Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity
From: Mark Martin (qed100_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/15/04
- Next message: seratend: "hopelessly looking for superselection rules-variables"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Where is Invariant Mass?"
- In reply to: Mike: "Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity"
- Next in thread: David Harper: "Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity"
- Reply: David Harper: "Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Oct 2004 07:17:00 -0700
eleatis@yahoo.gr (Mike) wrote in message news:<9c1b39be.0410150258.30a09c2@posting.google.com>...
> Agree with theoretical predictions? What predictions? Is there a
> theoretical model that predicts changes in the gravitational field due
> to earthquakes? And if there is one, what are the values of the
> parameters used?
The predictions are undoubtedly from a theory of the redistribution
of geologic masses. Earthquakes in Japan are primarily connected to
volcanism; by measuring local gravitic changes they can map changes in
the underground lava chambers, which are precursors to seismic
activity.
> I think Japs should stick to mass production and sushi. Let others
> figure out whether 2 parts in a billion is due to vibrations from a
> factory a few miles away.
Japan is characterised by its overabundance of earthquakes. They of
all people ought to make expert geologists of themselves, for their
own welfare.
-Mark Martin
- Next message: seratend: "hopelessly looking for superselection rules-variables"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Where is Invariant Mass?"
- In reply to: Mike: "Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity"
- Next in thread: David Harper: "Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity"
- Reply: David Harper: "Re: Earthquake shakes up gravity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|