Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed
From: The Ghost (theghost_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: Mitchell: "Re: More evidence of negative curvature"
- Previous message: bernard.chaverondier: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- In reply to: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Next in thread: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Reply: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 01:46:07 GMT
"Porky" <noham@nospam.com> wrote in
news:4yl9d.40131$yp.22451@bignews1.bellsouth.net:
>
> "The Ghost" <theghost@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns957BA34E7AF9Ftheghosthotmailcom@64.164.98.6...
>> "Porky" <noham@nospam.com> wrote in
>> news:rW79d.283263$%n4.19824@bignews6.bellsouth.net:
>>
>> > Ah, you're improving, that one was pretty good, and from the
>> > character
>> > and quality of your posts,
>>
>> I am glad that you recognize and appreciate the improvement. Since
>> the character and quality of your posts served as the benchmark, you
>> are
> really
>> the one who rightfully deserves credit for the improvement.
>>
>
> Thank you! Your decency and kindness are matched only by your
> intelligence, and your wit, Zero equals zero, in other words.
>
>> > I deduce that your mouth and a male
>> > bovine's anus have much in common as well.
>>
>> I had no idea that swine were either capable of deduction or were so
>> knowledgeable about the male bovine anus. No doubt you are quite
>> adept at servicing all of the male bovine that line up at the swine
>> pen on a daily basis. What other farm animals suit your fancy?
>>
> The sum of what I know about a male bovine's anus is that it
> produces the
> same thing your mouth does, bull***. As for what other farm animals I
> like, that would be all of them, as long as they're properly cooked
> and served with the appropriate side dishes.
>
>>
>> Bulls see red. Swine see bull***. Neither correctly see reality.
>
> And ghosts, being nonexistent, are not a part of reality, therefore
> they
> cannot properly perceive reality, but we can see right through you.
>
Thank you for this and your other enlightening series of exchanges. You
have provided me with a great deal of insight into the mindset of the more
technically-inept regulars in the audio groups. I now have at least some
appreciation for why the level of technical discourse in the audio groups
has been and continues to be so pathetic and abysmal.
- Next message: Mitchell: "Re: More evidence of negative curvature"
- Previous message: bernard.chaverondier: "Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity."
- In reply to: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Next in thread: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Reply: Porky: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]