Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed
From: The Ghost (theghost_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 10/07/04
- Next message: Jim Black: "Re: pieces of the puzzle"
- Previous message: Bob Cain: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- In reply to: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Next in thread: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Reply: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 23:00:36 GMT
"Porky" <noham@nospam.com> wrote in
news:rW79d.283263$%n4.19824@bignews6.bellsouth.net:
> Ah, you're improving, that one was pretty good, and from the
> character
> and quality of your posts,
I am glad that you recognize and appreciate the improvement. Since the
character and quality of your posts served as the benchmark, you are really
the one who rightfully deserves credit for the improvement.
> I deduce that your mouth and a male
> bovine's anus have much in common as well.
I had no idea that swine were either capable of deduction or were so
knowledgable about the male bovine anus. No doubt you are quite adept at
servicing all of the male bovine that line up at the swine pen on a daily
basis. What other farm animals suit your fancy?
> Both produce pure bull***.
Bulls see red. Swine see bull***. Neither correctly see reality.
- Next message: Jim Black: "Re: pieces of the puzzle"
- Previous message: Bob Cain: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- In reply to: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Next in thread: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Reply: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]