Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed

From: Porky (noham_at_nospam.com)
Date: 10/08/04 

Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:34:34 -0500

"The Ghost" <theghost@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Xns957BBF5F498A1theghosthotmailcom@64.164.98.7...
> "Porky" <noham@nospam.com> wrote in
> news:4yl9d.40131$yp.22451@bignews1.bellsouth.net:
>
> >
> > "The Ghost" <theghost@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:Xns957BA34E7AF9Ftheghosthotmailcom@64.164.98.6...
> >> "Porky" <noham@nospam.com> wrote in
> >> news:rW79d.283263$%n4.19824@bignews6.bellsouth.net:
> >>
> >> > Ah, you're improving, that one was pretty good, and from the
> >> > character
> >> > and quality of your posts,
> >>
> >> I am glad that you recognize and appreciate the improvement. Since
> >> the character and quality of your posts served as the benchmark, you
> >> are
> > really
> >> the one who rightfully deserves credit for the improvement.
> >>
> >
> > Thank you! Your decency and kindness are matched only by your
> > intelligence, and your wit, Zero equals zero, in other words.
> >
> >> > I deduce that your mouth and a male
> >> > bovine's anus have much in common as well.
> >>
> >> I had no idea that swine were either capable of deduction or were so
> >> knowledgeable about the male bovine anus. No doubt you are quite
> >> adept at servicing all of the male bovine that line up at the swine
> >> pen on a daily basis. What other farm animals suit your fancy?
> >>
> > The sum of what I know about a male bovine's anus is that it
> > produces the
> > same thing your mouth does, bull***. As for what other farm animals I
> > like, that would be all of them, as long as they're properly cooked
> > and served with the appropriate side dishes.
> >
> >>
> >> Bulls see red. Swine see bull***. Neither correctly see reality.
> >
> > And ghosts, being nonexistent, are not a part of reality, therefore
> > they
> > cannot properly perceive reality, but we can see right through you.
> >
>
> Thank you for this and your other enlightening series of exchanges. You
> have provided me with a great deal of insight into the mindset of the more
> technically-inept regulars in the audio groups. I now have at least some
> appreciation for why the level of technical discourse in the audio groups
> has been and continues to be so pathetic and abysmal.
>
  You're welcome! I appreciate the sincerity of your sarcasm. Unfortunately
for you, ghosts don't real brains, so they don't have insights either. On
the other hand, even swine have minds with which to have mindsets. As for
technical ineptness, you have shown so little technical knowledge here that
the term "inept" would be a profound compliment if used in reference to you.
The discourse only sounds pathetic and abysmal to you because it's so far
over your head.

Quantcast