Re: The role of exchange particles in force

From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 10/12/04 

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:07:48 +0200

Y.Porat wrote:
> Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<ckdk0t$4s0$8@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
>
>>Y.Porat wrote:

[snip]

>>>how about your Fertz invention??
>>
>>Still going well, thanks.
>
> --------------
> ok
> showes what a scintist you are
> and what a person you are

Yes, indeed.

>>>did you innovated anything else for scince
>>
>>Yes. How often do I need to tell you that I published articles in
>>scientific journals?
>
> --------------
> ok
> and what are the uses of your parroting??

Since I did no parroting, I can't answer that...

>>>except parroting
>>>io dont mentioned here the 'super Fertz'
>>>how about your claim that the nuc has not a definit geometric shape
>>>*based of the HUP princilpe eh?? imbecil parrot?
>>
>>Stop misrepresenting my words. I never talked about "geometric shape".
>>---------------
>
> so what were your words
> i sayed that the nuc has a definit geometric shape
> and you denyed it right ??

Wrong. Hey, are you too lazy to go some to the relevant thread and
look up the actual formulations?

>>>how abouth you W boson?? did you find it already ??
>>
>>It was already found about 20 years ago at the LEP, thanks.
>>-----------
>
> but you forgot to tell that it was not found
> in its natural place where it should be found

The W boson has no "natural place". You make no sense.

> in the weak force or whereever it is alleged to be found

The W boson was indeed found in an interaction involving the weak force
at LEP.

>>>how abouth your gloupn that has *many masses*
>>
>>That was also already found years ago, thanks.
>
> -------------
> lier and imbecil

No, I am merely telling the truth.

> afaik
> no gluon was ever found experimentally

Three-jet events *are* found gluons. If you think otherwise, explain
them *quantitatively* without gluons.

>>>do you speak about Altzhemer????
>>
>>Well, either that, or you are lying willfully quite often.
>>-----------
>
> shameless croock
> you even just in an upper article
> *lied about my age!!*

Since I merely estimated your age, and made clear that it is only an
estimate, I obviously did not lie about it.

> i am not in my seventies got it pathologic lier?

Well, then how old are you? You refused to tell so far. For whatever reason.

> -------------
> ps
> why dont you do what Erick Pisse suggested to you:
> just killfile me. as a sane man would do
> folowing the sick relations between us ?
> just to remind
> it is always that you leech on me
> not the other way anyone can realise it
> by folowing our threads and articles
> do you deny that as well??disturbed croock?

Well, why don't *you* killfile *me*? After all, *you* keep complaining
that I "haunt" and "leech" you...

*I* am still amused about you... So far, not enough reason to killfile you.

Bye,
Bjoern

Quantcast