ***
>> >>>>> Eastman is remarkably stupid ]
>>
>> > Jason:
>> >
>> > "Duhh... gasses are fluids?" LOL
>>
>> They certainly are.
>> Get someone to look up the word "fluid" for you.
>> Try to understand that it isn't a synonym for "liquid."
>> Don't try too hard,
>> though-- it could result in a dangerous elevation of your cranial gas
>> pressure.
>
> John, if you weren't such a painful retard, you'd have realised I was
> mocking "Jason" for his idiotic question "gasses are fluids too?".

If that were true, there would be some evidence to that effect in the
article where I found your dumb question. At the very least, there would
have been a Jason. At this point, you know that gasses are fluid, so
what's with all the fucking excitement?! It's old news. When you found out,
everyone knew.

> I thought the "duhh" whih I rather artfully added and the "Jason: "
> before would have made that perfectly clear, even to someone as
> slow-witted as yourself.

That was funny. It sure as hell looked like you were reminding some
phantom "Jason" entity of something. So there were two choices. Either the
invisible Jason previously said it or you previously said it. It's dumb as
hell, which pointed directly to you. BFD. I would have been forced to
choose you anyway, because I have no evidence that Jason exists. As far as
I know, based on all the evidence I've seen (that one article), Jason is
either you or some incredibly fucked up individual who is dumb enough to
swallow all that predictable horse*** written by fucking idiots who can't
follow the obvious trail that connects an airplane to a crash site. I know
that demented fool *** Eastman posts in one of these groups. You're asking
me to believe there are two human culls who are that far gone into pure
fantasy, in the same newsgroup at the same time. Too much of a fucking
coincidence! Once again, it looks like you authored the original question
you were repeating, if not by Jasony then by twy. I'm not saying you're
playing any lame Jason role here, but if you are, you could sure have some
awesomely dumb arguments with yourself.

Artful would have been "Jason, we said:..."

> It appears that since the day whatever pockmarked harridan you call
> "mother" shat you out of her cancerous *** your cognitive function
> has not yet raised itself to the level one would associate with a
> particularly dull whelk.

Twy, your tantrum started with a sputter of vapor and degenerated through
turbulent flow right down to chaotic. Try to avoid getting so excited. Get
some dampers or something. Count to ten. Grow up, maybe. If none of that
works, get a governer--the kind they used to use on steam engines, highly
appropriate for your steam-driven output generator.

Now that that's settled, I just want to say that replying with such a
tantrum and ending your frantic fulmination with "The button has been
pushed" was just too fucking funny.

I don't have a button or even a concert of buttons that would make me say
anything as lame and childish as your last paragraph. No ***. That sort of
button is so rare that they're prized collector's items. You didn't wait
until your system was completely pressurized before you went into output
mode, so you waded through some seriously turbulent "logic" to get from
what I said to my being the offspring of a pockmarked harridan with a
cancerous *** that somehow got plumbed into her intestines. I wish you'd
describe that line of thought. It has to be funny as hell. It would show
once again that these are family newsgroups--the five-year-olds will lap it
up.

Meanwhile, if there's any need for anyone to know what was the lamest
tantrum or the most infantile tantrum ever posted in these newsgroups, we
can refer to that paragraph.

> Now let's sit back and listen to John recycle yet another
> self-congratulatory stream of usenet-semen declaring himself master of
> usenet..

"Yet another" says that you can find two instances of that. I'd give you a
break and challenge you to find one, but you couldn't, so to hell with it.
 
> The button has been pressed.

Side-splitting response to your stimulus, twy. Good one. <snicker> Watch
out for the landing on the other side of this hoop I'm holding up, twy.

Quantcast