Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed
From: Jon Yaeger (jono_1_at_bellsouth.net)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Previous message: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- In reply to: The Ghost: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Next in thread: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 20:55:22 -0400
in article Xns957BB5D488546theghosthotmailcom@64.164.98.6, The Ghost at
theghost@sbcglobal.net wrote on 10/7/04 8:49 PM:
> who@needs.email.anyhow (Goofball_star_dot_etal) wrote in
> news:41657179.63226838@usenet.plus.net:
>
>> Well, I am not particularly keen to trash his work in public, behind
>> his back but aren't you just a teeny weeny bit concerned that to reach
>> the conclusuion that he does, that he really needs to know the
>> position of the speaker cone in relation to the frequency/phase
>> modulation? And you a self-proclaimed scientist and all.
>
>
> Bob Cain can call himself whatever he wants. However, not only is he not a
> scientist, he is not even a c-grade engineer, which is evident from the
> fact that he is so technically inept that he had to come to sci.physics
> begging someone to spoon feed him through the trivial solution of an
> elementary one-dimensional wave equation which is discussed in virtually
> every introductory textbook on acoustics. Worse yet, he is still making up
> and using meaningless terminology and pulling clearly incorrect equations
> out of thin air, so he still doesn't understand the solution that he was
> spoon fed.
>
And that's the charitable explanation! ;-)
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: How to tell if a theory is a good one"
- Previous message: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- In reply to: The Ghost: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Next in thread: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|