Re: Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)
From: Vladan (luxey1_at_eunet.yu)
Date: 10/15/04
- Next message: Vladan: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Previous message: Paul Draper: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- In reply to: Jim Carr: "Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:31:47 +0200
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 15:37:53 -0700, "Jim Carr" <jim@azwebpages.com>
wrote:
>Thus if we use my formula we can arrive at the correct wavelength in all
>cases of the source or receiver moving in a stationary medium. Am I totally
>whacked or is my theory, pardon the pun, sound?
I think you got it right.
- Next message: Vladan: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Previous message: Paul Draper: "Re: Basics series proposed"
- In reply to: Jim Carr: "Wavelength and Doppler (was Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed)"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: Basic Acoustic Derivation/Proof Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|