Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae
carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu
Date: 10/10/04
- Next message: Double-A: "Re: underwires, do they work"
- Previous message: carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu: "Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae"
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:53:12 +0000 (UTC)
Ken S. Tucker <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
> carlip-nospam@physics.ucdavis.edu wrote in message
> news:<ck9knt$lbt$1@skeeter.ucdavis.edu>...
[...]
> I do not quite understand the meaning of "volume" in the context
> of G_uv = T_uv.
> Here's my understanding...
> Since G_uv conventionally defines curvature at a "point",
> the "volume" should occupy a point given by either,
> 1) dV = (small Volume) = Area*(dL = small length)
Certainly not.
> or
> 2) dV = dx dy dz
Yes. Go to any basic, introductory physics textbook (say, Halliday,
Resnick, and Walker's chapter on fluids), and learn what "density"
means.
> I get nervous with (2) because of the density that may occur
> within the transform of a 3D volume element, ie.
> dV' sqrt g' = dV sqrt g g=det|g_uv|
Why should this make you nervous?
Steve Carlip
- Next message: Double-A: "Re: underwires, do they work"
- Previous message: carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu: "Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae"
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Neutrino Mass and Supernovae"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|