Re: Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)
From: RP (no_mail_no_spam_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/11/04
- Next message: briggs_at_encompasserve.org: "Re: Help me solve this momentum question, pls"
- Previous message: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force"
- In reply to: Bob Cain: "Re: Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)"
- Next in thread: Bob Cain: "Re: Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)"
- Reply: Bob Cain: "Re: Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 07:29:07 -0500
Bob Cain wrote:
>
>
> RP wrote:
>
>
>> They are mutually exclusive logical systems, and as such the
>> conclusions of one bear no effect whatsoever on the conclusions of the
>> other.
>
>
> Only because they have a mutually exclusive premise. Newton's theory
> requires that light veloctities be additive. Einstein's requires the
> opposite, that it be constant for all observers. From only this
> difference, the first part of his paper develops his theory purely
> kinematically and arrives at the Lorentz transformation.
>
>> They can both be correct, and moreover one can be correct and the
>> incorrect given exactly the same mathematical conclusion.
>
>
> Not sure what you mean here. There is an incorrect premise in Newton's
> theory that leads to incorrect prediction.
Which prediction would that be?
Richard Perry
- Next message: briggs_at_encompasserve.org: "Re: Help me solve this momentum question, pls"
- Previous message: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Gravity, Curvature vs Force"
- In reply to: Bob Cain: "Re: Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)"
- Next in thread: Bob Cain: "Re: Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)"
- Reply: Bob Cain: "Re: Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]